SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

The Impact of Online Reflective Practice-oriented Assessment on the Self-efficacy of Turkish EFL Pre-service Teachers: A Case Study

Işıl Günseli Kaçar(Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Bölümü)0000-0003-3043-5040
Pages
444–473
Publication Date
2023-10-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings indicated while verbal persuasion and enactive mastery experiences were regarded as the main self-efficacy sources for pre-service EFL teachers, affective states were also found influential in their self-efficacy perceptions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this mixed-methods case study is to explore the impact of online reflective practice-based assessment, virtual mentoring and video-mediated self-assessment on the self-efficacy of Turkish pre-service teachers of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in a practicum course in the 2021/2022 academic year.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Turkish version of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy scale by Capa, et al. (2005) was used to collect the quantitative data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings indicated while verbal persuasion and enactive mastery experiences were regarded as the main self-efficacy sources for pre-service EFL teachers, affective states were also found influential in their self-efficacy perceptions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:online · reflective · practice-based assessment

Abstract

The purpose of this mixed-methods case study is to explore the impact of online reflective practice-based assessment, virtual mentoring and video-mediated self-assessment on the self-efficacy of Turkish pre-service teachers of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in a practicum course in the 2021/2022 academic year. The Turkish version of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy scale by Capa, et al. (2005) was used to collect the quantitative data. Paired sample t-test was employed in the quantitative data analysis. Semi-structured interviews, reflection journals, and video-mediated post-teaching self-assessment forms were utilized in the qualitative data collection. Thematic content analysis was used in the qualitative data analysis. Findings indicated while verbal persuasion and enactive mastery experiences were regarded as the main self-efficacy sources for pre-service EFL teachers, affective states were also found influential in their self-efficacy perceptions. The study revealed the favorable impact of virtual mentoring and video-mediated self-assessment on pre-service EFL teachers’ self-efficacy development. Key words: online, reflective, practice-based assessment, self-efficacy, EFL pre-service teacher

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaçar, I. G. (2023). The Impact of Online Reflective Practice-oriented Assessment on the Self-efficacy of Turkish EFL Pre-service Teachers: A Case Study. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 444–473. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.1350604

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (59)

