Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning / 2023 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS AND ACCESSIBILITY

Pages
253–268
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The surplus of “converted special education buildings” in our country and this building group being suitable for the requirements of special education students, and all their requirements are planned from the ground up, and what can be done to make the existing converted buildings affordable with the least cost, designing an accessible and barrier-free special education building were the focal points of the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In special education and rehabilitation buildings, where physically and mentally disabled individuals receive education and develop some social skills to integrate themselves into social life, many problems are faced depending on the design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reasons for this are the inadequacy of architectural solutions, the lack of a user-oriented design from scratch, the buildings having different functions before, and the fact that these converted buildings cannot fully meet the requirements of the user.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The surplus of “converted special education buildings” in our country and this building group being suitable for the requirements of special education students, and all their requirements are planned from the ground up, and what can be done to make the existing converted buildings affordable with the least cost, designing an accessible and barrier-free special education building were the focal points of the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Accessibility · Universal Design · Disabled Individuals

Abstract

In special education and rehabilitation buildings, where physically and mentally disabled individuals receive education and develop some social skills to integrate themselves into social life, many problems are faced depending on the design. The reasons for this are the inadequacy of architectural solutions, the lack of a user-oriented design from scratch, the buildings having different functions before, and the fact that these converted buildings cannot fully meet the requirements of the user. The surplus of “converted special education buildings” in our country and this building group being suitable for the requirements of special education students, and all their requirements are planned from the ground up, and what can be done to make the existing converted buildings affordable with the least cost, designing an accessible and barrier-free special education building were the focal points of the study.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAŞ, M. D., GÜNGÖR, C., SAHİL, S. (2023). SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS AND ACCESSIBILITY. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 253–268. https://ajindex.com/articles/952116

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182
  2. Giresunlu,G.,Engellinin El Kitabı, Destek Yayınları,2011,İstanbul. True, E.,Türel, H., YAPILI BİR ÇEVRENİN FİZİKSEL ENGELLİLER YÖNÜYLE KULLANILABİLİRLİĞİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA,Yalın Yayıncılık, 2019, İstanbul
  3. Öztürk, M. (2011). Türkiye”de Engelli Gerçeği. MÜSİAD Cep Kitapları-30, İstanbul: Ajansvista, 1-22
  4. Yılmaz,B.,“Bedensel Engelli Çocukların Temel Eğitim Okullarında Eğitim Alabilmesi İçin Gereken Mimari Düzenlemeler”, Bilimsel Dergi Makalesi,( 2005
  5. Çağlar,S., Uluslararası Hukuk ve Türk Sisteminde Engellilerin Eğitim Hakkı ve Devlet Yükümlülükleri,Beta Basım, 2009,İstanbul
  6. Güngör, C.,“Alışveriş Merkezlerinin Engelliler İçinErişebilirlik Standartları Kapsamında İrdelenmesi”, Doktora Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, (2007
  7. Ertürk, K.L., Şimşek, A., Songür, D.G., Şengül, G., “Türkiye”de Engelli Farkındalığı ve Engelli Bireylerin Adalete Web Erişilebilirlikleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2014, 15 (2) 375-395 [8] Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, (2013). Mesleki eğitimde bütünleştirme uygulamaları kılavuzu, Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri, 12-172 [9] Dişyapar, C.,“LİSE YAPILARININ ve YAKIN ÇEVRELERİNİN ULAŞILABİLİRLİKLE İLGİLİ TÜRK STANDARTLARI BAĞLAMINDA İNCELENMESİ”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı, (2015
  8. Karagöz,T.,”ÇANKIRI DEVLET HASTANESİ YERLEŞKESİ VE ÇEVRESİNİN ULAŞILABİLİRLİK İLE İLGİLİ TÜRK STANDARTLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE İNCELENMESİ”,Yüksek Lisans Tezi,Gazi Üniversitesi,Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı,(2019
  9. Özel Eğitim Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararname, Sayı 573, Madde 3. T.C. Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı, 1999, s.395
  10. Kaplan, G., Aksoy, V., “Özel Eğitim Kurumlarının Fiziksel Koşullarının Evrensel Tasarım İlkeleri Doğrultusunda İncelenmesi”: Eskişehir Örneği, Yaşadıkça Eğitim, Cilt 33, Sayı 2, Yıl 2019, s. 169-186 [13] Mace, R.L., G.J. Hardie ve J.P. Place, (1997), AccessibleEnvironments: Toward Universal Design, (çev. Hacıhasanoğlu) NC StateUniversity, The Center for Universal Design. (Eserin orijinali 1991”de yayımlandı.), 93-101
  11. Belir,Ö.,Çakır,H.,Evrensel Tasarıma Farklı Bakışlar, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık,2018,Ankara
  12. Aslaksen,F., Bergh, S., Bringa, O.R.,& Heggem,E.K.(1997,Aralık).Universal Design: Planning and Design for All.Cornell University ILR School
  13. Ersöz, E., En