Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3

Loan to Deposit Ratio, Non-Core Liability and Profitability in the Turkish Banking Sector: Evidences From Dynamic Panel Model

Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Kredi Mevduat Oranı, Çekirdek Dışı Yükümlülükler ve Kârlılık: Dinamik Panel Modelinden Bulgular

Pages
495–506
Publication Date
2018-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results suggest that after some threshold, increasing the LDR would eventually erode bank profitability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we examine the relationship between the loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) and the profitability of Turkish banks using quarterly data over the period 2002-2015.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Applying the fixed effect GMM technique, we find that there exists a positive and significant relationship between the LDR and all three profitability measures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results suggest that after some threshold, increasing the LDR would eventually erode bank profitability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kredi mevduat oranı · banka kârlılığı · çekirdek dışı yükümlülükler

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the relationship between the loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) and the profitability of Turkish banks using quarterly data over the period 2002-2015. We employ three different profitability measures as dependent variables; return on asset (ROA), return on equity (ROE) and net interest margin (NIM). Applying the fixed effect GMM technique, we find that there exists a positive and significant relationship between the LDR and all three profitability measures. Estimation results also suggest that the positive impact on profitability declines with the ratio, that is, there are significant non-linearities. Specifically, the effect of the LDR on ROA and ROE increases at a decreasing rate, but the relationship between the LDR and NIM appears to be linear. However, results for the subsample 2002-2009 indicate that the association between the LDR and profitability is positive and linear. These results suggest that after some threshold, increasing the LDR would eventually erode bank profitability. The findings are consistent with the recent developments in the Turkish banking sector.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türk ticari bankacılık sektörü kârlılığı ile kredi mevduat oranı arasındaki ilişki 2002-2015 yılları arasında çeyreklik veri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada kârlılık göstergesi olarak üç farklı değişken; net faiz marjı, aktif ve özsermaye kârlılığı kullanılmıştır. Dinamik panel modelinde sabit etkili GMM yöntemi kullanılarak elde ettiğimiz sonuçlara göre kredi mevduat oranıyla bankacılık kârlılığı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişki mevcuttur. Bu pozitif ilişki; aktif (ROA) ve özsermaye (ROE) kârlılıklarıyla doğrusal olmayan (azalarak artan), net faiz marjıyla (NIM) ise doğrusal (sabit artan) bir niteliğe sahiptir. 2002-2009 yılları arasında ise kredi mevduat oranıyla her üç kârlılık değişkeni arasındaki ilişkinin pozitif ve doğrusal olduğu görülmektedir. Bulgular, kredi mevduat oranı artışının belli bir noktadan sonra bankacılık kârlılığını olumsuz etkilediğini göstermektedir. Bulgular, son dönemde Türk bankacılık sektöründe gözlenen gelişmelerle örtüşmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDEMİR, R., ÖVENÇ, G., KOYUNCU, A. (2018). Loan to Deposit Ratio, Non-Core Liability and Profitability in the Turkish Banking Sector: Evidences From Dynamic Panel Model. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 495–506. https://ajindex.com/articles/904687

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Altunbaş, Y. ve Molyneux, P. (1995), Gümrük birliğine giriş sürecinde Türk bankacılık sisteminin değerlendirilmesi, Uzman Gözüyle Bankacılık Dergisi, Sayı.11 Arellano, M., and S. Bond (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.
  2. Athanasoglou, P., Delis, M.D. ve Staikouras, C. K. (2006). Determinants of Bank Profitability in the South Eastern European Region, Bank of Greece, Working Paper, No.47 Aydemir, R., & Ovenc, G. (2016). Interest rates, the yield curve and bank profitability in an emerging market economy. Economic Systems, 40(4), 670-682.
  3. Baltagi, B. H. (2008),
  4. Econometric analysis of panel data, John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, 4th edition. Banerjee, A., Cole, S., ve Duflo, E. (2003).
  5. Bank Financing in India, Department of Economics, MIT Berger, A. N. ve Humphrey D. B. (1985).Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking, Erişim: 18 Mart, 2016, http://www.nber.org/chapters/c7237.pdf
  6. BIS (2014), Committee on the Global Financial System, EME banking systems and regional financial integration, CGFS Papers No:51. BIS (2016), Locational Banking Statistics, http://www.bis.org/ statistics/bankstats.htm?m=6%7C31%7C69, 15.04.2016
  7. Cooper, M., Jackson, W. ve Petterson, G. (2003), Evidence of Predictability in The Cross-Section of Bank Stock Returns, Journal of Banking and Financa 27, 817-850
  8. Costa, O., Khan, J., Levy, C., Natale, A., Tanrikulu, O., (2014).
  9. Risk in emerging markets, McKinsey&Company, McKinsey Working Papers on Risk, Number: 56 Cragg, J.G. ve S.G. Donald. (1993), Testing Identifiability and Specification in Instrumental Variable Models, Econometric Theory, 9, 222 – 240. Davidson, R. ve Mackinnon, J. G. (1993), Estimation and inference in econometrics, Econometric Theory, Vol. 11, No. 3 (Aug., 1995), pp. 631-635, Published by: Cambridge University Press Demirgüc-Kunt, A. ve Huizinga, H. (2000), Financial Structure and Bank Profitability, Development of Research Group, The World Bank and Department of Economics. Greene, W. H. (2008).
  10. Econometric Analysis, Sixth Edition,
  11. New York University, New Jersey. Güngör, G. Y., (2012). Bankaların Kurumsal Kredi Portföyü ve Kredi Riskinin Ölçümü. (Uzmanlık yeterlilik tezi). Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası, Bankacılık ve Finansal Kuruluşlar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
  12. Hansen, L.P. ve Singleton K. J. (1982), Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Mo