Journals / Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1

EXAMINATION OF EARLY CHILDHOOD TEACHERS’ CREATIVE THINKING TENDENCIES AND CRITICAL THINKING IN DESIGN BASED ACTIVITIES

Pages
84–102
Publication Date
2023-07-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Providing teachers with professional development can contribute positively to the implementation of design based activities supporting creativity and critical thinking.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Creativity and critical thinking are important goals of early childhood curriculum.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The quantitative data examined 88 early childhood teachers’ creativity by using Marmara Creative Thinking Tendency Scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Providing teachers with professional development can contribute positively to the implementation of design based activities supporting creativity and critical thinking.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Early childhood · creativity · critical thinking

Özet

Creativity and critical thinking are important goals of early childhood curriculum. There are various ways to support these important goals. In the context of this study, our goal is to determine the views of early childhood teachers based on design-based activities. Mixed method was used in the study. The quantitative data examined 88 early childhood teachers’ creativity by using Marmara Creative Thinking Tendency Scale. Creativity scores of the teachers differed significantly according to the variables of age, gender and educational level. These scores were grouped as low-medium-high to select 12 teachers for interviews. The interview analysis revealed that the teachers did not provide examples directly related design while expressing their ideas on creativity, development areas and critical thinking. When the teachers' examples related to design were examined, teachers mostly included examples from science education. In the last step of the study, the activity plans taken from the three teachers who participated in the interview were examined. When planning design-based activities, teachers included a plan based on the age group of the students and clearly determine the materials to be used. However, teachers did not discuss design parameters and data collection that are critical to support creativity and critical thinking. Design is a relatively new field at early childhood education. Providing teachers with professional development can contribute positively to the implementation of design based activities supporting creativity and critical thinking.

🔖

Cite This Article

AR, G. A., DELEN, İ. (2023). EXAMINATION OF EARLY CHILDHOOD TEACHERS’ CREATIVE THINKING TENDENCIES AND CRITICAL THINKING IN DESIGN BASED ACTIVITIES. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 84–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/953025

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., & Pantoya, M. L. (2016). Engineering literacy and engagement in kindergarten classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 630-654.
  2. Alves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Xavier, C., Hoffman, G., & Paiva, A. (2022). Creativity landscapes: Systematic review spanning 70 years of creativity interventions for children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 16-40. Author 2 and colleague (2022a). Author 2 and colleague (2022b).
  3. Awang, H. & Ramly, I. (2008). “Through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom”, International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 2(4), 18–23.
  4. Bartholomew, S. R., Moon, C., Ruesch, E. Y., & Strimel, G. J. (2019). Kindergarten Student's Approaches to Resolving Open-Ended Design Tasks. Journal of Technology Education, 30(2), 90-115.
  5. Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2016). Exploring the field of computational thinking as a 21st century skill. In EDULEARN16 Proceedings (pp. 4725-4733).
  6. IATED. Chantal, P. L., & Markovits, H. (2017). The capacity to generate alternative ideas is more important than inhibition for logical reasoning in preschool-age children. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 208-220.
  7. Claro, M., & Ananiadou, K. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers. Craft, A. (2003). Creative Thinking in The Early Years of Education. Early Years, 23(2), 143– 154. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of advanced nursing, 26(3), 623-630.
  8. Creswell, J. W. ve Creswell, J. D. (2021). Araştırma tasarımı: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları (5. Basımdan Çeviri), E. Karadağ (Çev.), Ankara:
  9. Nobel Yayıncılık. Çoban, Ç. (2016). Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinin Yaratıcılık Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi,
  10. Uşak. DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field methods, 23(2), 136-155. Design and technology programmes of study (2013). Key stage 3. Department for Education. Ekinci, Ö., & Aybek, B. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının empatik ve eleştirel düşünme