SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 30 Issue: 4

Integrated Optimization of Robotic Disassembly Lines and Vehicle Routing for E-Waste Component Distribution

Ömer Nedim Kenger(Gaziantep University)0000-0001-7119-9262
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show the strong relationship between disassembly planning and distribution decisions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study presents the Robotic Disassembly Line Balancing and Vehicle Routing Problem (R-DLVRP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is an integrated optimization model for recovering end-of-life (EoL) products.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show the strong relationship between disassembly planning and distribution decisions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Robotic disassembly line balancing · Vehicle routing · E-Waste recycling

Abstract

This study presents the Robotic Disassembly Line Balancing and Vehicle Routing Problem (R-DLVRP). It is an integrated optimization model for recovering end-of-life (EoL) products. The model combines robotic disassembly planning with the distribution of recovered components. In this problem, EoL products are disassembled by robots on a disassembly line. Tasks are assigned to stations, and appropriate robots are allocated to each task. The recovered components are then distributed to demand points using a vehicle routing plan. A mixed-integer programming model is developed for the problem and solved using the Gurobi Optimizer. The objective is to minimize the total system cost, including robot-related costs, station opening costs, and transportation costs. A computational study is conducted to analyze the behavior of the integrated model under varying operational parameters such as robot cost structures, working time, and demand levels. The results show the strong relationship between disassembly planning and distribution decisions. In addition, differences in costs between resources influence the overall system configuration. The proposed framework contributes to the literature by providing a unified modeling approach for robotic disassembly and distribution planning.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kenger, Ö. N. (2026). Integrated Optimization of Robotic Disassembly Lines and Vehicle Routing for E-Waste Component Distribution. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Volume: 30 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1888741

