Journals / Uluslararası İnsan ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: E.Ş. Özel Sayısı

Physical Education and Sports Teachers’ Curriculum Literacy and Education Efficiancy Levels

Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenlerinde Eğitim Programı Okuryazarlık ve Öğretim Yeterlik Düzeyleri

Pages
11–26
Publication Date
2023-08-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, a significant difference was determined between both the education program literacy levels and physical education teaching proficiency levels of physical education and sports teachers according to the graduated department variable (p>0.001), on the other hand, a statistically significant difference was determined between the education program literacy levels of physical education and sports teacher candidates according to their academic achievements (p>0.001).In addition, while it was observed that there was a negative significant relationship between physical education and sports teachers' physical education teaching proficiency scores and the variable of professional seniority (r=0.001), it was determined that there was a positive significant relationship between the education program literacy levels and the academic achievement level variable in teacher candidates (r=0.001).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the education program literacy levels and physical education teaching proficiency levels of physical education and sports teachers and teacher candidates according to some variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of a total of 234 participants (106 (45.3%) teacher candidates in Uludağ University Physical Education and Sports Department and 128 (54.7%) physical education and sports teachers working in primary and secondary schools in the central districts of Bursa).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, a significant difference was determined between both the education program literacy levels and physical education teaching proficiency levels of physical education and sports teachers according to the graduated department variable (p>0.001), on the other hand, a statistically significant difference was determined between the education program literacy levels of physical education and sports teacher candidates according to their academic achievements (p>0.001).In addition, while it was observed that there was a negative significant relationship between physical education and sports teachers' physical education teaching proficiency scores and the variable of professional seniority (r=0.001), it was determined that there was a positive significant relationship between the education program literacy levels and the academic achievement level variable in teacher candidates (r=0.001).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:beden eğitimi ve spor · eğitim programı · program okuryazarlığı

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the education program literacy levels and physical education teaching proficiency levels of physical education and sports teachers and teacher candidates according to some variables. The study group consisted of a total of 234 participants (106 (45.3%) teacher candidates in Uludağ University Physical Education and Sports Department and 128 (54.7%) physical education and sports teachers working in primary and secondary schools in the central districts of Bursa). Curriculum literacy scale and physical education teaching proficiency scale were used as data collection tools. Independent Sample T-test and One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for categorical variables in data analysis; Pearson Product Moment Correlation Analysis method was used in the correlation analysis between the scores obtained from the scales. According to the results of the research, a significant difference was determined between both the education program literacy levels and physical education teaching proficiency levels of physical education and sports teachers according to the graduated department variable (p>0.001), on the other hand, a statistically significant difference was determined between the education program literacy levels of physical education and sports teacher candidates according to their academic achievements (p>0.001).In addition, while it was observed that there was a negative significant relationship between physical education and sports teachers' physical education teaching proficiency scores and the variable of professional seniority (r=0.001), it was determined that there was a positive significant relationship between the education program literacy levels and the academic achievement level variable in teacher candidates (r=0.001).

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerinin ve öğretmen adaylarının eğitim programı okuryazarlık düzeylerinin ve beden eğitimi öğretim yeterlik düzeylerinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesidir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, 2017-18 eğitim öğretim dönemi içinde Uludağ Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bölümündeki 106 (%45,3) öğretmen adayı ile Bursa ili merkez ilçelerindeki ilk ve ortaokullarda çalışan 128 (%54,7) beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmeni olmak üzere toplam 234 katılımcı oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama araçları olarak, eğitim programı okuryazarlığı ölçeği ile beden eğitimi öğretim yeterliği ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde kategorik değişkenler için Bağımsız Örneklem T testi ve Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi (ANOVA); ölçeklerden alınan puanlar arasındaki korelasyon analizinde ise Pearson Çarpım Moment Korelasyon Analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucuna göre, Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerin hem eğitim programı okuryazarlık düzeyleri hem de beden eğitimi öğretim yeterlik düzeyleri arasında mezun olunan bölüm değişkenine göre anlamlı fark belirlenirken(p>0.001), beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmen adaylarının ise, eğitim programı okuryazarlık düzeyleri arasında akademik başarılarına göre istatistiksel düzeyde anlamlı farklılık belirlenmiştir(p>0.001). Ayrıca beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerinin beden eğitimi öğretim yeterlik puanları ile mesleki kıdem değişkeni arasında negatif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu görülürken (r=0.001), öğretmen adaylarında ise eğitim programı okuryazarlık düzeyleri ile akademik başarı düzeyi değişkeni arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir(r=0.001).

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLPEK, U., ŞAHİN, Ş. K. (2023). Physical Education and Sports Teachers’ Curriculum Literacy and Education Efficiancy Levels. Uluslararası İnsan ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: E.Ş. Özel Sayısı, 11–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/957977

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. AB Kadir, MA (2018). An inquiry into critical thinking in the Australian curriculum: examining its conceptual understandings and their implications on developing critical thinking as a “general capability” on teachers’ practice and knowledge. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(4), 533-549.
  2. Akınoğlu O ve Doğan S (2012). “Eğitimde program geliştirme alanına yeni bir kavram önerisi: Program okuryazarlığı.’’ 21. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, 12-14.
  3. Alsubaie, MA (2016). Curriculum Development: Teacher Involvement in Curriculum Development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106-107.
  4. Aslan, S (2019). An Analysis of Prospective Teachers' Curriculum Literacy Levels in Terms of Reading and Writing. Universal Journal of Educationa lResearch, 7(4),973-979.
  5. Aslan S, Gürlen E (2019). Üç boyutlu sanal öğrenme ortamında 5. Sınıf düzeyinde kesirlerin öğretimi: Second life örneği. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 171-186.
  6. Balay, R (2004). Küreselleşme, bilgi toplumu ve eğitim. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 61-82.
  7. Bharvad, AJ (2010). Curriculum evaluation. International Research Journal, 1(12),72-74.
  8. Bolat, Y (2017). Concept of curriculum literacy and curriculum literacy scale. International Periodical for the Languages. Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(18),121-138.
  9. Boote, DN (2006). Teachers’ Professional discretion and the curricula. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 12(4),461-478.
  10. Bümen, NT (2019). Türkiye’de Merkeziyetçiliğe Karşı Özerklik Kıskacında Eğitim Programları: Sorunlar ve Öneriler. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(1), 175-185.
  11. Büyükkaragöz SS, Cuma Ç (1997). “Genel Öğretim Metotları.’’ İstanbul:
  12. Öz Eğitim Yayınları.
  13. Çetinkaya S, Tabak S (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim programı okuryazarlık yeterlilikleri. On Dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 296-309.
  14. Demirci PT, Çınar İ, Demirci N (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin özel eğitime gereksinim duyan öğrencilerde beden eğitimi ders programından ve kaynaştırma eğitiminden kaynaklanan sorunlarının incelenmesi. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2014(2),136-150.
  15. Demirhan GY, Bulca F, Altay R, Şahin A, Güvenç A, Aslan A,., Açıkada C (2008). Beden eğitimi öğretim programları ve programların yürütülmesine ilişkin paydaş görüşlerinin karşılaştırılması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(3), 157-180.
  16. Edginton CR, Mingkai C, Demirhan G (2010). Beden eğitimi ve sağlık: yeni bir küresel görüş birliği. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi,