Journals / Veterinary Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University / 2017 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

A Study of Some Biological, Anatomical and Related Environmental Features of Nutria /Myocastor Coypus/ From The Territory of Stara Zagora Region

Pages
7–15
Publication Date
2017-09-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The difference between the volume of the nutria brain cavity and these of the jackal and fox is provoked by the differences in the type of their food and lifestyle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The nutria (Myocastor coypus) belongs to the class of Mammals, Rodents order, family Myocastoridae.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The peak of the face is blunted with clearly visible teeth, colored in bright orange.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The difference between the volume of the nutria brain cavity and these of the jackal and fox is provoked by the differences in the type of their food and lifestyle.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:nutria · biology · ecology

Abstract

The nutria (Myocastor coypus) belongs to the class of Mammals, Rodents order, family Myocastoridae. It leads a semiaquatic lifestyle and can be seen around rivers, lakes and marshes. Nutria is the biggest rodent in Bulgaria. It lives mainly along the rivers of southeastern Bulgaria. The animal’s body is cylindrical in shape, with relatively large head and short ears. The peak of the face is blunted with clearly visible teeth, colored in bright orange. Nutrias are mostly herbivores. Their role is to spread diseases such as equine encephalomyelitis, leptospirosis, hemorrhagic septicemia (Pasteurellosis), paratyphoid and salmonellosis. The aim of the study is to examine the impact of nutria on the environment on the territory of Stara Zagora region, and some of its biological and anatomical features. In some territories of Stara Zagora were found traces of life activity of nutria, as entrances of shelters, footprints of thoracic and pelvic limbs, and feces. Nutrias have not permanent habitats. In the study we found no evidence of damage on the environment. The study showed that the result of the vital activity of nutrias is rather positive, concerning the cleaning of the water areas of vegetation. We found that the thoracic and pelvic limbs have five fingers. The difference between the volume of the nutria brain cavity and these of the jackal and fox is provoked by the differences in the type of their food and lifestyle.

Özet

The nutria (Myocastor coypus) belongs to the class of Mammals, Rodents order, family Myocastoridae. It leads a semiaquatic lifestyle and can be seen around rivers, lakes and marshes. Nutria is the biggest rodent in Bulgaria. It lives mainly along the rivers of southeastern Bulgaria. The animal’s body is cylindrical in shape, with relatively large head and short ears. The peak of the face is blunted with clearly visible teeth, colored in bright orange. Nutrias are mostly herbivores. Their role is to spread diseases such as equine encephalomyelitis, leptospirosis, hemorrhagic septicemia (Pasteurellosis), paratyphoid and salmonellosis. The aim of the study is to examine the impact of nutria on the environment on the territory of Stara Zagora region, and some of its biological and anatomical features. In some territories of Stara Zagora were found traces of life activity of nutria, as entrances of shelters, footprints of thoracic and pelvic limbs, and feces. Nutrias have not permanent habitats. In the study we found no evidence of damage on the environment. The study showed that the result of the vital activity of nutrias is rather positive, concerning the cleaning of the water areas of vegetation. We found that the thoracic and pelvic limbs have five fingers. The difference between the volume of the nutria brain cavity and these of the jackal and fox is provoked by the differences in the type of their food and lifestyle.

🔖

Cite This Article

MİHAYLOV, R., DİMİTROV, R., BİNEV, R., STAMATOVA-YOVCHEVA, K. (2017). A Study of Some Biological, Anatomical and Related Environmental Features of Nutria /Myocastor Coypus/ From The Territory of Stara Zagora Region. Veterinary Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 7–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/931285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Aliev E. Numerical changes and the population structure of the coypu, Myocastor coypus (Molina, 1782), in different countries. Seaugetierkunkliche Mitteilungen. 1967; 15: 238- 242
  2. Carter J, Leonard P. A Review of the Literature on the Worldwide Distribution, Spread of, and Efforts to Eradicate the coypu (Myocastor coypus). Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2002; 30, (1): 162-175
  3. Bertolino S, Ingegno B. Modelling the distribution of an introduced species: The coypu (Myocastor coypus) (Mammalia, Rodentia) in Piedmont region, NW Italy- Italian Journal of Zoology. 2009; 76, (3): 340-346
  4. Invasive Species Specialist Group. 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species. 2000; www.issg.org 5. Mann G. Los pequenos mamifers de Chile. 40, p
  5. Editorial de la Universidad de Concepcion, Chile; 1978
  6. Peshev Tc, Peshev D, Popov V. Mammalia, C. Fauna Bulgarica, 27. p
  7. Sofia: Academic Publishing „Marin Drinov; 2004. (In Bulgarian language, with English summary)
  8. Popov V., Sedefchev A. 2003. The mammals in Bulgaria. Vitosha, Sofia. 290 p. (In Bulgarian)
  9. Mihajlov H, Stoyanov S. 2001. Hunting birds and mammals in Bulgaria. Pensoft. p. 208. (In Bulgarian)
  10. Gruychev G. New record of nutria (myocastor coypus, molina, 1782) downstream of the maritsa river in Bulgaria. Forestry ideas. 2012; 18, (1): 110–112
  11. Tzekova I. Investigation of the distribution and ecology of the nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Bulgaria. Bachelor degree, Faculty of Biology, Plovdiv University; 2016
  12. Hristov St. The beauty nutria, DUMA newspaper, 26/03/2011, No 70; 2011.
  13. The Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. Nutria Biology. Scientific classification; 2007. www.nutria.com/biology 13. Markov G. Mammals. p
  14. Sofia: Science and Art; 1988
  15. Hunter.bg. Nutria. 30.07.2009.
  16. Nestorova D. Nutrias, p. 150, 50th illustration. 2008.
  17. Gosling L. The coypu in East Anglia. Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists’ Society. 1974; 23: 49-59
  18. Evans J. About nutria and their control. United States Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife 1970; 86: 1-65
  19. Atwood EL. Life history studies of nutria, or coypu, in coastal Louisiana. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 1950; 14: 249-265
  20. Kilner NW, Linscombe G, Pamsey PR. Nutria. In: Novak M, Baker JA, Obbard ME, Malloch B, editors. Wild furbearer management and conservatio