SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ATATÜRK YOLU DERGİSİ / 2013 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 51

Atatürkçü düşünce sistemi: Atatürkçülük Kemalizm

Mehmet KAYIRAN
Mustafa Yahya METİNTAS
Pages
579–615
Publication Date
2013-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this investigation, Kemalism, which constitute the ideational basis of the “Turkish Revolution", was evaluated in a holistic approach based on the actions and statements of Mustafa Kemal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Kemalist Thought System: Kemalism Mustafa Kemal, the leader of the world wars of independence, has set up a new unitary Turkish state and pointed out the way and method of the modernization to the state.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This model, which has been implemented by the Turkish Revolution, is named as "Kemalism".
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this investigation, Kemalism, which constitute the ideational basis of the “Turkish Revolution", was evaluated in a holistic approach based on the actions and statements of Mustafa Kemal.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kemalizm · Atatürkçülük · Atatürk Yolu

Abstract

Kemalist Thought System: Kemalism Mustafa Kemal, the leader of the world wars of independence, has set up a new unitary Turkish state and pointed out the way and method of the modernization to the state. This model, which has been implemented by the Turkish Revolution, is named as "Kemalism". Kemalism, which is a guarantee of the Republic of Turkey to keep alive forever, is a consecutive multi-directional thought system that makes up a whole. Kemalism is not a "totalitarian - dogmatic" but is a "democratic and pragmatic" set of principles. Because the only idea left from- the spiritual heritage of- Ataturk to the Turkish nation is the “reason and science". The aim of our research is to emphasize that, as was in the past, "Kemalist Thought System", which has guided the "Turkish Revolution", is still an effective method that can be used to solve the problems that will be encountered currently and in the future. In this investigation, Kemalism, which constitute the ideational basis of the “Turkish Revolution", was evaluated in a holistic approach based on the actions and statements of Mustafa Kemal.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYIRAN, M., METİNTAS, M. Y. (2013). Atatürkçü düşünce sistemi: Atatürkçülük Kemalizm. ATATÜRK YOLU DERGİSİ, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 51, 579–615. https://ajindex.com/articles/924668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Akgün, Seçil, Halifeliğin Kaldırılması ve Laiklik (1924-1928), Đstanbul 2006.
  2. Alp, Tekin, Kemalizm, Đstanbul, 1936.
  3. Ana Britannica, Cilt: 6. Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi, Avrupa Tarihi, (Editör: Mehmet Kayıran), Eskişehir, 1991.
  4. Atatürk, Mustafa Kemal, Nutuk (Söylev), C. I - II, Ankara, 1986. Atatürk’ün Söylev ve Demeçleri (1906 – 1938),
  5. C. II, Ankara, 1959. Atatürk’ün Söylev ve Demeçleri (1918-1937),
  6. C. III, Ankara, 1954. Atatürk’ün Söylev ve Demeçleri (1919-1937),
  7. C. I, Ankara, 1961. Atatürk’ün Söylev ve Demeçleri, C. V, Ankara, 1972.
  8. Ateş, Toktamış, Cumhuriyet, Ankara, 1986.
  9. Aydemir, Şevket Süreyya, Đkinci Adam, C.I, Đstanbul, 1984.
  10. Aydemir, Şevket Süreyya, Đnkılâp ve Kadro, Đstanbul, 1986.
  11. Aysan, Mustafa, Atatürk’ün Ekonomi Politikası, Kırklareli, 1981.
  12. Başar, Ahmet Hamdi, Atatürk’le Üç Ay ve 1930’dan Sonra Türkiye, Ankara, 1981.
  13. Başgil, Ali Fuat, Din ve Layiklik, Đstanbul, 1962.
  14. Berkes, Niyazi, ‘‘Yüz Yıl Đçinde Atatürk’’, Atatürk ve Devrimler, Đstanbul, 1982.
  15. Berkes, Niyazi, “Atatürk ve Laikliğin Đki Kaynağı”, Atatürk ve Devrimler, Đstanbul, 198 Borak, Sadi, Atatürk’ün Resmi Yayınlara Girmemiş Söylev, Demeç, Yazışma ve Söyleşileri, Ankara 1980. C.H.P. Dördüncü Büyük Kurultay Görüşmeleri Tutulgası (9-16 Mayıs 1935), Ankara, 1935.
  16. Cumhuriyet Halk Fırkası Programı, Ankara, 1931.
  17. Çeçen, Anıl, Atatürk ve Cumhuriyet, Ankara, 1981.
  18. Demir, Ömer – Acar, Mustafa, Sosyal Bilimler Sözlüğü, Ankara, 1997.
  19. Develioğlu, Ferit, Osmanlıca – Türkçe Ansiklopedik Lügat, Ankara, 1993.
  20. Dumoulin, Daniel, Atatürk’ten Düşünceler, Ankara, 2000.
  21. Eroğlu, Hamza, Atatürk ve Milli Egemenlik, Ankara, 1998.
  22. Eroğlu, Hamza, Atatürk ve Milliyetçilik, Ankara, 1992.
  23. Eroğlu, Hamza, Türk Đnkılâp Tarihi, Ankara, 1990.
  24. Eroğlu, Hamza, Türkiye’de Devletçilik, Ankara, 1981.
  25. Feyzioğlu, Turhan, ‘‘Atatürk ve Devlet Hayatı’’ Atatürk Đlkeleri ve Đnkılâp Tarihi II, Ankara, 1986.
  26. Feyzioğlu, Turhan, Atatürk ve Milliyetçilik, Ankara, 1996.
  27. Fığlalı, Ethem Ruhi, “Đslâm ve Lâiklik”, Atatürk Düşüncesinde Din ve Lâiklik, Ankara, 1999.
  28. Genelkurmay Başkanlığı, Atatürkçülük: Atatürkçü Düşünce Sistemi, C. III, Ankara, 1997,
  29. Gökalp, Ziya, “Đktisada Doğru”, Makaleler, C.VII, Derleyen, Abdülhaluk Çay, Ankara, 1982.
  30. Gökalp, Ziya, “Đktisadi Mucize”, Makaleler, C.VII, Derleyen, Abdülhaluk Çay, Ankara, 1982.
  31. Gökalp, Ziya, Türkçülüğün Esasları, Đstanbul, 1955- 2005. Güneş, Đhsan, Birinci TBMM’nin Düşünce Yapısı, Ankara,1997. Güneş, Đhsan, Meşrutiyetten Cumhuriyet’e Türkiye’de Hükümetler: Programları ve Meclis