Journals / Art-Sanat Dergisi / 2023 / Sayı: 20

The Iconographic Evaluation of A Group of Reliquary Crosses Depicting The Virgin and Christ-Child from The Halûk Perk Museum

Halûk Perk Müzesi’nden Meryem ve Çocuk İsa Betimli Bir Grup Röliker Haçın İkonografik Bakımdan Değerlendirilmesi

Ceren Ünal(CELÂL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1563-735X
Zeynep Çakmakçı(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8599-0204
Pages
669–703
Publication Date
2023-07-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The reliquary crosses in the collection were comparatively analysed and evaluated in the light of the different views and interpretations of iconographers on the types of the Virgin in Byzantine art.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Halûk Perk Museum in Istanbul is notable for its large collection of reliquary crosses with a rich iconographic diversity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article focuses on 14 reliquary crosses depicting the Virgin with Christ-child, selected from this valuable collection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The reliquary crosses in the collection were comparatively analysed and evaluated in the light of the different views and interpretations of iconographers on the types of the Virgin in Byzantine art.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Halûk Perk Müzesi · Haç · Röliker Haç

Abstract

The Halûk Perk Museum in Istanbul is notable for its large collection of reliquary crosses with a rich iconographic diversity. This article focuses on 14 reliquary crosses depicting the Virgin with Christ-child, selected from this valuable collection. It is possible to see various types of the Virgin, such as Blachernitissa, Kyriotissa, Hodegetria, Nikopoios and Episkepsis, which are used in different examples of Byzantine art, on the reliquary crosses. In our study, five different iconographic types of the Virgin were identified among the reliquary crosses in the collection. The densest group among these are those depicting the Virgin Blachernitissa with 7 examples. Among the reliquary crosses, there is a rare example that we have identified as the Virgin Episkepsis and another example that we are discussing whether it is Kyriotissa or not. In addition, in the study, was drawn attention to the presence of different iconographic types of the types of Virgin on the reliquary crosses, which are not seen in different types of works of Byzantine art, but can be seen on reliquary crosses. 14 reliquary crosses, which are presented in detail in the catalog, 13 of them with engraving technique, date back to the 11th centurywith analogical and iconographic evaluations; In a single example with relief technique, it belongs to the 11th-12th century. The reliquary crosses in the collection were comparatively analysed and evaluated in the light of the different views and interpretations of iconographers on the types of the Virgin in Byzantine art.

