Journals / Turkish Journal of Science and Technology / 2023 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1

Optimization Studies on the Changeable Components of Hydroelectric Power Plants

Pages
97–112
Publication Date
2023-03-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, real situation studies were carried out regarding design flow rate selection, forced pipe diameter optimization and transmission channel sizing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The design flow rate, the dimensions of the transmission structure and the penstock size have a large impact on the cost of run-of-river type hydroelectric power plants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Equipment costs constitute a large part of the total budget of the plant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, real situation studies were carried out regarding design flow rate selection, forced pipe diameter optimization and transmission channel sizing.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hydroelectric power plants · optimization · investment cost

Abstract

The design flow rate, the dimensions of the transmission structure and the penstock size have a large impact on the cost of run-of-river type hydroelectric power plants. Equipment costs constitute a large part of the total budget of the plant. Optimum sizing, which maximizes the use of hydraulic potential, does not fit together with optimum sizing, which is necessary to obtain economic benefit from its investment. The main design parameters can be selected with the help of an optimization study in terms of both economic benefit and hydraulic potential. In this study, an easy to implement model, aimed at determining the costs associated with the different components in the structural organization of a hydroelectric power plant, is developed by a feasibility study to overcome the difficulties in practice. Gokcekoy HEPP, built in Turkey, was selected as the system. Annual energy production values were calculated by taking into account the current energy market conditions in Turkey. In addition, real situation studies were carried out regarding design flow rate selection, forced pipe diameter optimization and transmission channel sizing.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNA, M. C., AYDIN, A. B. (2023). Optimization Studies on the Changeable Components of Hydroelectric Power Plants. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 97–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/913809

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Jacobson Mark Z, Delucchı Mark A. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy policy 2011; 39(3): 1154-1169. Berga L. The role of hydropower in climate change mitigation and adaptation: a review. Engineering 2016; 2(3): 313-318.
  2. Dursun B, Gokcol C. The role of hydroelectric power and contribution of small hydropower plants for sustainable development in Turkey. Renewable Energy 2011; 36(4): 1227-1235.
  3. Demarty M, Bastien J. GHG emissions from hydroelectric reservoirs in tropical and equatorial regions: Review of 20 years of CH4 emission measurements. Energy Policy 2011; 39(7): 4197-4206.
  4. Mao G, Wang S, Tenq Q, Zuo J, Tan X., Wang H, Liu Z. The sustainable future of hydropower: a critical analysis of cooling units via the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving and Life Cycle Assessment methods. J Clean Prod 2017; 142 (4): 2446–2453.
  5. Yildiz V, Vrugt JA. A toolbox for the optimal design of run-of-river hydropower plants. Environmental modelling & software 2019; 111: 134-152. Mutlu R. Feasibility Study Of A Hydropower Project: Case Study Of Niksar HEPP, Turkey. vol, 5, 265-288, 2010. Bartle A. Hydropower potential and development activities. Energy policy 2002; 30(14): 1231-1239. International Hydroelectric Association: Hydropower status report; sector trends and insights, 2019. Küçükbeycan M. RETScreen decision support system for prefeasibility analysis of small hydropower projects. MSc, Middle East Techinal University, Ankara, Turkey, 2008.
  6. Lehner B, Czisch G, Vassolo S. The impact of global change on the hydropower potential of Europe: a model-based analysis. Energy Policy 2005; 33(7): 839-855.
  7. Eurelectric, Study on the importance of harnessing the hydropower resources of the world, Union of the Electric Industry (Eurelectric), Hydro Power and other Renewable Energies Study Committee, Brussels, 1997.
  8. Sharma DP, Verma GL, Bahadur AK. Selecting installed capacity for a run-ofriver plant. Journal of International Water Power & Dam Construction 1980; 32: 23–26.
  9. Sharma MG, Das D, Sharma J. Selection of optimum capacity for run-of-river plant. Journal of Dam Engineering 2002; 23: 97–117. Gingold PR. The optimum size of small run-of-river plants. Journal of International Water Power & Dam Construction 1981; 33: 26–39. Fahlbuch F. Optimum capacity of a run-of-river plant. Journal of International Water Power & Dam Construction 1983; 35: 25–37. Fahlbu