SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

PUBLICATIONS ON ACCOUNTING STANDARDS IN WEB OF SCIENCE DATABASE: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

WEB OF SCIENCE VERİTABANINDA MUHASEBE STANDARTLARI YAYINLARI: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ

Ahmet KAYA
Zeynep HATUNOĞLU
Pages
1–26
Publication Date
2023-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that most publications originate from the United States, most are published in the last 10 years, and Accounting Review is the most-cited journal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bibliometric analysis allows the analysis and evaluation of scientific studies by different methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This subject area is scanned in 1851 publications within the “Business-Finance” category on June 25, 2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that most publications originate from the United States, most are published in the last 10 years, and Accounting Review is the most-cited journal.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Muhasebe Standartları · İşletme-Finans · Web of Science

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis allows the analysis and evaluation of scientific studies by different methods. This study aims to present an overview of the “Accounting Standards” literature in the journals indexed on the Web of Science. This subject area is scanned in 1851 publications within the “Business-Finance” category on June 25, 2021. R-Studio program is used in the analysis and we contribute by applying bibliometric analysis to articles published in these fields since 1970. The results show that most publications originate from the United States, most are published in the last 10 years, and Accounting Review is the most-cited journal.

Özet

Bibliyometrik analiz, yayınların farklı yöntemlerle analiz edilmesini ve bilimsel çalışmaların değerlendirilmesini sağlayan bir yöntemdir. Bu çalışma, Web of Science'da indekslenen dergilerdeki Muhasebe Standartları literatürüne, bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi kullanarak genel bir bakış sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İşletme-Finans kategorisindeki Muhasebe Standartları konu başlığı 25 Haziran 2021 tarihinde taranmıştır. Toplam 1851 yayın R Studio programı kullanılarak analize tabi tutulmuştur. Bu çalışma, 1970 yılından bu yana bu alanlarda yayınlanan araştırmalara bibliyometrik analiz uygulayarak yazına katkı sağlamaktadır. Sonuçlar, en çok yayının Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde ve son 10 yılda yapıldığını, çalışmaların yıllık büyüme oranının %7,81 olduğunu ve en çok atıf alan derginin Accounting Review olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, A., HATUNOĞLU, Z. (2023). PUBLICATIONS ON ACCOUNTING STANDARDS IN WEB OF SCIENCE DATABASE: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 1–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/887437

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akgün, M., & Karataş, B. (2017). Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış Dergisinde Yayımlanan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi (2000-2016). Accounting & Auditing Review, 17(52), 19-34.
  2. Alkan, G., & Özkaya, H. (2015). Türk Muhasebe ve Finans Yazınının SSCI’da 20 Yılı. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (66), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.396538.
  3. Antwi, I.F. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis: Agency Theory in Accounting. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 7(1), 56-76. https://doi.org/10.32602/jafas.2021.003.
  4. Ashbaugh, H., & Pincus, M. (2001).
  5. Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings. Journal of accounting research, 39(3), 417-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00020.
  6. Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings Quality in UK Private Firms: Comparative Loss Recognition Timeliness. Journal of accounting and economics, 39(1), 83-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001
  7. Ball, R., Robin, A., & Wu, J.S. (2003). Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in Four East Asian Countries. Journal of accounting and economics, 36(1-3), 235-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.003.
  8. Balstad, M.T., & Berg, T. (2020). A long-term bibliometric analysis of journals influencing Management Accounting and Control Research. Journal of Management Control, 30(4), 357-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-019-00287-8.
  9. Barth, M.E., Landsman, W.R., & Lang, M.H. (2008). International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00287.x
  10. Beşel, F. & Yardımcıoğlu, F. (2017). Maliye Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Analizi: 2007-2016 Dönemi. Maliye Dergisi, 172, 133-151.
  11. Beuren, I.M., Machado, D.G., & Dal Vesco, D.G. (2015). Sociometric and Bibliometric Analysis of Research Published in Management Accounting Research. Contabılıdade Gestao E Governanca, 18(1), 83-105.
  12. Bulut Deniz, M., & Çukacı, Y.C. (2018). Mevcut Muhasebe Uygulamaları Ve Muhasebe Standartları Açısından Önemlilik Kavramı Ve Maddi Olmayan Duran Varlıkların Bu Bağlamda Değerlendirilmesi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(22), 147-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13503.
  13. Burgstahler, D.C., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). The Importance of Reporting Incentives: Earnings Management In European Private And Public Firms. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 983-1016. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4093095
  14. Chan, L.K., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T