SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Başkent Üniversitesi Ticari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Does Blue-Collars’ Well-Being Always Enhance Job Engagement? The Moderating Influence of Meaningful Work

Mavi Yakalıların İyi Oluş Düzeyi Her Zaman İşe Tutunmayı Arttırır mı? Anlamlı İşin Düzenleyici Etkisi

Meral Kızrak(BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0003-0053-6043
Gamze Güner Kibaroğlu(BASKENT UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6187-4607
Pages
167–187
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Limitations: Limitations include a Turkish-only participant sample, potentially limiting generalization; self-report measures introducing response bias; cross-sectional data hindering causal relationship establishment; and a sole reliance on quantitative methods, omitting qualitative insights.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Integrating the assumptions of Self-Regulation Theory, the Job Characteristics Model and the Positive Psychology Approach, this empirical study aims to investigate the moderating role of meaningful work in the relationship between well-being and job engagement among blue-collar workers, contributing to an enhanced understanding of the complex interplay between these constructs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: The research adopted a quantitative research design by utilizing data obtained from blue-collar workers (n:237).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Limitations: Limitations include a Turkish-only participant sample, potentially limiting generalization; self-report measures introducing response bias; cross-sectional data hindering causal relationship establishment; and a sole reliance on quantitative methods, omitting qualitative insights.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anlamlı İş · İyi oluş · İşe tutunma

Abstract

Purpose: Integrating the assumptions of Self-Regulation Theory, the Job Characteristics Model and the Positive Psychology Approach, this empirical study aims to investigate the moderating role of meaningful work in the relationship between well-being and job engagement among blue-collar workers, contributing to an enhanced understanding of the complex interplay between these constructs. Methodology: The research adopted a quantitative research design by utilizing data obtained from blue-collar workers (n:237). The data, collected through an online method using scales with high levels of reliability and validity, was analyzed using Smart PLS 4 and IBM SPSS 26 software. The hypotheses and research model were tested employing the Bootstrapping analysis and structural equation modelling. Findings: The relationship between well-being and job engagement among blue-collar workers is influenced by the level of meaningful work, meaning that high meaningful work corresponds to a positive well-being-job engagement link while low meaningful work alters this relationship by negatively affecting job engagement through well-being. Implications: Managers should adopt a supportive leadership style in the blue-collar work environment to enhance the well-being and job engagement levels of employees. Additionally, blue-collar workers should have diversified tasks to increase their interest in their jobs and the level of meaningfulness associated with their work. Limitations: Limitations include a Turkish-only participant sample, potentially limiting generalization; self-report measures introducing response bias; cross-sectional data hindering causal relationship establishment; and a sole reliance on quantitative methods, omitting qualitative insights.

Özet

Amaç: Öz-Düzenleme Kuramı, İş Özellikleri Modeli ve Pozitif Psikoloji Yaklaşımının varsayımlarını dayanan bu görgül çalışma, mavi yakalı çalışanlar arasındaki iyi oluş ve işe tutunma arasındaki ilişkide işin anlamlılığının düzenleyici rolünü araştırarak bu kavramlar arasındaki karmaşık etkileşimin daha iyi anlaşılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamıştır. Yöntem: Araştırmada nicel araştırma deseni benimsenmiştir. Mavi yakalı çalışanlardan elde edilen veriler (n:237), güvenirlik ve geçerlik düzeyleri yüksek ölçekler kullanılarak online yöntemle toplanmış olup, veri analizi için Smart PLS 4 and IBM SPSS 26 yazılımları kullanılmıştır. Hipotezler ve araştırma modeli analizi ve Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile test edilmiştir. Bulgular: Mavi yakalı çalışanların iyi olma ve işe tutunma ilişkisi, işin anlamlılık düzeyinden etkilenmektedir. Yaptıkları işin anlamlı olduğunu düşünen çalışanlarda iyi olma ile işe tutunma arasında olumlu bir ilişki gözlemlenirken, anlamlılık düzeyinin düşük olması bu ilişkiyi olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Sonuç ve Katkılar: Yöneticiler, mavi yakalı çalışma ortamında iş görenlerin iyi olma durumunu ve işe tutunma düzeyini arttıracak destekleyici bir liderlik tarzı benimsemelidir. Ayrıca mavi yakalı çalışanların görevlerini çeşitlendirerek işlerine olan ilgiyi ve işin anlamlılık düzeyini arttırmalıdır. Sınırlılıklar: Çalışmanın sadece Türk katılımcı örneklemi içermesi genelleme olasılığını sınırlamaktadır. Ayrıca, çalışmanın öz bildirime dayalı ölçümlerinin yanıt yanlılığına yol açabilmesi; kullanılan kesitsel verilerin nedensel ilişkileri ortaya çıkarmadaki sorunları ve çalışmanın sadece nicel yöntemlere dayandırılmış olması önemli sınırlılıklar olarak değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kızrak, M., Kibaroğlu, G. G. (2023). Does Blue-Collars’ Well-Being Always Enhance Job Engagement? The Moderating Influence of Meaningful Work. Başkent Üniversitesi Ticari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 167–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/964099