Özet

İstanbul’da bulunan Halûk Perk Müzesi, zengin bir ikonografik çeşitliliğe sahip çok sayıdaki röliker haç koleksiyonuyla dikkat çekmektedir. Makalede, bu değerli koleksiyondan seçilmiş Meryem ve çocuk İsa betimli 14 adet röliker haç konu edilmektedir. Bizans sanatının farklı örneklerinde kullanılan Meryem Blakhernitissa, Kyriotissa, Hodegetria, Nikopois ve Episkepis gibi çeşitli Meryem tiplerini, röliker haçlarda da görmek mümkündür. Çalışmada koleksiyonda yer alan röliker haçlar içerisinde beş farklı Meryem tipi tespit edilmiştir. Bunlar arasındaki en yoğun grup 7 örnekle Meryem Blakhernitissa betimli olanlardır. Röliker haçlar içinde Meryem Episkepsis olarak tanımlanan ender bir örnek ile yine Kyriotissa olup olmadığı tartışılan bir örnek daha bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca çalışmada, Bizans sanatının farklı türdeki eserlerinde karşımıza çıkmayan ancak röliker haçlar üzerinde görülen farklı Meryem tiplerinin varlığına da dikkat çekilmiştir. Makalenin katalog kısmında ayrıntılı sunulan 14 adet röliker haçtan, kazıma teknikli 13 adeti analojik ve ikonografik değerlendirmelerle 11. yüzyıla; kabartma teknikli tek bir örnekte ise 11-12. yüzyıla tarihlendirilmiştir. Koleksiyondaki röliker haçlar Bizans sanatındaki Meryem tipleri hakkında ikonografi uzmanlarının yaptıkları farklı görüş ve yorumlar eşliğinde karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenerek değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ünal, C., Çakmakçı, Z. (2023). The Iconographic Evaluation of A Group of Reliquary Crosses Depicting The Virgin and Christ-Child from The Halûk Perk Museum. Art-Sanat Dergisi, Sayı: 20, 669–703. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2023.20.1289947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Altun, Feride İ. Kuşadası, Kadıkalesi/Anaia Kazısı 2001-2012 Sezonu Bizans Küçük Buluntuları. Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, 2015. google scholar
  2. Aydın, Ayşe. “Reliqienkreuze Im Museum Von Ankara (Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi).” Sanat Tarihi Dergisi 12 (2003): 25-40. google scholar
  3. Bulgurlu, Vera. İstanbul Arkeoloji Müzeleri’ndeki Bizans Kurşun Mühürleri. İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 2007. google scholar
  4. Carr, Annemarie Weyl. “Virgin Mary.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. C. 3. Ed. Alexander P. Kazdhan. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 2173-2176. google scholar
  5. Carr, Annemarie Weyl. “Thoughts on Mary East and West.” Images of the Mother of God. Ed. Maria Vassilaki. Norfolk: Ashgate Yayınları, 2005, 277-292. google scholar
  6. Cheynet, Jean-Claude, Turan Gökyıldırım ve Vera Bulgurlu, Les Sceaux Byzantins du Musee Archeologique d’Istanbul. İstanbul: İstanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, 2012. google scholar
  7. Cotsonis, John A. “The Virgin Lysiponos (“The Deliverer From Pain”) on A Byzantine Lead Seal and The Transformation of A Marian Epithet,” Byzantion 87 (2017): 159-179. google scholar
  8. Cronnier, Estelle. “Eastern Christianity and Relics of Saints: From Refusal to Quest,” Rome, Constantinople and Newly-Converted Europe. Archaeological and Historical Evidence. C. 2. Ed. Majiej Solomon ve Marcin Woloszyn ve Alexander Musin ve Perica Spehar. Krakov- Leipzig-Rzesz6w-Varşova: Leipziger Universitatsverlag, 2012, 25-32. google scholar
  9. Dabrowska, Elzbieta. “Le Depot de Reliques Dans Les Sepultures-Usage Liturgique ou Superstition?,” Rome, Constantinople and Newly-Converted Europe. Archaeological and Historical Evidence. C. 2. Ed. Majiej Solomon ve Marcin Woloszyn ve Alexander Musin ve Perica Spehar. Krakov- Leipzig- Rzesz6w-Varşova: Leipziger Universitatsverlag, 2012, 33-60. google scholar
  10. Davidson, Gladys R. Corinth, XII, The Minor Objects. Princeton: American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1952. google scholar
  11. Frazer, Margeret E. ve Anthony Cutler. “Reliquary.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. C. 1. Ed. Alexander P. Kazdhan. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 1782-1783. google scholar
