We would like to present the PET/CT images of the patient with diagnosis of intra-arterial injection of FDG via hand dorsum.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Seventy four years old female patient with diagnosis of lymphoma attended for F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in order to decide treatment response.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Observation of the PET/CT images demonstrated that the injection was intra-arterial.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We would like to present the PET/CT images of the patient with diagnosis of intra-arterial injection of FDG via hand dorsum.
Seventy four years old female patient with diagnosis of lymphoma attended for F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in order to decide treatment response. The intravenous line of the patient was inserted from the right hand dorsum and injection of the radiopharmaceutical and saline flush was performed sufficiently without suspicion of extravasations. Observation of the PET/CT images demonstrated that the injection was intra-arterial. We would like to present the PET/CT images of the patient with diagnosis of intra-arterial injection of FDG via hand dorsum.
KOÇ, Z. P., KARA, P. Ö., OLGUN, O. (2023). Interesting Image of the Intraarterial Injection of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Via Hand Dorsum. Molecular Oncologic Imaging, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 9–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/961828
Bielack, S. S., Kempf-Bielack, B., Delling, G., Exner, G. U., Flege, S., Helmke, K., Kotz, R., Salzer-Kuntschik, M., Werner, M., Winkelmann, W., Zoubek, A., Jürgens, H., & Winkler, K. (2002). Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 20(3), 776–790. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.776 Vota J. PET physics lectures for nuclear medicine physicians Atlanta, GA: Emory University, 2006
Bybel, B., Kwok, P., & Neumann, D. R. (2003). Arterial injection artifact on F-18 FDG positron emission tomographic scan. Clinical nuclear medicine, 28(4), 350. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RLU.0000057568.56798.6C
Kumar K. (2009). Abnormally increased uptake of 18F-FDG in the forearm and hand following intra-arterial injection -- hot forearm and hot hand signs. The British journal of radiology, 82(984), 995–999. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/62898427
Shreve, P. D., Anzai, Y., & Wahl, R. L. (1999). Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 19(1), 61–151. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.1.g99ja0761
Kumar K. (2009). Abnormally increased uptake of 18F-FDG in the forearm and hand following intra-arterial injection -- hot forearm and hot hand signs. The British journal of radiology, 82(984), 995–999. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/62898427
Andrews, G. A., Theocheung, J. L., Andrews, E., & Tyler, K. R. (1980). Unintentional intra-arterial injection of a bone-imaging agent. Clinical nuclear medicine, 5(11), 499–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-198011000-00005
Zhu, Z., Doss, M., Tan, H., Feigenberg, S., & Yu, J. Q. (2011). Inadvertent intraarterial injection of ¹⁸F-FDG: a case report and literature review of hot forearm and hot hand signs. Journal of nuclear medicine technology, 39(4), 249–251. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.111.089011