Journals / Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Adverse Effects of Medication and Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Second Generation Antipsychotics: A Comparison of Long Acting Injectable and Oral Therapies

İkinci Kuşak Antipsikotik Kullanan Hastalarda İlaç Yan Etkileri ve Yaşam Kalitesi: Uzun Etkili Enjeksiyon ve Ağızdan Alınan Tedavilerin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
11–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further studies with specific design and the supplementation of larger samples are needed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Maintenance treatment with antipsychotic drugs for patients with schizophrenia is highly effective in decreasing the recurrence rate of the disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Forty-one patients receiving second generation antipsychotic drugs and 139 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were treated with oral second generation antipsychotic drugs and enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further studies with specific design and the supplementation of larger samples are needed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Maintenance treatment with antipsychotic drugs for patients with schizophrenia is highly effective in decreasing the recurrence rate of the disease. In the current study, we aimed to compare long-acting second generation antipsychotic drug injections and oral forms of second generation antipsychotic drugs in terms of their adverse effects on quality of life. Method: Forty-one patients receiving second generation antipsychotic drugs and 139 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were treated with oral second generation antipsychotic drugs and enrolled in the study. All patients were evaluated with Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANNS), extrapyramidal symptom rating scale (ESRS) and UKU, and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction questionnaire (Q-LES-Q). Results: The impact of adverse effects of oral second generation antipsychotic drugs on the daily performance of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was found to be significantly higher than that of the long acting injection antipsychotic drugs. The quality of life of patients receiving long acting second generation antipsychotic drug injection was significantly higher when compared with that of the patients treated with oral second generation antipsychotic drugs. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the long-acting second generation antipsychotic injection treatment was superior to second generation oral forms of antipsychotic drugs in terms of adverse effects and measures of quality of life. Further studies with specific design and the supplementation of larger samples are needed.

Özet

Amaç: Şizofreni hastalarında antipsikotik ilaçlarla tedavi, hastalığın yineleme oranlarını azaltmakta oldukça etkilidir. Bu çalışmada; şizofreni hastalarının tedavisinde kullanılan uzun etkili enjeksiyon ve ağızdan alı- nan 2. kuşak antipsikotik ilaçların, yan etki ve yaşam kalitesi açısından karşılaştırılmaları amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmaya şizofreni ve şizoaffektif bozukluk tanısı konmuş, uzun etkili 2. kuşak antipsikotikler ile tedavi edilen 41 hasta ve ağızdan alınan 2. kuşak antipsikotikler ile tedavi edilen 139 hasta dahil edilmiş- tir. Tüm hastalara Pozitif ve Negatif Sendrom Ölçeği (PANSS), Ekstrapiramidal Belirtileri Değerlendirme Ölçeği (EBDÖ) ve UKU (Ugvalg for Kliniske Undersgelser) Yan Etki Derecelendirme Ölçeği, Yaşamdan Hoşnutluk ve Doyum Anketi (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnarie; Q-LES-Q) uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Ağızdan 2. kuşak antipsikotik alan hastalarda uzun etkili 2. kuşak antipsikotik alanlara göre ilacın var olan yan etkilerinin hastanın günlük performansına etkisi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde yüksek bulunmuştur. Uzun etkili 2. kuşak antipsikotik alan hastaların yaşam kaliteleri ağızdan 2. kuşak antipsikotik alan hastalara göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Bu çalışmada uzun etkili 2. kuşak antipsikotik formlarının ağızdan alınan 2. kuşak antipsikotik formlarına göre ilaç yan etkisi ve yaşam kalitesi bakımından daha olumlu sonuçlarla ilişkili olduğu gösterilmiş- tir. Bununla birlikte bu alanda yapılacak daha özgün ve büyük ölçekli çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYKUT, D. S., ARSLAN, F. C., TİRYAKİ, A., KARAGÜZEL, E. Ö., KARAKULLUKÇU, S. (2017). Adverse Effects of Medication and Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Second Generation Antipsychotics: A Comparison of Long Acting Injectable and Oral Therapies. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 11–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/91627

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bai YM, Chen TT, Wu B ve ark. (2006) A comparative efficacy and safety study of long-acting risperidone injection and risperidone oral tablets among hospitalized patients: 12-week randomized, single-blind study. Pharmacopsychiatry 39:135-141.
  2. Bruijnzeel D, Suryadevara U, Tandon R (2014) Antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia: an update. Asian J Psychiatr 11:3-7.
  3. Chouinard G, Ross-Chouinard A, Annable L (1980) Extrapyramidal symptom rating scale. Can J Neurol Sci 7: 233. Collins EJ, Hogan TP, Deasi H (1991) Measurement of therapeutic response in schizophrenia: A critical survey. Schizophr Res 5:249-253.
  4. Diaz E, Neuse E, Sullivan MC ve ark. (2004) Adherence to conventional and atypical antipsychotics after hospital discharge. J Clin Psychiatry 65:354-360.
  5. Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W ve ark. (1993) Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a newmeasure. Psychopharmacol Bull 29:321-326.
  6. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M (1997) Structured Clinical interviewor DSMIV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) Clinical Version. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Pres Inc. Girardi P, Serafini G, Pompili M ve ark. (2010) Prospective open study of longacting injected risperidone versus oral antipsychotics in 88 chronically psychotic patients. Pharmacopsychiatry 43:66-72.
  7. Gray R, Wykes T, Parr AM ve ark. (2001) The use of outcome measures to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic medication: A comparison of Thorn graduate and CPN practice. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 8:191-196.
  8. Heckers S, Tandon R, Bustillo J (2010) Catatonia in the DSM shall we move or not? Schizophr Bull 36:205-207.
  9. Kane JM (2006) Review of treatments that can ameliorate nonadherence in patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 67 (Suppl 5):9-14.
  10. Kanea JM, Agugliab E, Altamurac AC ve ark. (1998) Guidelines for depot antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 8:55-66.
  11. Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA (1987) The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 13:261-76.
  12. Kostakoğlu AE, Batur S, Tiryaki A (1999) Pozitif ve negatif sendrom ölçeğinin (PANSS) Türkçe uyarlamasının geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 14:23-32.
  13. Leucht C, Heres S, Kane JM ve ark. (2011) Oral versus depot antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia a critical systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised long-term trials. Schizophr Res 127:83-92.
  14. Leucht S, Tardy M, Komossa K ve ark. (2012) Antipsychotic drugs versus placebo for relapse prev