Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 5

Looking through the Parental Glasses: Delving into the Management Skills of School Management from the Perspective of Educator Parents

Pages
81–97
Publication Date
2023-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, six themes and 46 codes emerged.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research examines the management skills of school management (SM) from the perspective of educator parents (EP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 12 EPs from 10 different provinces of Turkey were interviewed via the internet.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, six themes and 46 codes emerged.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:School principal · school management · educator parents

Abstract

This research examines the management skills of school management (SM) from the perspective of educator parents (EP). Examining the SMs’ management skills of the children of EPs, who have both educator and parent roles, is the main focus of the research. The phenomenon of the research, the management skills of SM, and the opinions of an experienced group of educators and parents were taken to investigate this phenomenon in depth. Because of this basic structure of the research phenomenology design was used in the research. The data of the research was collected through a semi-structured interview form. A total of 12 EPs from 10 different provinces of Turkey were interviewed via the internet. The criterion sampling method was used in the selection of the research group and it was aimed to have maximum variation. Interviews were analyzed through content analysis. According to the results of the research, six themes and 46 codes emerged. These themes were school management (f=40), problem solving methods (f=38), student management (f=31), school principal features (f=31), parent management (f=26) and decision processes (f =26) are listed as. As a recommendation, SM should be seen as a professional profession and SPs should be professionally trained. Communication skills, conflict and crisis management, student management, parent management and effective decision-making processes should be taken into consideration in SP education processes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERANIL, A. K. (2023). Looking through the Parental Glasses: Delving into the Management Skills of School Management from the Perspective of Educator Parents. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 5, 81–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/961167

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akça, F., & Yaman, B. (2009). Okul yöneticilerinin problem çözme davranışlarını etkileyen faktörleri incelemeye yönelik bir çalışma [A study on the examination of the factors affecting the problem-solving behaviors of school directors]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, [Kastamonu Education Journal]17,3,767-780 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefdergi/issue/49068/626080
  2. Akert, N., & Martin, B. N. (2012). The role of teacher leaders in school improvement through the perceptions of principals and teachers. International Journal of Education, 4(4), 284-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ije.v4i4.2290
  3. Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A review of leadership theories, principles and styles and their relevance to educational management. Management, 5(1), 6-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.mm.20150501.02
  4. Argon, T. (2015). Teacher and administrator views on school principals’ accountability. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(4),925-944. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.4.2467
  5. Bakioğlu, A., & Demiral, S. (2013). Okul yöneticilerinin belirsizlik durumlarını algılama ve karar verme tarzları [School managements’ perception of uncertainty situations and their decision-making styles]. Journal of Educational Sciences, 38, 9-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.15285/EBD.2013385564
  6. Brown, D. W., Carr, R. E., Perry, C. M., & McIntire, W. G. (1996). Principals' perceptions of community and staff involvement in shared decision making. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12, 17-24.
  7. Çetin, N., & Bostancı, A. B. (2011). İlköğretim okullarında okul yöneticilerinin öğretmenler arasındaki farklılıkları yönetme durumu [School managers’ management situation of the differences among the teachers in primary schools]. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 1(2), 6-15. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/suje/issue/20628/219945
  8. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. K., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design and analysis. (Aypay, A. Translation Ed.). Ankara:
  9. Anı Publishing. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Mixed research methods-qualitative and quantitative research design according five approaches. (M. Bütün; S. B. Demir, Translation Ed.). Ankara:
  10. Siyasal Publishing. Crow, G. M., Hausman, C. S., & Scribner, J. P. (2002). Reshaping the role of the school principal. Teachers College Record, 104(9), 189-210.
  11. Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). Developing successful principals. Stanford Educational Leadership Institute, Retrieved from: chrome-exten