SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 8

The intervening role of flow experience on the interaction between perceived transformational leadership and job performance: A research on academicians

Algılanan dönüştürücü liderlik tarzının iş performansı üzerindeki etkisinde akış deneyiminin aracılık rolü: Akademisyenler Üzerinde bir araştırma

Sezer Cihan GÜNAYDIN
Zeynep ÜNAL
Ömer Erdem KOÇAK
Pages
147–176
Publication Date
2023-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, experienced flow at work is such a powerful variable that it eliminates the positive impact of perceived transformational leadership on job performance in academician population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to analyze the mediating role of flow at work in the relationship between perceived transformational leadership and job performance of academicians.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 408 academicians who work both in public and private universities completed Transformational Leadership Scale, Flow Scale and Job Performance Scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, experienced flow at work is such a powerful variable that it eliminates the positive impact of perceived transformational leadership on job performance in academician population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akış deneyimi · Dönüştürücü Liderlik · İş Performansı

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the mediating role of flow at work in the relationship between perceived transformational leadership and job performance of academicians. This study adopted cross-sectional design to investigate the possible relationship between variables. A total of 408 academicians who work both in public and private universities completed Transformational Leadership Scale, Flow Scale and Job Performance Scale. Results of regression analysis indicated that perceived transformational leadership has a positive effect on job performance and flow at work has a full mediating role between perceived transformational leadership and job performance. The results also showed that positive effect of perceived transformational leadership on job performance of academicians disappears when academicians experience flow at work. Research findings confirmed the importance of flow at work. In other words, experienced flow at work is such a powerful variable that it eliminates the positive impact of perceived transformational leadership on job performance in academician population.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı algılanan dönüştürücü liderlik ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide işte akış deneyiminin aracılık rolünü analiz etmektir. Değişkenler arası olası ilişkilerin incelenmesi için kesitsel yöntemle Devlet ve Vakıf Üniversitelerinde çalışan 408 akademisyen; Dönüştürücü Liderlik Ölçeğini, Akış Ölçeğini ve İş Performansı Ölçeğini cevaplandırmışlardır. Regresyon analizi sonuçları beklenildiği gibi algılanan dönüştürücü liderliğin iş performansı üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğunu ve algılanan dönüştürücü liderlik ile iş performansı arasında işte akışın tam aracılık rolü olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuçlar ayrıca algılanan dönüştürücü liderliğin iş performansı üzerindeki olumlu etkisinin akademisyenlerin işte akış deneyimlemesi ile ortadan kalktığını göstermiştir. Araştırma bulguları işte akış deneyiminin önemini ortaya koymuştur. Bir başka deyişle, işte akış o derece önemli bir değişkendir ki; akademisyen popülasyonunda algılanan dönüştürücü liderliğin iş performansı üzerindeki olumlu etkisini görünmez kılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAYDIN, S. C., ÜNAL, Z., KOÇAK, Ö. E. (2023). The intervening role of flow experience on the interaction between perceived transformational leadership and job performance: A research on academicians. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 8, 147–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/915340

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abuhamdeh, S. (2020). Investigating the “flow” experience: Key conceptual and operational issues. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 158. Allan, B. A., Dexter, C., Kinsey, R., & Parker, S. (2018). Meaningful work and mental health: Job satisfaction as a moderator. Journal of Mental Health, 27(1), 38-44.
  2. Atar, A., & Konaklıoğlu, E. (2018). Konaklama işletmelerindeki liderlik davranış türlerinin örgütsel sessizlik, örgütsel sinizm ve psikolojik iyi oluşa etkisi: Türkiye ve İtalya üzerine bir çalışma. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 45-65.
  3. Bakker, A. (2008). Building engagement in the workplace. In The peak performing organization (pp. 96-118).
  4. Routledge. Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of vocational behavior, 72(3), 400-414.
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Barrick, M. R., Thurgood, G. R., Smith, T. A., & Courtright, S. H. (2015). Collective organizational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 111–135.
  6. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology press. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational dynamics, 13(3), 26-40.
  7. Bass. B. M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Leader Form, Rater Form, and Scoring. California. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/11164-000
  8. Blau, P. M. (1974). Presidential address: Parameters of social structure. American sociological review, 615-635.
  9. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human performance, 10(2), 99-109.
  10. Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Oxford University Press.
  11. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row. Christandl, F., Mierke, K., & Peifer, C. (2018). Time flows: Manipulations of subjective time progression affect recalled flow and per