Journals / Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2

AN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS BASED INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION INDEX MODEL PROPOSAL FOR MUNICIPALITIES IN TURKEY

TÜRKİYE’DEKİ BELEDİYELER İÇİN AHP TABANLI ENTEGRE PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRME ENDEKS MODELİ ÖNERİSİ

Pages
361–398
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An index model proposal and a performance measurement evolved based upon the opinions of 12 experts utilizing the “analytical hierarchy process” technique of “multi-criteria decision making” methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Municipalities across Turkey are expected to adopt the principles of transparency, accountability, sound financial management and open ethical public engagement practices that include the provision and use of communication tools to facilitate an effective and clear voice within, and on behalf of the community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, annual reports published by 29 Metropolitan Municipalities in Turkey between 2018 and 2020 were examined for the purpose of digitizing social data using content analysis methodology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An index model proposal and a performance measurement evolved based upon the opinions of 12 experts utilizing the “analytical hierarchy process” technique of “multi-criteria decision making” methods.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Entegre Raporlama Endeksi · Entegre Performans · AHP

Abstract

Municipalities across Turkey are expected to adopt the principles of transparency, accountability, sound financial management and open ethical public engagement practices that include the provision and use of communication tools to facilitate an effective and clear voice within, and on behalf of the community. In this study, annual reports published by 29 Metropolitan Municipalities in Turkey between 2018 and 2020 were examined for the purpose of digitizing social data using content analysis methodology. An index model proposal and a performance measurement evolved based upon the opinions of 12 experts utilizing the “analytical hierarchy process” technique of “multi-criteria decision making” methods.

Özet

Paydaşlarıyla en yakın teması kuran kamu kurumu statüsündeki belediyelerin şeffaf ve hesap verebilir olması beklenmektedir. Kurumsal raporlar, yerel yönetimler ve paydaşları arasındaki iletişimi sağlamada önemli araçlardır. Bu makalenin amacı ülkemizdeki belediyeler tarafından uygulanabilir bir “Entegre Raporlama Endeks Modeli” önerisinde bulunmak ve “Entegre Performans Ölçümlerini” yapmaktır. 29 Büyükşehir Belediyesi’nin 2018-2020 yılları arasında yayınladıkları faaliyet ve finansal raporlar incelenmiş, elde edilen sosyal veriler “içerik analizi” yöntemi ile sayısallaştırılmış, finansal veriler normalize edilmiş ve 12 uzmandan alınan görüşlerle “çok kriterli karar verme” yöntemlerinden “analitik hiyerarşi süreci” tekniği kullanılarak model önerisi oluşturulmuştur. Sayısallaştırılmış sosyal verilerle normalize edilmiş finansal veriler analiz edilerek performans ölçümleri yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBAŞ, M. Ç., KAYA, C. (2023). AN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS BASED INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION INDEX MODEL PROPOSAL FOR MUNICIPALITIES IN TURKEY. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 361–398. https://ajindex.com/articles/950328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Akbaş, M. Ç.(2022). A Research on Local Governments’ V[ew on Integrated Report[ng [n Turkey anda Model Proposal, (Yayın No.766438) [Doktora Tez[, Yed[tepe Ün[vers[tes[ Sosyal B[l[mler Enst[tüsü]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkez[. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkez[/tezSorguSonucYen[.jsp Al Khal[l, M. I. (2002). Selecting the Appropriate Project Delivery Method Using AHP. International Journal of Project Management, 20(6), 469-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00032-1
  2. Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., & Williams, T. A. (2008). Quantitative Methods for Business (Vol. 11th edition). South-Western Cengage Learning. Aras, G., & Yıldırım, F. M. (2022). Development of Capitals in Integrated Reporting and Weighting Representative Indicators with Entropy Approach. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(2), 551-572. DOI: http://do[.org/10.1108/srj-11-2020-0447
  3. Barron, F. H., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights. Management Science, 42(11), 1515-1523. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634518.
  4. Birney, A., Clarkson, H., Madden, P., Porritt, J., & Tuxworth, B. (2010). Stepping Up: A Framework for Public Sector Leadership on Sustainability. London: Forum for the Future. Black Sun Plc. (2012). Understanding Transformation-Building the Business Case for Integrated Reporting. IIRC. Caruana, J., & Grech, I. (2019, May 28). Tweaking Public Sector Reporting With Integrated Reporting Concepts. Public Money&Management, 39(6), 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1583911
  5. Farneti, F., Casonato, F., Montecalvo, M., & De Villiers, C. (2019). The Influence of Integrated Reporting and Stakeholder Information Needs on the Disclosure of Social Information in a State- Owned Enterprise. Meditari Accountancy Research, 4(27), 556-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2019-0436
  6. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). A Friedman doctrine--The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. Retrieved from NY Times: https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a- friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html Girella, L. (2021). Integrated Reporting And Corporate Governance. London and New York: Routledge. Global Reporting Initiative. (2005). Sector Supplement for Public Sector Agencies: Pilot Version 1.0. GRI. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative. Global Reporting Initiative. (2022, 06 21). GRI STANDARDS. Retrieved from A Short Introduction to the GRI Standards: https://www.globalreporting.org/media/wtaf14tw/a-short-