Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Irrigation Experiments with GGE Biplot Method and Economic Analysis of Drip Irrigation System: A Case Study of Peanut Production

Pages
464–477
Publication Date
2023-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a results of the study, a 2-day irrigation interval and 75% of pan evaporation could be used in the irrigation of peanut plants grown under sandy soil conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Besides irrigation water (IW) quantity and quality, there is a decrease also in soil quality and fertility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drip irrigation is primarily practiced attain get greater yields per unit area.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a results of the study, a 2-day irrigation interval and 75% of pan evaporation could be used in the irrigation of peanut plants grown under sandy soil conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Evapotranspiration · WUE · EWP

Abstract

Besides irrigation water (IW) quantity and quality, there is a decrease also in soil quality and fertility. Agricultural production lands are decreasing both in quantity and quality. There is a search for different operational alternatives in sandy soils with low production potentials. Drip irrigation is primarily practiced attain get greater yields per unit area. This study was conducted under sand soil conditions, commonly preferred for peanut farming, in the 2017-2018 growing seasons. A drip irrigation system was used in production. Halisbey, NC-7, and Sultan cultivars were used as plant materials. Two different irrigation intervals (2 and 4 days) and four different irrigation levels (I50, I75, I100 and I125, calculated based on cumulative evaporation from the class-A pan) were applied. The data of five vegetative traits, including grain yield, were evaluated by regression and GGE biplot analysis. In addition, applied IW quantity, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency (WUE) were assessed by econometric analysis. Evapotranspiration values varied between 402-832 mm, applied IW quantities between 313-783 mm, yields between 5,269-8,269 kg ha-1, WUE values between 0.63-1.55 kg ha-1 m-3, economic water productivity over gross revenues between 1.29-3.81 $ m-3 and benefit and cost ratios varied between 4.73-10.95. The GGE biplot statistical method is a useful tool in the evaluation of irrigation research where the number of applications and materials is high. As a results of the study, a 2-day irrigation interval and 75% of pan evaporation could be used in the irrigation of peanut plants grown under sandy soil conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAS, İ. (2023). Evaluation of Irrigation Experiments with GGE Biplot Method and Economic Analysis of Drip Irrigation System: A Case Study of Peanut Production. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2, 464–477. https://ajindex.com/articles/932874

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akçura S (2021). Investigation of Salt Tolerant Genotypes in Edible Cluster Bean. KSU J. Agric Nat 24(1): 99-107. doi.org/0.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.727318 Akçura M, Turan V, Kokten K & Kaplan M (2019). Fatty acid and some micro element compositions of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) genotype seeds growing under Mediterranean climate. Industrial Crops and Products 128: 140-146. doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.062 https://www.peanutsusa.com/about-apc/the-peanut-industry.html https://www.statista.com/statistics/679337/asia-pacific-groundnut-production-by-country
  2. Arya S S, Salve A R & Chauhan S (2016). Peanuts as functional food: a review. J Food Sci Technol 53(1): 31-41. doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2007-9
  3. Aydinsakir K, Dinc N, Buyuktas D, Bastug R & Toker R (2016). Assessment of different irrigation levels on peanut crop yield and quality components under Mediterranean conditions. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 142(9):04016034. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001062 Bandyopadhyay P K, Mallick S & Rana S K (2005). Water balance and crop coefficients of summer-grown peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a humid tropical region of India. Irrigation Science 23:161-169. doi.org/10.1007/s00271-005-0104-7
  4. Bessembinder J J E, Leffelaar P A, Dhindwal A S & Ponsioen T C (2005). Which crop and which drop, and the scope for improvement of water productivity. Agricultural Water Management 73(2): 113-130. doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.10.004 Canavar O & Kaynak M A (2013). Determination of yield and yield components and seed quality of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea l.) at different harvest times. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4: 3791-3803.
  5. Choudhary A, Singh A K, Kumar R, Kaswan P K, Singh R, Godara A S, Kaledhonkar M J & Meena B L (2020). Performance of different varieties of groundnut under surface and subsurface drip irrigation using saline and good quality waters. Journal of Soil Salinity and Water Quality 12(1): 65-69.
  6. El- Boraie F M, Abo-El-Ela H K & Gaber A M (2009). Water requirements of peanut grown in sandy soil under drip irrigation and biofertilization. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3(1): 55-65.
  7. El-Metwally I M, Abido W A E, Saadoon S M & Gad S B (2020). The integrated effect of deficit irrigation and weed control treatments on peanut productivity under sandy soil conditions with reference to nematode infection. Plant Archives 20(1): 2581-2593.
  8. Enciso J M, Colaizzi P D & Multer W L (2005). Economic analy