  12. Galavaris, George P. “The Mother of God of the Kanikleion.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 2/2 (1959): 177-182. google scholar
  13. Galavaris, George P. “The Mother of God, Stabbed with a Knife.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 13 (1959): 229-233. google scholar
  14. Galavaris, George P. “Seals of the Byzantine Empire.” Archaeology 12/4 (1959): 264-270. google scholar
  15. Grierson, Philip. Catalogue of the Byzantine Coins in the Dumbarton Oaks Collection and in the Whittemore Collection, Volume Three, Part 2. Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library & Collection, 1993. google scholar
  16. Hormckovâ, Katerina. “The Byzantine Reliquary Pectoral Crosses in Central Europe.” Byzantinoslavica LX (1999): 213-250. google scholar
  17. Jeffery, Hugh G. “Reliquary Crosses from Middle Byzantine Aphrodisias: Intimacy and Archaeology.” Anatolian Studies 73 (2023): 193-218. google scholar
  18. Kirchhainer, Karin. “IV. Metali, Kreuze, KreuzfüBe und Pektorale aus Buntmetall”. Spatantike und Byzanz. Bestandskatalog Badisches Landesmuseum Karlsruhe, Objekte aus Bein, Elfenbein, Glas, Keramik, Metall und Stein. Byzanz zwischen Orient und Okzident, Band 8.1, Ed. Falko Daim, Benjamin Fourlas, Katarina Horst ve Vasiliki Tsamakda. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 2017, 59-73. google scholar
  19. Leontiades, Ioannis G. Lead Seals in the Museum of Byzantine Culture, Thessalonike, Byzantine Text and Studies. Selanik: Museum of Byzantine Culture, 2006. (AsovnaSnç Iroavvpç r, MoXufi8ofiouXXa tou Mouaeıou BuZavTivou nohma^ou 0eaaaXoviKnç, BuZavTiva Ksipsva Kaı ps^sıaı, ©sooataoviK'r]: Ksvıpov BvZavııvrov Epsvvrov, 2006) google scholar
  20. Lucie-Smith, Edward. The Thames and Hudson Dictionary of Art Terms. Londra: Thames and Hudson, 1984. google scholar
  21. Musin, Alexander. “Byzantine Reliquary-Crosses from the Territory of Turkey in the Archaeological Context. An Evidence of Post-Iconoclasm Piety?.” Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress of Byzantine Studies. C. 2. Ed. Iliya Iliev ve Elena Kostova ve Viladimir Angelov. Sofya: Bulgarian Historical Heritage Foundation, 2011, 170-171. google scholar
  22. Musin, Alexander. “Byzantine Reliquary -Crosses in the Formation of Medieval Christian Culture in Europe.” Rome, Constantinople and Newly-Converted Europe. Archaeological and Historical Evidence. C. 2. Ed. Majiej Solomon ve Marcin Woloszyn ve Alexander Musin ve Perica Spehar. Krakov- Leipzig- Rzesz6w-Varşova: Leipziger Universitatsverlag, 2012, 61-94. google scholar
  23. Nesbitt, John W. Catalogue of Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and in the Fogg Museum of Art. C. 6. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2009. google scholar
  24. Oikonomides, Nicolas. A Colleciton of Dated Byzantine Seals. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1986. google scholar
  25. Ott, Jeremy J. ve Natalia Poulou Papadimitriou ve Elli Tzavella. “Reliquaries and Reliquary Crosses in Byzantine Greece.” Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress of Byzantine Studies. C. 2. Ed. Iliya Iliev ve Elena Kostova ve Viladimir Angelov. Sofya: Bulgarian Historical Heritage Foundation, 2011, 170. google scholar
  26. Pentcheva, Bissera. “Visual Textuality: The “Logos” as Pregnant Body and Building.” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 45 (2004): 225-238. google scholar
  27. Pentcheva, Bissera V. Icons and Power: The Mother of God in Byzantium. Pensilvanya: Pensilvanya Devlet Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2006. google scholar
  28. Peskova, Anna. “Byzantine Pendant Reliquary Crosses From the Territory of Medieval Rus.” Rome, Constantinople and Newly-Converted Europe. Archaeological and Historical Evidence. C. 2. Ed. google scholar
  29. Majiej Solomon ve Marcin Woloszyn ve Alexander Musin ve Perica Spehar. Krakov- Leipzig-Rzesz6w-Varşova: Leipziger Universitatsverlag, 2012, 403-443. google scholar
  30. Peskova, Anna ve Liudmila Strokova, Christian Antiquities of Byzantium in the “Syrian Collection” of Bogdan Khanenko And Varvara Khanenko. St. Petersburg-Kiev: St. Petersburg Centre for Oriental Studies Publishers, 2012. google scholar
