Dergiler / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Irrigation Experiments with GGE Biplot Method and Economic Analysis of Drip Irrigation System: A Case Study of Peanut Production

Sayfa
464–477
Yayın Tarihi
2023-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a results of the study, a 2-day irrigation interval and 75% of pan evaporation could be used in the irrigation of peanut plants grown under sandy soil conditions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Besides irrigation water (IW) quantity and quality, there is a decrease also in soil quality and fertility.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Drip irrigation is primarily practiced attain get greater yields per unit area.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a results of the study, a 2-day irrigation interval and 75% of pan evaporation could be used in the irrigation of peanut plants grown under sandy soil conditions.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Evapotranspiration · WUE · EWP

Abstract

Besides irrigation water (IW) quantity and quality, there is a decrease also in soil quality and fertility. Agricultural production lands are decreasing both in quantity and quality. There is a search for different operational alternatives in sandy soils with low production potentials. Drip irrigation is primarily practiced attain get greater yields per unit area. This study was conducted under sand soil conditions, commonly preferred for peanut farming, in the 2017-2018 growing seasons. A drip irrigation system was used in production. Halisbey, NC-7, and Sultan cultivars were used as plant materials. Two different irrigation intervals (2 and 4 days) and four different irrigation levels (I50, I75, I100 and I125, calculated based on cumulative evaporation from the class-A pan) were applied. The data of five vegetative traits, including grain yield, were evaluated by regression and GGE biplot analysis. In addition, applied IW quantity, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency (WUE) were assessed by econometric analysis. Evapotranspiration values varied between 402-832 mm, applied IW quantities between 313-783 mm, yields between 5,269-8,269 kg ha-1, WUE values between 0.63-1.55 kg ha-1 m-3, economic water productivity over gross revenues between 1.29-3.81 $ m-3 and benefit and cost ratios varied between 4.73-10.95. The GGE biplot statistical method is a useful tool in the evaluation of irrigation research where the number of applications and materials is high. As a results of the study, a 2-day irrigation interval and 75% of pan evaporation could be used in the irrigation of peanut plants grown under sandy soil conditions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAS, İ. (2023). Evaluation of Irrigation Experiments with GGE Biplot Method and Economic Analysis of Drip Irrigation System: A Case Study of Peanut Production. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2, 464–477. https://ajindex.com/articles/932874

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Akçura S (2021). Investigation of Salt Tolerant Genotypes in Edible Cluster Bean. KSU J. Agric Nat 24(1): 99-107. doi.org/0.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.727318 Akçura M, Turan V, Kokten K & Kaplan M (2019). Fatty acid and some micro element compositions of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) genotype seeds growing under Mediterranean climate. Industrial Crops and Products 128: 140-146. doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.062 https://www.peanutsusa.com/about-apc/the-peanut-industry.html https://www.statista.com/statistics/679337/asia-pacific-groundnut-production-by-country
  2. Arya S S, Salve A R & Chauhan S (2016). Peanuts as functional food: a review. J Food Sci Technol 53(1): 31-41. doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2007-9
  3. Aydinsakir K, Dinc N, Buyuktas D, Bastug R & Toker R (2016). Assessment of different irrigation levels on peanut crop yield and quality components under Mediterranean conditions. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 142(9):04016034. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001062 Bandyopadhyay P K, Mallick S & Rana S K (2005). Water balance and crop coefficients of summer-grown peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a humid tropical region of India. Irrigation Science 23:161-169. doi.org/10.1007/s00271-005-0104-7
  4. Bessembinder J J E, Leffelaar P A, Dhindwal A S & Ponsioen T C (2005). Which crop and which drop, and the scope for improvement of water productivity. Agricultural Water Management 73(2): 113-130. doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.10.004 Canavar O & Kaynak M A (2013). Determination of yield and yield components and seed quality of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea l.) at different harvest times. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4: 3791-3803.
  5. Choudhary A, Singh A K, Kumar R, Kaswan P K, Singh R, Godara A S, Kaledhonkar M J & Meena B L (2020). Performance of different varieties of groundnut under surface and subsurface drip irrigation using saline and good quality waters. Journal of Soil Salinity and Water Quality 12(1): 65-69.
  6. El- Boraie F M, Abo-El-Ela H K & Gaber A M (2009). Water requirements of peanut grown in sandy soil under drip irrigation and biofertilization. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3(1): 55-65.
  7. El-Metwally I M, Abido W A E, Saadoon S M & Gad S B (2020). The integrated effect of deficit irrigation and weed control treatments on peanut productivity under sandy soil conditions with reference to nematode infection. Plant Archives 20(1): 2581-2593.
  8. Enciso J M, Colaizzi P D & Multer W L (2005). Economic analy