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. A. Güngör and S. M. Gupta, “A solution approach to the disassembly line balancing problem in the presence of task failures,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1427–1467, 2001, doi: 10.1080/00207540110052157.
  2. A. Koç, İ. Sabuncuoğlu, and E. Erel, “Two exact formulations for disassembly line balancing problems with task precedence diagram construction using an AND/OR graph,” IIE Trans., vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 866–881, 2009, doi: 10.1080/07408170802510390.
  3. Z. A. Çil, S. Mete, and F. Serin, “Robotic disassembly line balancing problem: A mathematical model and ant colony optimization approach,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 86, pp. 335–348, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.05.006.
  4. S. Laser and A. F. Stowell, “Thinking like Apple’s recycling robots: Towards the activation of responsibility in a postenvironmentalist world,” Ephemera: Theory Politics Organ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 163–194, 2020.
  5. R. Bogue, “Robots in recycling and disassembly,” Ind. Robot, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 461–466, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1108/IR-03-2019-0053.
  6. Z. Diri Kenger, Ç. Koç, and E. Özceylan, “Integrated disassembly line balancing and routing problem with mobile additive manufacturing,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 235, Art. no. 108088, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108088.
  7. Z. Diri Kenger, Ç. Koç, and E. Özceylan, “Integrated disassembly line balancing and routing problem,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 58, no. 23, pp. 7250–7268, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1740346.
  8. Z. A. Çil, H. Öztop, Z. Diri Kenger, and D. Kızılay, “Integrating distributed disassembly line balancing and vehicle routing problem in supply chain: Integer programming, constraint programming, and heuristic algorithms,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 265, Art. no. 109014, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109014.
  9. Z. Diri Kenger, Ç. Koç, and E. Özceylan, “Smart factories: Integrated disassembly line balancing and routing problem with 3D printers,” in Logistics 4.0: Digital Transformation of Supply Chain Management, T. Paksoy, Ç. Koçhan, and S. S. Ali, Eds. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2020, pp. 166–177, doi: 10.1201/9780429327636-20.
  10. Z. Diri Kenger, Ç. Koç, and E. Özceylan, “Integrated collection-disassembly-distribution problem,” in Sustainable Production and Logistics: Modeling and Analysis, E. Özceylan and S. M. Gupta, Eds. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2021, pp. 87–101, doi: 10.1201/9781003005018-5-6.
  11. N. Durmaz and A. Budak, “An integrated bi-objective green vehicle routing and partial disassembly line problem for electronic waste: An industrial case study,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 408–433, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2024.2335984.
  12. Z. A. Çil, D. Kızılay, and H. Öztop, “Mathematical models for disassembly line balancing and pickup-delivery vehicle routing problem,” J. Transp. Logist., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 180–190, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.26650/JTL.2023.1338878.
  13. J. Liu et al., “An improved multi-objective discrete bees algorithm for robotic disassembly line balancing problem in remanufacturing,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 97, pp. 3937–3962, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00170-018-2183-7.
  14. B. Zhou and J. Bian, “Multi-mechanism-based modified bi-objective Harris Hawks optimization for sustainable robotic disassembly line balancing problems,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 116, Art. no. 105479, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105479.
  15. Y. Fang, Q. Liu, M. Li, Y. Laili, and D. T. Pham, “Evolutionary many-objective optimization for mixed-model disassembly line balancing with multi-robotic workstations,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 160–174, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.035.
  16. Y. Fang, H. Ming, M. Li, Q. Liu, and D. T. Pham, “Multi-objective evolutionary simulated annealing optimisation for mixed-model multi-robotic disassembly line balancing with interval processing time,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 846–862, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1602290.
  17. J. Guo, S. He, B. Du, X. Sun, and K. Wang, “A multi-population cooperative coevolution artificial bee colony algorithm for partial multi-robotic disassembly line balancing problem considering preventive maintenance scenarios,” Adv. Eng. Inform., vol. 62, Art. no. 102750, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2024.102750.
  18. T. Yin, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, T. Wu, and W. Liang, “Mixed-integer programming model and hybrid driving algorithm for multi-product partial disassembly line balancing problem with multi-robot workstations,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 73, Art. no. 102251, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102251.
  19. Z. Zhang et al., “Industrial application of multi-robot destructive disassembly line balancing under component non-disassemblability for multi-product scenarios,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 63, no. 18, pp. 6801–6826, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2025.2487923.
  20. T. Wu, Z. Zhang, Y. Zeng, Y. Zhang, L. Guo, and J. Liu, “Techno-economic and environmental benefits-oriented human–robot collaborative disassembly line balancing optimization in remanufacturing,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 86, Art. no. 102650, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102650.
  21. T. Wu, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zeng, “Modelling and optimisation of two-sided disassembly line balancing problem with human–robot interaction constraints,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 230, Art. no. 120589, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120589.
  22. W. Xu, J. Cui, B. Liu, J. Liu, B. Yao, and Z. Zhou, “Human–robot collaborative disassembly line balancing considering the safe strategy in remanufacturing,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 324, Art. no. 129158, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129158.
  23. G. Yuan et al., “Integrated optimisation of human–robot collaborative disassembly planning and adaptive evaluation driven by a digital twin,” Int. J. Prod. Res., pp. 1–19, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2381710.
  24. K. Wang, Y. Li, J. Guo, L. Gao, and X. Li, “Dynamic balancing of U-shaped robotic disassembly lines using an effective deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 6855–6865, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TII.2023.3348811.
  25. T. Wu, Z. Zhang, T. Yin, and Y. Zhang, “Multi-objective optimisation for cell-level disassembly of waste power battery modules in human–machine hybrid mode,” Waste Manag., vol. 144, pp. 513–526, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.04.015. L. Guo, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and H. Song, “Exploring engineering applications of two-sided partial destructive disassembly line balancing problem under electrical limiting and time-of-use pricing,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 262, Art. no. 125573, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125573.
  26. W. Zhang, Y. Li, K. Wang, W. Xu, and L. Gao, “A green and efficient disassembly line balancing with human–robot collaboration and destructive disassembly,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 97, Art. no. 103081, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2025.103081.
  27. X. Zhang, Q. Zhao, G. Tian, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, Z. M. Yaseen, and D. T. Pham, “Multi-objective heterogeneous interactive human–robot collaborative disassembly line balancing with partial destructive mode in type-2 fuzzy environment,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 48, Art. no. 100963, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2025.100963.
  28. P. Augerat, J. M. Belenguer, E. Benavent, A. Corberán, D. Naddef, and G. Rinaldi, “Computational results with a branch-and-cut code for the capacitated vehicle routing problem,” Res. Rep. 949-M, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France, 1995.