Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 6

The Determination of History Teacher Candidates' Distance Education Self-Efficacy Belief Levels According to Different Variables

Pages
266–281
Publication Date
2023-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to these, it was investigated whether pre-service teachers' online readiness level was related to self-efficacy belief level and a positive relationship was found between readiness level and self-efficacy belief level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Distance education is a type in which individuals can realize their learning activities in line with their current technological possibilities, independent of time and space concepts, sharing information and documents with technological tools and applications, and establishing communication and interaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of the research, two different scales were used with 109 history teacher candidates from different grade levels of 4 different state universities with the appropriate or convenient sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to these, it was investigated whether pre-service teachers' online readiness level was related to self-efficacy belief level and a positive relationship was found between readiness level and self-efficacy belief level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distance education · Self-efficacy · Belief

Abstract

Distance education is a type in which individuals can realize their learning activities in line with their current technological possibilities, independent of time and space concepts, sharing information and documents with technological tools and applications, and establishing communication and interaction. Self-efficacy is knowing and believing in one's abilities to do a job. Self-efficacy belief levels towards online learning environments are important factors affecting the educational process. For this reason, determining students' self-efficacy levels in distance education processes is accepted as an essential factor in increasing the quality of educational activities. This study aimed to determine the distance education self-efficacy belief levels of prospective history teachers and the distance education self-efficacy belief levels according to variables such as readiness, gender, grade, and disadvantage. Within the scope of the research, two different scales were used with 109 history teacher candidates from different grade levels of 4 different state universities with the appropriate or convenient sampling method. As a result of the research, no significant difference was found in readiness, gender, and grade variables. Another finding of the study was that disadvantages such as mobile data and internet problems had a negative effect on self-efficacy belief levels. In addition to these, it was investigated whether pre-service teachers' online readiness level was related to self-efficacy belief level and a positive relationship was found between readiness level and self-efficacy belief level.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNÇEKİÇ, A., BİRBUDAK, T. S. (2023). The Determination of History Teacher Candidates' Distance Education Self-Efficacy Belief Levels According to Different Variables. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 6, 266–281. https://ajindex.com/articles/1015413

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akıncı, M & Pişkin Tunç, M. (2021). The problems encountered by pre-service mathematics teachers in distance education practices and solution suggestions. EKEV Academy Journal, 23(85): 359-376.
  2. Aksoy, D., Sancaklı, S., & Adagideli, F.H. (2022). Investigation of preschool teacher candidates’ self‐efficacy levels and their readiness levels for the teaching profession. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(2): 167‐185. Aktamış, H., Özenoğlu Kiremit, H. & Kubilay, M. (2016). Investigation of students' self-efficacy beliefs according to science achievements and demographic characteristics. Adnan Menderes University Education Faculty Journal of Education Sciences, 7(2): 1-10.
  3. Altunçekiç, A. (2022). Developing a distance education self-efficacy belief scale: a validity and reliability study. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1): 349-361.
  4. Aşkar, P. and Umay, A. (2001). Perceived computer self-efficacy of the students in the elementary mathematics teaching programme. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21: 1-8.
  5. Aydemir, M. (2018). Uzaktan eğitim program, ders ve materyal tasarımı. [Distance education programme, course and material design] Ankara:
  6. Eğitim Publishing. Aygin, D. & Gül, A. (2023). COVID-19 and distance learning. Gazi Journal of Health Sciences, 8(1): 11-21.
  7. Bağrıaçık Yılmaz, A. & Karataş, S. (2020). Basic concepts, theories and philosophy of open and distance learning. Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenme. [Open and Distance Learning]. Serçin Karataş, Ebru Kılıç Çakmak (Ed.), Ankara: Pegem Academy: 2-29.
  8. Bakırcı, H., Doğdu, N. & Artun, H., (2021). Investigation of professional achievements and problems of science teachers in the distance education process of covid-19 pandemic period. Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 7 (2): 640-658.
  9. Baltacı, A. (2018). A conceptual review of sampling methods and sample size problems in qualitative research. Journal of Bitlis Eren University Institute of Social Sciences, 7 (1): 231-274.
  10. Becerikli, S. (2021). Teacher training by correspondence course. Belgi, 21: 279-299.
  11. Bektaş, H. & Kablan, Z. (2023). Teachers’ opinions on professional development activities conducted through distance education, AJER-Academia Journal of Educational Research, 8(1): 1-22.
  12. Can, E. (2020). Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic and pedagogical reflections: Open and distance education practices in Turkey. Journal of Open Education Applications and Research, 6(2): 11-53. Chaplain,