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (74)

  1. Allan, B. A., Batz-Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M. & Tay, L. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12406
  2. Arnold, K. A., Turner, N., Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K. & McKee, M. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.193
  3. Baek, S. U., Yoon, J. H. & Won, J. U. (2023). Association between constant connectivity to work during leisure time and insomnia: does work engagement matter? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1-11.
  4. Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
  5. Bakker, A. B. & Bal, P. M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
  7. Bendassolli, P. F., Borges-Andrade, J. E., Alves, J. S. C. & Torres, T. D. L. (2015). Meaningful Work Scale in creative industries: A confirmatory factor analysis. Psico-USF, 20(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200101
  8. Brand-Labuschagne, L., Mostert, K., Rothmann Jr, S. & Rothmann, J. C. (2012). Burnout and work engagement of South African blue-collar workers: The development of a new scale. Southern African Business Review, 16(1).
  9. Bryson, A., Forth, J. & Stokes, L. (2017). Does employees' subjective well-being affect workplace performance? Human Relations, 70(8), 1017–1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717693073
  10. Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.
  11. Chen, C., Yen, C. & Tsai, F. C. (2014). Job crafting and job engagement: The mediating role of person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.10.006
  12. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  13. Chandra, C. M., Szwedo, D. E., Allen, J. P., Narr, R. K. & Tan, J. S. (2020). Interactions between anxiety subtypes, personality characteristics, and emotional regulation skills as predictors of future work outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 80, 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.02.011
  14. Dávila, C. & Finkelstein, M. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and well-being: preliminary results. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(3), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijap.20130303.03
  15. De Los Santos, J. A. A. & Labrague, L. J. (2021). Job engagement and satisfaction are associated with nurse caring behaviours: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(7), 2234-2242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13384
  16. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S. & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
  17. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  18. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3122271/ Göçen, A. (2021). How do teachers perceive meaningful leadership? Overview of a qualitative exploration. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/ 10.33902/JPR.2021066866
  19. Göçen, A. & Terzi, R. (2019). Eğitim örgütleri için Anlamlı İş ölçeği. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39 (3), 1487-1512. Grant, A. M., Christianson, M. K. & Price, R. H. (2007). Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.26421238
  20. Greenglass, E. R. & Fiksenbaum, L. (2009). Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being. European Psychologist, 14(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.29
  21. Güler, M., Çetin, F. & Basım, N. H. (2019). İşe tutulma ölçeği çok kısa versiyonu (UWES-3) geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması: Alternatif bir versiyonu (UWES-6) önerisi. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 6(2), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.516921
  22. Haar, J. & Roche, M. (2013). Three-way interaction effects of workaholism on employee well-being: Evidence from blue-collar workers in New Zealand. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(2), 134-149. https://doi:10.1017/jmo.2013.10.
  23. Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
  24. Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  25. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2017). Primer on partial least square structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM), (2nd Ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks.
  26. Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
  27. Hammedi, W., Leclercq, T., Poncin, I. & Alkire (Née Nasr), L. (2021). Uncovering the dark side of gamification at work: Impacts on engagement and well-being. Journal of Business Research, 122, 256-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.032
  28. Hampel, N., Sassenberg, K., Scholl, A. & Reichenbach, M. (2022). Introducing digital technologies in the factory: Determinants of blue-collar workers’ attitudes towards new robotic tools. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(14), 2973-2987. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1967448
  29. Harzer, C. & Ruch, W. (2012). The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(5), 965-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9364-0
  30. Helzer, E. G. & Kim, S. H. (2019). Creativity for workplace well-being. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(2), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0141
  31. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  32. Hirschi, A. (2012). Callings and work engagement: Moderated mediation model of work meaningfulness, occupational identity, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(3), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028949
  33. Jawad, M., Naz, M. & Rizwan, S. (2023). Leadership support, innovative work behavior, employee work engagement, and corporate reputation: Examining the effect of female in non-government organizations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 708-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2383
  34. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
  35. Kahn, W. A. & Fellows, S. (2013). Employee engagement and meaningful work. In B. J. Dik, Z. S. Byrne & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace (pp. 105–126). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14183-006
  36. Kyprianides, A. & Easterbrook, M. J. (2020). Social factors boost well-being behind bars: The importance of individual and group ties for prisoner well-being. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 12(1), 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12171
  37. Labrague, L. J. & Obeidat, A. A. (2022). Transformational leadership as a mediator between work–family conflict, nurse-reported patient safety outcomes, and job engagement. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 54(4), 493-500. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12756
  38. Latham, G. P. & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 212-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90021-K
