SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2023 / Cilt: 31 Sayı: 58

Investigation of The Effects of The Use of Blockchain and Internet of Things Technologies on Performance Indicators with The Intermediary Role of Supply Chain Transparency

Tedarik Zinciri Şeffaflığının, Nesnelerin İnterneti ve Blokzincir Kullanımları Üzerindeki Aracı Etkisinin Performans Göstergeleri Üzerindeki Etkisi Açısından İncelenmesi

Muhammed Furkan TAŞCI
Dilşad GÜZEL
Pages
409–442
Publication Date
2023-10-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it has been determined that using blockchain and IoT technologies affects SCT and performance indicators of businesses with the mediation effect of SCT.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study examines the mediating role of supply chain transparency in the impact of blockchain (BZ) and Internet of Things (IoT) usage on business performance indicators.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It also examines the impact of the use of the IoT and blockchain on SCT and the impact of SCT on the performance indicators of businesses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it has been determined that using blockchain and IoT technologies affects SCT and performance indicators of businesses with the mediation effect of SCT.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Blok Zincir · Nesnelerin İnterneti · Tedarik Zinciri Şeffaflığı

Abstract

The study examines the mediating role of supply chain transparency in the impact of blockchain (BZ) and Internet of Things (IoT) usage on business performance indicators. It also examines the impact of the use of the IoT and blockchain on SCT and the impact of SCT on the performance indicators of businesses. The research data were collected from 29 associations affiliated with the Federation of Turkish Food and Beverage Industry Associations and from 392 managers in the food and beverage sector businesses that are members of these associations. Data were tested with SPSS 20 and SmartPLS 3 programs. As a result, it has been determined that using blockchain and IoT technologies affects SCT and performance indicators of businesses with the mediation effect of SCT.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı, blok zinciri (BZ) ve nesnelerin interneti (IoT) kullanımının işletmelerin performans göstergeleri üzerindeki etkisinde tedarik zinciri şeffaflığının aracılık rolünü incelemektir. Ayrıca IoT ve BZ kullanımının tedarik zinciri şeffaflığı ve tedarik zinciri şeffaflığının işletmelerin performans göstergeleri üzerindeki etkileri incelenmektedir. Araştırmanın verileri Türkiye Gıda ve İçecek Sanayii Dernekleri Federasyonuna bağlı olan 29 dernek ve bu derneklere üye olan gıda ve içecek sektörü işletmelerinde 392 yöneticiden anket yöntemi kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Veriler SPSS 20 ve SmartPLS 3 programlarıyla test edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak; blok zinciri ve nesnelerin interneti teknolojileri kullanımlarının tedarik zinciri şeffaflığını ve tedarik zinciri şeffaflığı aracı etkisiyle işletmelerin performans göstergelerini etkilediği saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞCI, M. F., GÜZEL, D. (2023). Investigation of The Effects of The Use of Blockchain and Internet of Things Technologies on Performance Indicators with The Intermediary Role of Supply Chain Transparency. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 58, 409–442. https://ajindex.com/articles/967955

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ahmed, W. & M. Omar (2019), “Drivers of supply chain transparency and its effects on performance measures in the automotive industry: Case of a developing country”, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 33(2), 159-186.
  2. Ahsan, M. et al. (2016), “Ensuring interoperability among heterogeneous devices through IoT middleware”, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 14(4), 251. Andersson, P. & L. Mattsson (2015), “Service innovations enabled by the Internet of Things”, Industrial Marketing and Purchasing Journal, 9(1), 85-106.
  3. Bai, C. & J. Sarkis (2020), “A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology”, International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2142-2162. Bąk, S. et al. (2015), “Synthesis of real-time cloud applications for Internet of Things”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 23(3), 913-929.
  4. Banerjee, S.P. et al. (2020), “An investigation into dimensions of service quality in B Schools”, Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 12(3), 3810. Bastian, J. & J. Zentes (2013), “Supply chain transparency as a key prerequisite for sustainable agri-food supply chain management”, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 23(5), 553-570.
  5. Bracken, B.A. & A. Barona (1991), “State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment”, School Psychology International, 12(1-2), 119-132.
  6. Brikman, Y. (2014), Blockchain by Analogy,, 04.04.2022. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014), Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara:
  7. Pegem. Cai, H. et al. (2014), “IoT-based configurable information service platform for product lifecycle management”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), 1558-1567.
  8. Carroll, A.B. (1979), “A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance”, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
  9. Carroll, A.B. (1999), “Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct”, Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
  10. Carter, C.R. & D.S. Rogers (2008), “A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.
  11. Chin, W.W. (1998), “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling”, in: G.A. Marcoulides (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (295-336), Mahwah