SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2019 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

Comparison Performances of PSO and GA to Tuning PID Controller for the DC Motor

Harun YAZGAN
Furkan YENER
Semih SOYSAL
Ahmet GÜR
Pages
162–174
Publication Date
2019-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The PSO algorithm produces better results than Genetic Algorithm for each criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A DC motor widely uses for sensitive speed and position in industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Stability and productivity of a system are important for controlling of a DC motor speed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The PSO algorithm produces better results than Genetic Algorithm for each criteria.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:DC motor · PID · PSO

Abstract

A DC motor widely uses for sensitive speed and position in industry. Stability and productivity of a system are important for controlling of a DC motor speed. Stable of speed which affected from load fluctuation and environmental factors. Therefore, it is important for the speed value which is required as constant and to keep it as its value. In this study, it is aimed that the speed value which is achieved as required value and keeping it as constant using Proportional, Integral and Derivative (PID) controller for tuning parameters. Firstly, Ziegler-Nichols (ZN) is one of a traditional method used. PID parameters are determined with responses of open-loop under running system. Later, parameters of the PID are estimated using two metaheuristic algorithms such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA). As a result, three algorithms’ results are compared based on five criteria. The PSO algorithm produces better results than Genetic Algorithm for each criteria.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZGAN, H., YENER, F., SOYSAL, S., GÜR, A. (2019). Comparison Performances of PSO and GA to Tuning PID Controller for the DC Motor. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 162–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/942048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. R. G. Kanojiya and P. M. Meshram, “Optimal tuning of PI controller for speed control of DC motor drive using particle swarm optimization,” in Advances in Power Conversion and Energy Technologies (APCET), 2012 International Conference on, 2012, pp. 1–6. N. Thomas and D. P. Poongodi, “Position control of DC motor using genetic algorithm based PID controller,” in Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 2009, vol. 2, pp. 1–3. J. C. Basilio and S. R. Matos, “Design of PI and PID controllers with transient performance specification,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 364–370, 2002.
  2. S. G. Kumar, R. Jain, N. Anantharaman, V. Dharmalingam, and K. Begum, “Genetic algorithm based PID controller tuning for a model bioreactor,” Indian Chem. Eng., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 214–226, 2008.
  3. M. K. Tan, Y. K. Chin, H. J. Tham, and K. T. K. Teo, “Genetic algorithm based PID optimization in batch process control,” in Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ICCAIE), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, 2011, pp. 162–167.
  4. A. D. Lidbe, A. M. Hainen, and S. L. Jones, “Comparative study of simulated annealing, tabu search, and the genetic algorithm for calibration of the microsimulation model,” Simulation, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 21–33, 2017. Z.-L. Gaing, “A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 384–391, 2004.
  5. B. Allaoua, B. Gasbaoui, and B. Mebarki, “Setting up PID DC motor speed control alteration parameters using particle swarm optimization strategy,” Leonardo Electron. J. Pract. Technol., vol. 14, pp. 19–32, 2009. R. Dong, “Differential evolution versus particle swarm optimization for PID controller design,” in 2009 Fifth International Conference on Natural Computation, 2009, vol. 3, pp. 236–240.
  6. Y.-T. Hsiao, C.-L. Chuang, and C.-C. Chien, “Ant colony optimization for designing of PID controllers,” in Computer Aided Control Systems Design, 2004 IEEE International Symposium on, 2004, pp. 321–326.
  7. I. Chiha, N. Liouane, and P. Borne, “Tuning PID controller using multiobjective ant colony optimization,” Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput., vol. 2012, p. 11, 2012. X. Dong and others, “The PID Controller Based on the Artificial Neural Network and the Differential Evolution Algorithm,” 2012. V. Rajinikanth and K. Latha, “I-PD controller tuning for unstable system using bacterial foraging algorithm: a study based on various error criterion,” Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Co