  39. Lips-Wiersma, M., Wright, S. & Dik, B. (2016). Meaningful work: differences among blue, pink-, and white-collar occupations. Career Development International, 21(5), 534-551. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2016-0052
  40. Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  41. May, D. R., Gilson, R. L. & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
  42. Moore, S. Y., Grunberg, L., & Krause, A. J. (2014). The relationship between work and home: Examination of white and blue-collar generational differences in a large US organization. Psychology, 5(15), 1768. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.515183
  43. Napholz, L. (2005). An effectiveness trial to increase psychological well-being and reduce stress among African American blue-collar working women. Psychology of stress, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514549631
  44. Nielsen, K. & Abildgaard, J. S. (2012). The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers. Work & Stress, 26(4), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.733543.
  45. Nimon, K., Shuck, B., Fulmore, J. & Zigarmi, D. (2023). Testing the redundancy between work engagement and job attitudes: A replication and extension of the affective events theory in human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 34(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21464
  46. Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A. & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988
  47. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. & Becker, J.M. (2015), SmartPLS 3. Retrieved from www.smartpls.com. Accepted: 18.08.2023
  48. Roberts, D. R. & Davenport, T. O. (2002). Job engagement: Why it's important and how to improve it. Employment Relations Today, 29(3), 21-29. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/job-engagement-why-important-how-improve/docview/237053133/se-2
  49. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  50. Saari, T., Leinonen, M. & Tapanila, K. (2021). Sources of meaningful work for blue-collar workers. Social Sciences, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11010002
  51. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  52. Seligman, M. E. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster.
  53. Seligman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
  54. Silic, M., Marzi, G., Caputo, A. & Bal, P. M. (2020). The effects of a gamified human resource management system on job satisfaction and engagement. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 260-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12272
  55. Singh, S. & Sharma, N. R. (2018). Self-regulation as a correlate of psychological well-being. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 9(3), 441-444. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/self-regulation-as-correlate-psychological-well/docview/2030127745/se-2, Accepted: 06.09.2023
  56. Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J. & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
  57. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S. & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
  58. Siu, O. L. (2002). Occupational stressors and well‐being among Chinese employees: The role of organisational commitment. Applied Psychology, 51(4), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.t01-1-00106
  59. Sung, M., Yoon, D.-Y. & Han, C. S.-H. (2022). Does job autonomy affect job engagement? Psychological meaningfulness as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 50(5), e11275. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.11275
  60. Telef, B. B. (2013). Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 374-384. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2414.4480
  61. Tesi, A., Aiello, A. & Giannetti, E. (2018). The work-related well-being of social workers: Framing job demands, psychological well-being, and work engagement. Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318757397
  62. Teufer, B. & Grabner-Kräuter, S. (2023). How consumer networks contribute to sustainable mindful consumption and well-being. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 57(2), 757-784. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12536
  63. Toshav-Eichner, N. & Bareket-Bojmel, L. (2022). Yesterday's workers in Tomorrow's world. Personnel Review, 51(5), 1553-1569. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2020-0088
  64. Truss, C., Shantz, A., Soane, E., Alfes, K. & Delbridge, R. (2013). Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual wellbeing: Exploring the evidence, developing the theory. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(14), 2657-2669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.798921
  65. Um, B. & Bardhoshi, G. (2022). Demands, resources, meaningful work, and burnout of counselors-in-training. Counselor Education and Supervision, 61(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12232
  66. Venzin, M. (2020). Understanding motivation: Create meaningful work for volunteers. The Volunteer Management Report, 25(11), 5-5.
  67. Vestling, M., Tufvesson, B. & Iwarsson, S. (2003). Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 35(3), 127-131. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/16501970310010475
  68. Yogamalar, I. & Samuel, A. A. (2019). Job engagement, psychological well-being and organisational commitment: An empirical test of direct and indirect effects. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 20(3), 392-414. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2019.102717
  69. Warshawsky, N. E., Havens, D. S. & Knafl, G. (2012). The influence of interpersonal relationships on nurse managers' work engagement and proactive work behavior. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(9), 418-425. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182668129
  70. West, A. (2023). Meaningful work and unethical work: The crisis in Australian financial advice. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(3), 882-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12531
  71. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
  72. Yuan, Z., Li, Y. & Tetrick, L. E. (2015). Job hindrances, job resources, and safety performance: The mediating role of job engagement. Applied Ergonomics, 51, 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.04.
  73. Göçen, A. & Terzi, R. (2019). Eğitim örgütleri için Anlamlı İş ölçeği. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39 (3), 1487-1512.
  74. Lips-Wiersma, M., Wright, S. & Dik, B. (2016). Meaningful work: differences among blue, pink-, and white-collar occupations. Career Development International, 21(5), 534-551. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2016-0052