  1. Alagözlü, N. (2016). Pre-service EFL teachers’ professional self-concept: English teaching efficacy, self-reported English proficiency and pedagogical strategies: A case study in Turkish context. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 196-200.
  2. Alcı, B., & Yüksel, G. (2012). An examination into self-efficacy, metacognition and academic performance of pre-service ELT students: Prediction and difference. Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilmleri Dergisi, 2(1), 143-165.
  3. Alemdağ, E., & Erdem, M. (2017). Designing an e-mentoring program for novice teachers in Turkey and investigating online interactions and program outcomes. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1327394
  4. Atay, D. (2007). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62 (2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl053
  5. Aydın, Y. C., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2005). What predicts student teacher self-efficacy? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(4), 123-127
  6. Baecher, L. (2011). Collaborative video inquiry in MA TESOL coursework: “Working together to improve ourselves”. ELTED, 14, 1-7.
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  8. Baylor, A. L. (2011). The design of motivational agents and avatars. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1423-011-9196-3
  9. Bierema, L. L., & Hill, J. R. (2005). Virtual mentoring and HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 556–568.
  10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  12. Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 239-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00057-8
  13. Choi, E. & Lee, J., (2018). EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and teaching practices, ELT Journal, 72 (2), 175–186. https:// doi.org/ 10.12973/ejels.2.1.1
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  15. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  16. Çankaya, P. (2018). The exploration of the self-efficacy beliefs of English language teachers and student teachers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(3), 12-23.
  17. Çapa, Y., Çakıroğlu, J., & Sarıkaya, H. (2009. The development and validation of a Turkish version of teachers’ sense of efficacy scale. Education and Science, 30 (137), 74-81.
  18. Çelik, H., & Zehir Topkaya, E. (2017). Pre-service English teachers’ teaching-efficacy perceptions and their potential sources in the field experience. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 4(1), 12-24.
  19. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
  20. Eröz-Tuğa, B. (2013). Reflective feedback session using video recordings. English Language Teaching Journal, 67(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs081
  21. Farrell, T. (2013). Reflective writing for language teachers. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 295-297. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.39.3.06cha
  22. Fernandez, M, L. (2010). Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through icroteaching lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 351-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.012
  23. Flores, M.A. (2005). Mapping new teacher change: Findings from a two-year study. Teacher Development, 9(3), 89-411.
  24. Galvis, A., & Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Sharing and reflecting on teaching practices using Videopaper Builder 2. Education & Information Library, 1-2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277749677_Sharing_and_Reflecting_on_Teaching_Practices_by_using_VideoPaper_Builder_2.
  25. Gencer, A.S., & Çakıroglu. J. (2007). Turkish pre-service science teachers’ efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching and their beliefs about classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 664-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.013
  26. Hattie, J., & Timperly, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
  27. Kourieus, S. (2016). Video-mediated microteaching: A stimulus for reflection and teacher growth. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 65-80. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537- 560. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588427
  28. Kuter, S. Gazi, Z.A., & Aksal, F.A. (2012). Examination of co-construction of knowledge in videotaped simulated instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 174-184.
  29. Löfström, E. & Eisenschmidt, E. (2009). Novice teachers’ perspectives on mentoring: The case of the Estonian induction year. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 681-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.12.005
  30. Maskit, D. (2013). Pedagogical changes: Initiators, causes, dominant factors: A teacher's view. The International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, 19 (3): 89-107. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7963/CGP/v19i03/48903
  31. Orhan, F. (2008). Self-regulation strategies used in a practicum course: A study of motivation and teaching self-efficacy. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education, 35, 251-262.
  32. Pajares, F. (2002) Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41 (2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8
  33. Paker, T. (2011). Student teacher anxiety related to the teaching practicum. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 11(42), 207-224.
  34. Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Keogh, J. (2011). Pre-service student-teacher self-efficacy beliefs: An insight into the making of teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.6
  35. Poulou, M. (2007). Personal teaching efficacy and its sources: Student teachers’perceptions. Educational Psychology, 27, 191-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601066693
  36. Richter, D., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Klusmann, U., Anders, Y., & Baumert, J. (2013). How different mentoring approaches affect beginning teachers' development in the first years of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.012
  37. Rosaen, C. L., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., & Terpstra, M. (2008). Noticing noticing: How does investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322128
  38. Rupp, D., & Becker, E. S., (2021). Situational fluctuations in student teachers’self-efficacy and itsrelation to perceived teaching experiences and cooperating teachers’discourse elements during the teaching practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103252
  39. Savas, P. (2012). Use of digital video recording in the preparation stage of pre-service foreign language teachers’ microteachings. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications, 3(3), 107-116.
  40. Schraw, G., Crippen, K.J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
  41. Schwarzer, R., & Warner, L. M. (2014). Perceived self-efficacy and its relationship to resilience. In S. Prince-Embury & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Springer series on human exceptionality: Resilience in children, adolescents, and adults: Translating research into practice (pp. 139-150). Springer.
  42. Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Thurlings, M. (2008) The relationship between students’ perceptions of portfolio assessment practice and their approaches to learning, Educational Studies, 34,1, 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690701785269
  43. Sevimel, A., & Subasi, G. (2018). The factors affecting teacher efficacy perceptions of Turkish pre-service. English language teachers. The Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 1-17.
  44. Shepperd, C.E, & Hannafin, M.J. (2008). Examining preservice teacher inquiry through video-based, formative assessment e-portfolios. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(1), 31-37.
  45. Silverman, S. K., & Davis, H. A. (2009). Teacher efficacy. In E. Anderman, & L. Anderman (Eds.), Psychology of classroom learning: An encyclopedia (PCL), (pp. 915-920). Macmillan Reference.
  46. Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2003). Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 625-648.
  47. Smith Risser, H. (2013). Virtual induction: A novice teacher’s use of Twitter to form an informal mentoring network. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 25-33.
  48. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.
  49. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher Efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  50. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
  51. Toussi, M. T., Boori, A., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2011) The role of EFL teachers’ self regulation in effective teaching, World Journal of Education, 1 (2), 39-48.
  52. Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2015). The contribution of assessment experiences to student teachers' self-efficacy in competence-based education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.013
  53. Voerman, P., Meijer, P, J., Korthagen F.A.J., & Simons, R.J. (2012). Types and frequencies of feedback interventions in classroom interaction in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1107-1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.013
  54. Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
  55. Wyatt, M. & Dikilitaş, K. (2016). English language teachers becoming more efficacious through research engagement at their Turkish university. Educational Action Research, 24(4), 550-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1076731
  56. Yüksel, H.G. (2014). Becoming a teacher: tracing changes in pre-service English as a foreign language teachers' sense of efficacy. South African Journal, 34(3), 1-8 https://doi.org/10.15700/201409161104
  57. Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308-319). Libraries Unlimited.
  58. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Pres
  59. Shepperd, C.E, & Hannafin, M.J. (2008). Examining preservice teacher inquiry through video-based, formative assessment e-portfolios. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(1), 31-37.