SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3

Stable Peace and Reconciliation Between Sovereign States

Egemen Devletler Arasında İstikrarlı Barış ve Uzlaşma Süreci

Nazif MANDACI
Pages
415–433
Publication Date
2012-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study discusses in what stage of diplomatic rapprochement and stable peace and under what conditions a full-fledged reconciliation process as envisaged in the literature of conflict resolution can be carried out

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the discipline of international relations the concepts of reconciliation, rapprochement and stable peace have overlapping contents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In other words, unlike conventional diplomatic strategies, reconciliation on this sort of conflicts invokes nations’ mutual empathy and societal internalization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study discusses in what stage of diplomatic rapprochement and stable peace and under what conditions a full-fledged reconciliation process as envisaged in the literature of conflict resolution can be carried out
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uzlaşma · köklü çatışma · istikrarlı barış

Abstract

In the discipline of international relations the concepts of reconciliation, rapprochement and stable peace have overlapping contents. In the same vein, it is generally assumed that nations reconcile in concomitant with the stable peace which evolves from diplomatic rapprochement. However, it is underlined in the discipline of conflict resolution that intractable conflicts require special attention for they need drastic societal cognitive and emotional shifts beyond diplomatic elit-led rapprochement. In other words, unlike conventional diplomatic strategies, reconciliation on this sort of conflicts invokes nations’ mutual empathy and societal internalization. Furthermore, reconciliation is a public process. This study discusses in what stage of diplomatic rapprochement and stable peace and under what conditions a full-fledged reconciliation process as envisaged in the literature of conflict resolution can be carried out

Özet

Uluslararası ilişkiler literatüründe egemen devletler arasında uzlaşma, istikrarlı barış ve yakınlaşma içiçe geçmiş kavramlardır. Aynı şekilde diplomatik anlamda başlayan yakınlaşmanın kalıcı bir barışa dönüşmesi ile ulusların aralarındaki çatışmaları sonlandırdıkları kabul gören diğer bir görüştür. Bununla birlikte, çatışma çözümleme disiplininde kökü derinlerde çatışmalar özel olarak ele alınmaktadır ve diplomatik yakınlaşmanın çok ötesinde karşılıklı olarak toplumsal anlamda bilişsel ve duygusal değişimleri gerektirdiklerinin altı çizilmektedir. Diğer deyişle, bu tür çatışmalara yönelik uzlaşma süreçleri alışıldık diplomatik tavırlardan farklı olarak karşılıklı toplumsal sahiplenmeyi, empatiyi gerektirmektedirler. Daha da önemlisi uzlaşma görülebilir bir süreçtir. Bu çalışma uzlaşma sürecinin egemen devletler arasında diplomatik yakınlaşma ve istikrarlı barışın hangi aşamasında çatışma çözümleme literatüründe öngörüldüğü biçimiyle ve hangi şartlar altında yürütülebileceğini tartışmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

MANDACI, N. (2012). Stable Peace and Reconciliation Between Sovereign States. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 415–433. https://ajindex.com/articles/904845

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adler, E., Barnett ve Michael N. (1996) “Governing Anarchy: A Research Agenda for the Study of Security Communities” Ethics and International Affairs, 10(1): 63-98.
  2. Alderson, K. ve Hurrell, A. (2000)
  3. Hedley Bull on International Society, Londra, Macmillan Press.
  4. Alger, C.F. (2007) “Peace Studies as a Transdisciplinary Project” Charles et al.(eds.) Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, London-New York, Routledge. Aptel, C. (2011) “International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals: Recognizing or Stigmatizing” Paige, A.(eds.) Identities in Transition: Challenges for Transitional Justice in Divided Societies, International Center for Transitional Justice, Cambridge University Press.
  5. Arya, N. (2007) “Peace Through Health” Charles et al.(eds.) Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, London- New York, Routledge. Auerbach, Y. (2004) “The Role of Forgiveness in Reconciliation” Yaacov, B.S.T. (eds.) From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  6. Bar-Tal, D. ve Bennink, G.H. (2004) “The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process” Yaacov, B.S.T(eds.) From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  7. Bond, P. (2000) From Apartheid to Neorealism in South Africa, Londra, Pluto Press.
  8. Bull, H. (2002) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Orders in World Politics, New York, Palgrave. Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C. and True, J. (2005)
  9. Theories of International Relations, New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Burton, J.W. (1990) Conflict: Resolution and Provention, New York, MacMillan. A. (eds.) Identities in Transition: Challenges for Transitional Justice in Divided Societies, International Center for Transitional Justice, Cambridge University Press.
  10. Burton, J.W. (1998) “History of Conflict Resolution’: An Entry Prepared for the Institute of Peace Studies, Seoul, Korea, for its World Encyclopedia of Peace”, Occasional Paper Series. Burton, J.W. ve Dukes, F. (1990) Conflict Practices in Management and Settlement and Resolution, New York, St. Martin Press.
  11. Buzan, B. Jones, C ve Little, R. (1993) The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, Columbia University Press.
  12. Buzan, B.(2004) From International to World Society: English School Theory and Social Structure of Globalisation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  13. Cabezudo, A. ve Haavelsrud, M. (2007) “Rethinking Peace Education” Charles et al.(eds.) Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, London-New York: