SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstatistikçiler Dergisi:İstatistik ve Aktüerya / 2018 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Measures of departure from marginal homogeneity model in square contingency tables

Karesel olumsallık tablolarında marjinal homojenlik modelinden sapma ölçüleri

Gökçen Altun(BARTIN UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-4311-6508
Serpil Aktaş(Hacettepe University)
Pages
93–108
Publication Date
2018-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the measures of departure are calculated for each category, the categories causing the departure from the MH model can be obtained and interpreted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the measures representing the departure from MH model is introduced for square contingency tables and standard errors of these measures is calculated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These measures lies between (-1,1) and represent the departure degree from MH model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the measures of departure are calculated for each category, the categories causing the departure from the MH model can be obtained and interpreted.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Karesel olumsallık tablosu · marjinal homojenlik modeli · sapma ölçüsü

Abstract

In this study, the measures representing the departure from MH model is introduced for square contingency tables and standard errors of these measures is calculated. These measures lies between (-1,1) and represent the departure degree from MH model. Three real data sets are used as the illustrative examples. While the measures of departure are calculated for each category, the categories causing the departure from the MH model can be obtained and interpreted.

Özet

In this study, the measures representing the departure from MH model is introduced for square contingency tables and standard errors of these measures is calculated. These measures lies between (-1,1) and represent the departure degree from MH model. Three real data sets are used as the illustrative examples. While the measures of departure are calculated for each category, the categories causing the departure from the MH model can be obtained and interpreted.

🔖

Cite This Article

Altun, G., Aktaş, S. (2018). Measures of departure from marginal homogeneity model in square contingency tables. İstatistikçiler Dergisi:İstatistik ve Aktüerya, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 93–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/907254

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Agresti, A. 2010, Analysis of ordinal categorical data (Vol. 656). John Wiley & Sons.
  2. 2] Stuart, A., 1955, A test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions in a two-way classification. Biometrica 42, 412-416
  3. Tahata, K., Iwashita, T., Tomizawa, S., 2008, Measure of departure from conditional marginal homogeneity for square contingency tables with ordered categories. Statistics, 42(5), 453-466
  4. Lawal, B, H,,2008 On Fitting the Conditional Difference Asymmetry Models to Square Contingency Tables with Nominal Categories, Quality & Quantity, 42(5), 605-612.
  5. Yamamoto, K., Ando, S., & Tomizawa, S, 2011. A Measure of Departure from Average Margınal Homogeneıty for Square Contıngency Tables wıth Ordered Categorıes. REVSTAT–Statistical Journal, 9(2), 115-126.
  6. Tahata, K., Kawasaki, K., Tomizawa S., 201) Asymmetry Index on Marginal Homogeneity for Square Contingecy Tables with Ordered Categories. Open Journal of Statistics, Vol:2 Page:198-203
  7. Agresti, A., 2003 Categorical data analysis (Vol. 482). John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK) Marriage and Divorce Statistics 1991,2001,2011
  9. Lawal, B, H,,2008 On Fitting the Conditional Difference Asymmetry Models to Square Contingency Tables with Nominal Categories, Quality & Quantity, 42(5), 605-612.
  10. Tahata, K., Kawasaki, K., Tomizawa S., 201) Asymmetry Index on Marginal Homogeneity for Square Contingecy Tables with Ordered Categories. Open Journal of Statistics, Vol:2 Page:198-203