SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim Bilim ve Araştırma Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Use of Web 2.0 Supported Formative Assessment Tools (Kahoot Example) at Different Grade Levels and Teaching Methods in Science and Chemistry Courses

Web 2.0 Destekli Biçimlendirici Değerlendirme Araçlarının (Kahoot Örneği) Fen Bilimleri ve Kimya Derslerinde Farklı Kademe ve Öğretim Şekillerinde Kullanımı

Sibel SADİ YILMAZ
Pages
568–585
Publication Date
2023-10-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can also be said that teachers and students need financial support in accessing technology and practical training in its effective use.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined, the usage process of Kahoot which is one of the web 2.0 supported formative assessment tools, in the secondary school 5th-grade science course (face-to-face), primary school teaching department chemistry course (face-to-face), and science teaching department chemistry course (distance education).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results obtained from this study revealed that the teacher's attitude towards using instructional technologies, student characteristics (like/dislike of competition, etc.), and the method of teaching (face-to-face, distance) are important in the effective use of web 2.0 tools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can also be said that teachers and students need financial support in accessing technology and practical training in its effective use.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biçimlendirici değerlendirme · Fen eğitiminde biçimlendirici değerlendirme · web 2. 0 destekli öğrenme araçları

Abstract

This study examined, the usage process of Kahoot which is one of the web 2.0 supported formative assessment tools, in the secondary school 5th-grade science course (face-to-face), primary school teaching department chemistry course (face-to-face), and science teaching department chemistry course (distance education). This study used Phenomenology, which is one of the qualitative research methods that examines human experiences. The participants of the study are a faculty member/a researcher, and a science teacher. The results obtained from this study revealed that the teacher's attitude towards using instructional technologies, student characteristics (like/dislike of competition, etc.), and the method of teaching (face-to-face, distance) are important in the effective use of web 2.0 tools. It can also be said that teachers and students need financial support in accessing technology and practical training in its effective use.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, bir araştırmacının web 2.0 destekli biçimlendirici değerlendirme araçlarından Kahoot un ortaokul 5. Sınıf fen bilimleri dersi (yüz-yüze), sınıf öğretmenliği bölümü kimya dersi (yüz-yüze), fen bilgisi öğretmenliği bölümü kimya dersi (uzaktan eğitim) kullanım süreci incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, amacı insan deneyimlerini inceleyen nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden olan fenomenoloji kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın katılımcıları bir öğretim üyesi olan araştırmacı ve bir fen bilgisi öğretmenidir. Bu çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar, web 2.0 araçlarının etkili kullanılmasında, öğretmenin öğretim teknolojilerini kullanmaya yönelik tutumu, öğrenci özellikleri (rekabetten hoşlanma/hoşlanmama vb), öğretim şeklinin (yüz-yüze, uzaktan) önemli olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca öğretmenlerin ve öğrencilerin teknolojiye erişim konusunda maddi olarak desteğe ve etkili kullanma konusunda ise uygulamalı eğitimlere ihtiyaçları olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, S. S. (2023). Use of Web 2.0 Supported Formative Assessment Tools (Kahoot Example) at Different Grade Levels and Teaching Methods in Science and Chemistry Courses. Eğitim Bilim ve Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 568–585. https://ajindex.com/articles/968887

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alawadhi, A.ve Abu-Ayyash, E. A.S. (2021). Students’ perceptions of Kahoot: An exploratory mixed-method study in EFL undergraduate classrooms in the UAE. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3629–3658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10425-8
  2. Black, P. ve Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  3. Boston, C. (2019) "The Concept of Formative Assessment," Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 8(9), https://doi.org/10.7275/kmcq-dj31
  4. Correia, M. ve Santos, R. (2017, November). Game-based learning: The use of Kahoot in teacher education. In 2017 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 1-4).
  5. IEEE. Curto Prieto, M., Orcos Palma, L., Blázquez Tobías, P. J. ve León, F. J. M. (2019). Student assessment of the use of Kahoot in the learning process of science and mathematics. Education Sciences, 9(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010055
  6. Çekiç, A. ve Bakla, A. (2021). A review of digital formative assessment tools: Features and future directions. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(3). 1459-1485.
  7. Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 49-52.
  8. Fuller, J. S. ve Dawson, K. M. (2017). Student response systems for formative assessment: Literature-based strategies and findings from a middle school implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(4), 370-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6206 Fuster-Guilló, A., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., Azorín-López, J., Rico-Soliveres, M. L. ve Restrepo-Calle, F. (2019). Evaluating impact on motivation and academic performance of a game-based learning experience using Kahoot. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02843
  9. Göksün, D. O. ve Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers & Education, 135, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.015
  10. Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment: A handbook for educators. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley. İlhan, N., Güngör, H. ve Gülseven, E. (2022). Scale of attitudes towards online formative assessment: Teacher’ attitudes during COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.2.241
  11. Kamble, A., Gauba,