Journals / Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

6-15 yaş arası çocuklarda görsel motor birleştirme işlevlerinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
97–104
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean VMI scores presented in this study represent performance of children in middle and middle-upper socio-economic status and may not represent the normal performance range of children from lower SES.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Visual-motor integration skills are considered an essential domain of clinical and psycho-educational assessment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The goal of the present investigation is to provide the Turkish norms for the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Visual-Motor Integration Test (VMI-4th) for children and adolescents between the ages of 6-15 years as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean VMI scores presented in this study represent performance of children in middle and middle-upper socio-economic status and may not represent the normal performance range of children from lower SES.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Visual-motor integration skills are considered an essential domain of clinical and psycho-educational assessment. The goal of the present investigation is to provide the Turkish norms for the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Visual-Motor Integration Test (VMI-4th) for children and adolescents between the ages of 6-15 years as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Method: A total of 1887 children from elementary and high schools in the city of Bursa were recruited for this study. From this sample 44 children were re-tested 3-4 weeks following the first administration for test-retest reliability. Results: Findings showed clear developmental trajectories in visual-motor integration skills. Significant performance increments were observed in six month intervals for ages 6 and 7. Starting from age 8, norms were established for each age group separately. Girls and boys performed similarly on the VMI-4. Test- retest correlation was modest but within an acceptable range. Conclusion: The age-based norms established for the VMI-4 in this study can be used to assess children between the ages of 6-15 years as part of a clinical neuropsychological and a psycho-educational assessment. The mean VMI scores presented in this study represent performance of children in middle and middle-upper socio-economic status and may not represent the normal performance range of children from lower SES.

Özet

Amaç: Görsel-motor birleştirme yetileri klinik ve psiko-eğitimsel değerlendirmenin öncelikli alanlarından birini oluşturur. Bu araştırmanın amacı kapsamlı bir nöropsikolojik test bataryası norm çalışması içerisinde uygulanan Beery-Buktenica Gelişimsel Görsel-Motor Birleştirme Testinin (GMTB-4) 6-15 yaş arası kız ve erkek çocuklarda Türk normlarını ortaya koymaktır. Yöntem: Araştırmanın örneklemi Bursa ilinin sınırları içerisinde bulunan ilköğretim okulları ve liselerden toplam 1887 çocuktan oluşmuştur. Bu örneklem grubundan seçilen 44 çocuğa ilk test aşamasını takip eden 3-4 hafta içerisinde test tekrar uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Sonuçlar görsel-motor birleştirme becerisinin gelişiminde anlamlı gelişimsel dönemlere işaret etmektedir. Altı ve 7 yaş gruplarında performans değerleri altı aylık gelişim dönemlerinde anlamlı olarak farklılık göstermiştir. Test performans puanları 8 yaştan başlayarak bir senelik yaş dilimleri için ayrı ayrı tespit edilmiştir. Kız ve erkek çocuklar arasında hiçbir yaş grubunda performans puanları anlamlı olarak farklılaşmamıştır. Test-tekrar test korelasyonları anlamlıdır. Sonuç: Bu çalışma kapsamında ortaya konan yaş temelli normlar 6-15 yaş arası çocukların nöropsikolojik ve psiko-eğitimsel değerlendirmelerinde kullanılmaya elverişlidir. Bununla birlikte veriler orta ve üst sosyoekonomik düzeylerden toplandığından ortalama performans puanları alt sosyoekonomik düzeyi yansıtmayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKOK-KILIÇ, A., DIKEC-ELMASTAS, B., CAN, H. (2010). 6-15 yaş arası çocuklarda görsel motor birleştirme işlevlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 97–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/89185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ardilla A, Roselli M (1994) Development of language, memory, and visuospatial abilities in 5 to 12 year old children using a neuropsychological battery. Dev Neuropsychol, 10: 97-120.
  2. Beery KE (1967) Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration,1st ed., Chicago. Follett Publishing. Beery KE (1997) The Beery-Buktenika Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, 4th ed., New Jersey. Modern Curriculum Press.
  3. Bloch MH, Sukhodolsky DG, Leckman JF ve ark. (2006) Fine-motor skill deficits in childhood predict adulthood tic severity and global psychosocial functioning in Tourette's syndrome. J Child Psychol Psyciatr, 47: 551-9.
  4. Bonifacci P (2004) Children with low motor ability have lower visual-motor integration ability but unaffected perceptual skills. Hum Mov Sci, 23: 157-68.
  5. Bradley-Johnson S (1998) Test Reviews. Psychol Sch, 35: 409-15.
  6. Klein AE (1978) The validity of the Beery Test of Visual-Motor Integration in predicting achievement in kindergarten, first and second grades. Educ Psychol Measur, 38: 457-61.
  7. Kleinman BL, Stalcup A (1991) The effect of graded craft activities on visuomotor integration in an inpatient child psychiatry population. Am J Occup Ther, 45: 324-30.
  8. Knoff HM, Sperling BL (1986) Gifted Children and Visual-motor development: A comparison of Bender Gestalt and VMI test performance. Psychol Sch, 23: 247-51.
  9. Kulp MT (1999) Relationship between visual motor integration skill and academic performance in kindergarten through third grade. Optom Vis Sci, 76:158-163.
  10. Kulp MT, Sortor JM (2003) Clinical value of the Beery visual-motor integration supplemental tests of visual perception and motor coordination. Optom Vis Sci, 80: 312-5.
  11. Leton D, Miyamoto L, Ryckman D (1987) Psychometric evaluations of learning disabled students. Psychol Sch, 24: 201-9.
  12. Olvera RL, Semrud-Clikeman M, Pliszka SR ve ark. (2005) Neuropsychological deficits in adolescents with conduct disorder and comorbid bipolar disorder: a pilot study, Bipolar Disord, 7: 57-67.
  13. Ozer S (2007) Turkish children's Bender-Gestalt test performance: a pilot study and preliminary norms, Percept Mot Skills, 105: 872-82.
  14. Piek JP, Dyck MJ (2004) Sensory motor deficits in children with developmental disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autistic disorder. Hum Mov Sci, 23: 475-88.
  15. Rhodes RL, D'Amato RC, Rothlisberg BA (2009) Utilizing a neuropsychological paradigm for understanding common educational and psychological tests. Handbook of Clinical Child Neuropsychology, 3rd ed,