  31. Piatnitsky, Yuri, Oriana Baddeley, Earleen Brunner ve Marlia M. Mango. Sinai, Byzantium, Russia: Orthodox Art from the Sixth to the Twentieth Century. Londra: Saint Catherine Foundation / The State Hermitage Museum, 2000. google scholar
  32. Pitarakis, Brigitte. “Female Piety in Context.” Images of the Mother of God. Ed. Maria Vassilaki._Ashgate Yayınları, 2005, 153-166_ google scholar
  33. Pitarakis, Brigitte. Les Croix-ReliquairesPectoralesByzantines en Bronze, Bibliotheque des Cahiers Archeologiques XVI. Paris: Picard Edition, 2006. google scholar
  34. Pitarakis, Brigitte ve Christos Merantzas. Parıldayan Hatıralar. İstanbul: Sadberk Hanım Müzesi, 2006. google scholar
  35. Pitarakis, Brigitte. “197. Pectoral Reliquary Cross.” Byzantium 330-1453. Ed. Robin Cormack ve Maria Vassilaki. Londra: Royal Academy of Arts, 2008, 226, 429. google scholar
  36. Pitarakis, Brigitte. “147. Pectoral Reliquary Cross.” Heaven & Earth. Ed. Anastasia Drandaki ve Demetra Papanikola-Bakirtzi ve Anastasi Tourta. Atina: Benaki Museum, 2014, 268-269. google scholar
  37. Podskalsky, Gerhard. “Theotokos.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, C. 3. Ed. Alexander P. Kazdhan. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 2070. google scholar
  38. Pülz, Andrea M. “Images on Byzantine Small Finds from Ephesos,” Ephesos from Late Antiquity until the Late Middle Ages, Österreichisches Archaologisches Institut Sonderschriften Band 58. Ed. Sabine Ladstatter ve Paul Magdalino. Viyana: Verlag Holzhausen, 2019. google scholar
  39. Rosenau, Helen. “The Prototype of the Virgin and Child in the Book of Kells.” The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs 83/486 (1943): 228-231. google scholar
  40. Sandrovskaja Valentina S. ve Werner Seibt. Byzantinische Bleisiegel der Staatlichen Eremitage mit Familiennamen, BandX/1. Teil Sammlung Lichacev-Namen von A bis I. Viyana: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2005. google scholar
  41. Schmidt, Christian. “254.Reliquienkreuz,” Die Welt von Byzanz- Europas östliches Erbe: Glanz, Krisen und Fortleben einer tausendjahrigen Kultur. Münih: Archâologische Staatssammlung München, 2004, 192. google scholar
  42. Sear, David R. Byzantine Coins and Their Values. Londra: Seaby, 2006. google scholar
  43. Sevcenko, Nancy P “Virgin Blachernitissa.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. C. 3. Ed. Alexander P. Kazdhan. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 2170-2171. google scholar
  44. Sevcenko, Nancy P. “Virgin Nikopoios.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. C. 3. Ed. Alexander P. Kazdhan. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 2176. google scholar
  45. Sevcenko, Nancy P. “Virgin Platytera.” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. C. 3. Ed. Alexander P. Kazdhan. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 2177. google scholar
  46. Skhirtladze, Zaza. “The Image of the Virgin on the Sinai Hexaptych and the Apse Mosaic of Hagia Sophia, Constantinople.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 68 (2014): 369-386. google scholar
  47. Taft, Robert Francis ve Alexander Kazhdan. “Relics,” The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, C. 1. Ed. Alexander P. Kazdhan. New York: Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1991, 1779-1781. google scholar
  48. Teteriatnikov, Natalia B. “The Image of the Virgin Zoodochos Pege: Two Questions Concerning Its Origin.” Images of the Mother of God, Perceptions of the Theotokos in Byzantium. Ed. Maria Vassilaki. New York: Routledge, 2016, 225-238. google scholar
  49. Ünlüer, Yakup. Kapadokya Bölgesi Müzelerindeki Bizans Dönemine Ait Madeni Haçlar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, 2019. google scholar
  50. Wassiliou, Alexandra-Kyriaki ve Werner Seibt, Die Byzantinischen Bleisiegel in Österreich, Band II/2.Teil Zentral und Provinzialverwaultung. Viyana: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2004. google scholar
  51. Weis, Adolf. Die Madonna Platytera, Entwurf für ein Christentum als Bildoffenbarung anhand der Geschichte eines Madonnenthemas. Königstein im Taunus: Verlag Langewiesche, 1985. google scholar