Journals / Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the inventory of statements about self-injury

Kendine zarar verme davranışı değerlendirme envanteri’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması

Pages
49–57
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: In the light of the findings, it was concluded that the Turkish version of ISAS could be used as a reliable and valid tool in assessing non-suicidal self-injury in research and treatment contexts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is defined as the repetitive deliberate destruction of one's body tissue without suicidal intent and is frequently repetitive.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The ISAS assesses 13 functions of NSSI, as well as the frequency of 12 NSSI behaviors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: In the light of the findings, it was concluded that the Turkish version of ISAS could be used as a reliable and valid tool in assessing non-suicidal self-injury in research and treatment contexts.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is defined as the repetitive deliberate destruction of one's body tissue without suicidal intent and is frequently repetitive. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (ISAS), a measure designed to comprehensively assess non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). The ISAS assesses 13 functions of NSSI, as well as the frequency of 12 NSSI behaviors. METHOD: The ISAS was administered to 529 high school students who had performed at least one NSSI behavior. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the scale were examined; for construct validity, the relationship between the Turkish form of the ISAS and various criteria scales was examined, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. RESULTS: Consistent with previous research, factor analysis of the functions scale confirmed the good-fit of the original's 2-dimension model (c²=243; s.d. = 59; NCI (c²/sd) = 4; RMSEA = 0.08 (.07-.09); CFI=0.97; NFI=0.97). In order to test the scale for construct validity, the Brief Symptom Inventory and Suicide Probability Scale were administered to participants, in addition to the ISAS, and the correlations with clinical constructs (e.g., suicidality, depression, anxiety) were in the expected direction. Also the reliability analysis revealed that the ISAS subscales demonstrated high internal consistency. CONCLUSION: In the light of the findings, it was concluded that the Turkish version of ISAS could be used as a reliable and valid tool in assessing non-suicidal self-injury in research and treatment contexts.

Özet

Amaç: “İntihar niyeti taşımayan” kendine zarar verme davranışı (KZVD), yaşamını sonlandırma amacı olmaksızın kişinin kasıtlı olarak beden dokularına zarar vermesi olarak tanımlanmıştır ve sıklıkla tekrarlayıcı biçimdedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kendine Zarar Verme Davranışı Değerlendirme Envanteri’nin (KZVDDE) psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesidir. Envanter, “intihar niyeti taşımayan” kendine zarar verme davranışının kapsamlı değerlendirilmesi için geliştirilmiştir. Envanter, 12 tip KZVD yanı sıra bu davranışların işlevlerini de değerlendirmektedir. Yöntem: Envanter, “en az bir KZVD gösteren” 529 lise öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. Envanterin, test-tekrar test güvenilirliği ile iç tutarlılığı araştırılmış; yapı geçerliği bağlamında kriter ölçeklerle ilişkileri incelenmiş ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Önceki araştırma sonuçları ile tutarlı biçimde, envanterin işlevler bölümü için yapılan faktör analizi, özgün envanterle örtüşen iki faktörlü iç yapıyı doğrulamıştır (c²=243; ss= 59; NCI (c²/ss)=4; RMSEA =0,08 (0,07-0,09); CFI=0,97; NFI=0,97). Katılımcılara, envanterin yanı sıra yine yapı geçerliği bağlamında, Kısa Semptom Envanteri ve İntihar Olasılığı Ölçeği uygulanmış ve klinik yapılar (intihar, depresyon, kaygı gibi) ile beklenen yönde ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Güveni lirlik analizleri de, envanterin iç tutarlılığı yüksek alt boyutlara sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuç: Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, KZVDDE’nin Türkçe formunun araştırma ve tedavi alanında KZVD’nin değerlendirilmesinde güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçüm aracı olarak kullanılabileceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLDİK, T., SOMER, O., BAŞAY, B. K., BAŞAY, Ö., ÖZBARAN, B. (2013). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the inventory of statements about self-injury. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 49–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/92049

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Başay-Kabukçu B, Bildik T, Tamar M ve ark. (2009) Assessment of the adolescents with self harming behavior and suicide attempts in an outpatient adolescent unit. The international Conference on Quality of Life in Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ESCAP), Budapeşte, Ağustos 22-26.
  2. Ceyhun AG, Ceyhun B (2003) Lise ve üniversite öğrencilerinde intihar olasılığının değerlendirilmesi. Klinik Psikiyatri 6: 217-24.
  3. Claassen CA, Trivedi M, Shimizu I ve ark. (2006) Epidemiology of nonfatal deliberate self-harm in the United States as described in three medical databases. Suicide Life-Threat 36: 192-212.
  4. Cull JG, Gill WS (1988) Suicide Probability Scale Manual. Western Psychological Services. Los Angeles, California. Derogatis LR (1992) The Brief Symptom Inventory-BSI Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual-II. Clinical Pscyhometric Research Inc., USA. Favazza AR (1998) The coming of age of self-mutilation. J Ner Ment Dis 186: 259-268.
  5. Glenn CR, Klonsky ED (2011) One-year test-retest reliability of the inventory of statements about self-injury (ISAS). Assessment 18: 375-8.
  6. Hintikka J, Tolmunen T, Rissanen ML ve ark. (2009) Mental Disorders in Self-Cutting Adolescents. J Adolescent Health 44: 464-7.
  7. Jacobson CM, Gould M (2007) The epidemiology and phenomenology of non-suicidal self-injurious behavior among adolescents: A critical review of the literature. Arch Suicide Res 11: 129-47.
  8. Jacobson CM, Muehlenkamp JJ, Miller AL ve ark. (2008) Psychiatric impairment among adolescents engaging in different types of deliberate self-harm. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 37: 363-75.
  9. Kerr PL, Muehlenkamp JJ, Turner JM (2010) Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A review of current research for family medicine and primary care physicians. J Am Board Fam Med 23: 240-59.
  10. Klonsky ED (2007) The functions of deliberate self-injury: A review of the evidence. Clin Psychol Rev 27: 226–39.
  11. Klonsky ED, Glenn CR (2008) Psychosocial risk and protective factors. Self-injury in youth: The essential guide to assessment and intervention, MK Nixon, N Heath (Ed), New York. Routledge s. 45-48.
  12. Klonsky ED, Glenn C (2009) Assessing the functions of non-suicidal self-injury: psychometric properties of the inventory of statements about self-injury (ISAS). Psychopathol Behav 31: 215-9.
  13. Klonsky ED, Muehlenkamp JJ (2007) Self-injury: A research review for the practitioner. J Clin Psychol 63: 1045-56.
  14. Klonsky ED, Olino TM (2008) Identifying clinically distinct subgroups of self-injurers among young adults: A laten