Journals / Veterinary Sciences and Practices / 2015 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

-

Çiftlik Hayvanlarında Brusellozisin Serolojik Tanısında Kullanılan Yöntemlerin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
1–1
Publication Date
2015-04-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it was suggested that the NERIFA can be used as a fast screening test such as the RBPT for diagnosis of Brucella antibodies in farm animals both in the field and in limited laboratory conditions and the present results are needed to be verified with more advanced techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to determine the sensitivity and comparative analysis of serological techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One hundred cattle and 100 sheep with a history of abortion both of that have not been vaccinated against brucellosis along with 100 horses from the farms of traditional management in Kars region of Turkey were included in the study, with a cluster sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it was suggested that the NERIFA can be used as a fast screening test such as the RBPT for diagnosis of Brucella antibodies in farm animals both in the field and in limited laboratory conditions and the present results are needed to be verified with more advanced techniques.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to determine the sensitivity and comparative analysis of serological techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock. One hundred cattle and 100 sheep with a history of abortion both of that have not been vaccinated against brucellosis along with 100 horses from the farms of traditional management in Kars region of Turkey were included in the study, with a cluster sampling method. Brucella antibodies were tested through Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), Serum Agglutination Test (SAT) and Non-­‐Enzymatic Rapid Immunofiltration Assay (NERIFA). Of these, 1/40 and above for the cattle and horse and 1/20 and above dilutions for sheep were considered as diagnostic titre in the SAT. Out of 100 cattle samples, 26 (26%) were detected positive in the RBPT, 23 (23%) in the SAT and 25 (25%) in the NERIFA in terms of Brucella antibodies. Out of 100 sheep sera samples, 18 (18%) with the RBPT, 14 (14%) with the SAT and 21 (21%) with the NERIFA were found positive for Brucella antibodies. For horse samples 13 (13%) with the RBPT, 14 (14%) with the SAT and 12 (12%) with the NERIFA were found positive for Brucella antibodies. The sensitivity and specifity of NERIFA were found as 87% and 93% in cattle, 85% and 89% in sheep and 78% and 98% in horse. The agreement between the NERIFA and the RBPT was found as almost perfectly as in cattle (kappa: 0.921) and horse (kappa: 0.862), while substantially in sheep (kappa: 0.713). In conclusion, it was suggested that the NERIFA can be used as a fast screening test such as the RBPT for diagnosis of Brucella antibodies in farm animals both in the field and in limited laboratory conditions and the present results are needed to be verified with more advanced techniques.

Özet

Çiftlik hayvanlarında brusellozisin teşhisinde serolojik tekniklerin kullanılabilirliği, karşılaştırmalı analizi ve duyarlılıklarının belirlenmesinin amaçlandığı bu çalışmada, geleneksel işletmeciliğin yapıldığı Kars yöresine ait atık hikayesi olan ve brusellozise karşı aşılanmamış 100 inek ve 100 koyun ile 100 adet at küme örnekleme yöntemi ile çalışmaya dahil edildi. Brucella antikorlarının varlığı Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), Serum Aglütinasyon Test (SAT) ve NERIFA teknikleri ile araştırıldı. SAT’da tanısal titre olarak inek ve atlar için 1/40 ve üzeri, koyunlar için 1/20 ve üzeri dilüsyonlar dikkate alındı. İncelenen 100 inek kan serum örneğinin RBPT ile 26 (%26)’sı, SAT ile 23 (%23)’ü ve NERIFA ile 25 (%25)’i, 100 koyun kan serum örneğinin RBPT ile 18 (%18)’i, SAT ile 14 (14)’ü ve NERIFA ile 21 (%21)’ i ve 100 at serum örneğinin RBPT ile 13 (%13)’ü, SAT ile 14 (%14)’ü ve NERIFA ile 12 (%12)’si Brucella antikorları yönünden pozitif saptandı. NERIFA’nın sensitivite ve spesifitesi ineklerde sırasıyla %87 ve %93; koyunlarda %85 ve %89; atlarda %78 ve %98 olarak saptandı. NERIFA ile RBPT arasındaki uyum inek (kappa: 0.921) ve atlarda (kappa: 0.862) mükemmele yakın iken; koyunlarda (kappa: 0.713) önemli derecede uyum sağlandı. Çiftlik hayvanlarında Brucella infeksiyonlarının teşhisinde saha ve sınırlı laboratuar koşullarında NERIFA’nın RBPT gibi hızlı tarama testi olarak kullanılabileceği ve sonuçların daha ileri tekniklerle doğrulanması gerektiği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, H., BÜYÜK, F. (2015). -. Veterinary Sciences and Practices, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/917716

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Acosta-González RI., González-Reyes I., Flores-Gutiérrez GH., 2006. Prevalence of Brucella abortus antibodies in equines of a tropical region of Mexico. Canadian Jounal of Veterinary Research, 70, 302-304. Adams LG., 1990. Advances in Brucellosis Research. Texas A&M University Press,
  2. First edition, College Station. Aggad H., and Boukraa L., 2006. Prevalence of bovine and human brucellosis in western Algeria: comparison of screening tests. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 12, 1/2, 119-128.
  3. Ahmed MO., Elmeshri SE., Abuzweda AR., Blauo M., Abouzeed YM., Ibrahim A., Salem H., Alzwam F., Abid S., Elfahem A., Elrais A., 2010. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in animals and human populations in the western mountains region in Libya, December 2006-January 2008. Euro Surveillance, 15, 30, 1-3. Al-Hankawe OKH., and Rhaymah MS., 2012. Comparison between ELISA and other serological tests for diagnosis of brucellosis in sheep in Ninevah Province. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 26, 2, 97-103.
  4. Alton GG., Jones LM., Angus RD., Verger JM., 1988. Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory. INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), Paris, France. Antunes JMAP., Allendorf SD., Appolinário CM., Peres MG., Perotta JH., Neves TB., Deconto I., Barros Filho IR., Biondo AW., Megid J., 2013. Serology for Brucella abortus in cart horses from an urban area in Brazil. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 65, 2, 619-621.
  5. Aydın F., Leloğlu N., Şahin M., Otlu S., 1994. Kars yöresinde sığır ve koyunlarda görülen abortların bakteriyolojik yönden araştırılması. I. Ulusal Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Kongresi. Ankara/Türkiye, s. 47. Büyük F., ve Şahin M., 2011. Invesigation of Brucella species from various samples of aborted cattle in Kars Province (Turkey) by cultural and molecular methods and epidemiological analysis of cases. The Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Kafkas, 17, 5, 809-816.
  6. Büyük F., Celebi O., Şahin M., Ünver A., Tazegül E., 2011. Brucella and Campylobacter mixed infection in two different sheep and goat herds. The Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Kafkas, 17 (Suppl A), 177-180.
  7. Büyüktanır O., Genç O., Celebi O., Yurdusev N., 2012. Rapid immunofiltration assay as a field diagnostic tool for ovine brucellosis. Journal of Immunoassay Immunochemistry, 33, 1, 35-47. Corbel MJ., 1997. Brucellosis: an Overview. Emerging Infection Disease, 3, 2, 213-221. Denny HR., 1972. Brucellosis in the horse.