SavedAdd your journal

Journals / 4. BOYUT Medya ve Kültürel Çalışmalar Dergisi / 2022 / Sayı: 22

The Fourth Industrial Revolution: A New Ideology

Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi: Yeni Bir İdeoloji

Esra TUNÇAY
Çevirmen: Esra TUNÇAY
Pages
127–147
Publication Date
2023-05-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article argues the framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to bolster the contingent neoliberalism of the post-Washington consensus period, and therefore it serves to obscure the continuing decline of the globalized world order with the narrative of a brave new world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The hegemonic construal of the Fourth Industrial Revolution portrays the rapid technological developments as a bold, new Industrial Revolution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to the sparse evidence of any such revolution across the totality of social, political, cultural, and economic institutions locally and globally, the focus must turn to how this ideological framework functions to further the interests of social and economic elites worldwide.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article argues the framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to bolster the contingent neoliberalism of the post-Washington consensus period, and therefore it serves to obscure the continuing decline of the globalized world order with the narrative of a brave new world.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hegemonya · ideoloji · Sanayi Devrimi

Abstract

The hegemonic construal of the Fourth Industrial Revolution portrays the rapid technological developments as a bold, new Industrial Revolution. Due to the sparse evidence of any such revolution across the totality of social, political, cultural, and economic institutions locally and globally, the focus must turn to how this ideological framework functions to further the interests of social and economic elites worldwide. This article examines how Klaus Schwab, as the principal intellectual of the World Economic Forum and the interests it represents, has formulated and disseminated this ideology. The article argues the framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to bolster the contingent neoliberalism of the post-Washington consensus period, and therefore it serves to obscure the continuing decline of the globalized world order with the narrative of a brave new world.

Özet

“Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi’nin hegemonik yorumu, hızlı teknolojik gelişmeleri cesur, yeni bir sanayi devrimi olarak resmediyor. Yerel ve küresel olarak sosyal, politik, kültürel ve ekonomik kurumların bütününde böyle bir devrime dair çok az kanıt olduğundan, odak noktası bu ideolojik çerçevenin dünya çapındaki sosyal ve ekonomik seçkinlerin çıkarlarını ilerletmek için nasıl işlediğine çevrilmelidir. Bu makale, Dünya Ekonomik Forumu’nun ve temsil ettiği çıkarların başlıca entelektüeli olarak Klaus Schwab’ın bu ideolojiyi nasıl formüle ettiğini ve yaydığını incelemektedir. Makale, “Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi” çerçevesinin, Washington sonrası mutabakat döneminin olumsal neoliberalizmini desteklediğini ve bu nedenle, “cesur yeni bir dünya” anlatısıyla küreselleşen dünya düzeninin süregelen düşüşünü karartmaya hizmet ettiğini savunuyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNÇAY, E., TUNÇAY, Ç. E. (2023). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: A New Ideology. 4. BOYUT Medya ve Kültürel Çalışmalar Dergisi, Sayı: 22, 127–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/941454

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aalbers, M. (2013). “Neoliberalism is dead. long live neoliberalism!”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (3): 1083-1090. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12065 google scholar Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press. google scholar Althusser, L. (1969). For Marx. New York: Pantheon. google scholar Arrighi, G. (1994). The Long Twentieth Century. London: Verso. google scholar Barrett, P., and Dorothée Baumann-P. (2019). Made in Ethiopia: Challenges in the Garment Industry’s New Frontier [report]. New York University: Stern Centre for Business and Human Rights. (2022). Human Rights, https://humanrights.wbcsd.org/project/madein-ethiopia-challenges-in-the-garment-industrys-new-frontier/ Accessed February 1, 2022. google scholar Beckert, S. (2014). Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. google scholar Benyera, E. (2021). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Recolonisation of Africa: The Coloniality of Data. London: Routledge. google scholar Bilic, P. (2018). “A critique of the political economy of algorithms: a brief history of google’s technological rationality”. triple C: Communication, Capitalism and Critique 16(1): 315-331. doi:10.31269/vol16iss1pp315-331 google scholar Bythell, D. (1983). Cottage Industry and the Factory System. History Today 33 (4): 1723. google scholar Carnoy, M. and Manuel Castells. 2001. Globalization, the Knowledge Society, and the Network State: Poulantzas at the Millennium. Global Networks 1 (1): 1-18. doi:10.1111/1471-0374.00002 google scholar Castells, M. (2018). Rupture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press. google scholar Castells, M. (2004). Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. London: Edward Elgar. google scholar Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. google scholar Castells, M. (1999). “Information technology, globalization and social development”. Discussion Paper No. 114. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. google scholar Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit Over People: Neoliberalism and the World Order. New York: Seven Stories. google scholar Davies, W. (2016). The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. London: Sage. google scholar Dattel, E. (2009). Cotton and Race in America (1787-1930): The Human Price of Economic Growth. Chicago: Ivan Dee. google scholar Delanty, G. and Neal H. (2021). “Critical th