Journals / Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Temperamentand Character Personality Dimensions inwith Bipolar I Disorder Patients

Bipolar duygudurum bozukluğu-1 hastalarında mizaç ve kişilik özelliği boyutları

Pages
149–156
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lower self-directedness and cooperativeness scores in the bipolar group appeared to be associated with more immature personality traits.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To compare Cloninger’s dimensions of temperament and character in patients with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and healthy controls from the general population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study included 96 BP-I patients (according to DSM-IV-TR criteria) that were admitted to a psychiatric hospital in Iran due to an acute episode of mania or depression, or a mixed episode during 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lower self-directedness and cooperativeness scores in the bipolar group appeared to be associated with more immature personality traits.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To compare Cloninger’s dimensions of temperament and character in patients with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and healthy controls from the general population. Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study included 96 BP-I patients (according to DSM-IV-TR criteria) that were admitted to a psychiatric hospital in Iran due to an acute episode of mania or depression, or a mixed episode during 2011. Following stabilization of the acute phase, the patients completed the 125-item Temperament and Character Inventory-Persian Version of (TCI-125-PV). The scale’s 7 dimensions of temperament and character were compared between the bipolar group and 1212 healthy controls via independent samples t-test. Moreover, the correlation between temperament and character scores, and age, duration of disorder, and mood variables (depression and mania scores) were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: The bipolar patients had significantly higher harm avoidance (P= 0.001), and lower reward dependency (P= 0.001), persistence (P =0.044), cooperativeness (P= 0.001), self-directedness (P= 0.001), and self-transcendence (P= 0.004) scores than the controls. Female patients had lower reward dependency (P= 0.001), self-directedness (P= 0.001), and cooperativeness (P= 0.001) scores than male patients. In addition, TCI-125- PV scores were not strongly correlated with depression or mania scores, duration of disorder, or marital status. Conclusion: The personality profiles of the BP-I patients differed from those of the controls. Lower self-directedness and cooperativeness scores in the bipolar group appeared to be associated with more immature personality traits.

Özet

Amaç: Cloninger’in mizaç ve kişilik boyutlarına göre bipolar duygudu- rum bozukluğu-1 (BDB-1) hastaları ile genel toplumdaki sağlıklı kont- rolleri karşılaştırmak. Yöntem: Bu kesitsel çalışmaya 2011 yılında akut mani, depresyon veya karma dönem ile İran’daki bir psikiyatri hastanesine başvurmuş olan 96 BDB-1 (DSM-IV-TR ölçütlerine göre) hastası dahil edilmiştir. Akut dönemin yatışmasından sonra hastalar 125 maddelik Mizaç ve Kişilik Envanteri-İran Sürümü’nü (MKE-125-İS) doldurmuşlardır. Ölçekteki mizaç ve kişiliğin 7 boyutu, bipolar grup ile 1212 sağlıklı kontrolle ba- ğımsız örneklem t-testi kullanılarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Ayrıca, mizaç ve kişilik puanları, yaş, hastalığın süresi ve duygudurum değişkenleri (dep- resyon ve mani puanları) arasındaki ilişki Pearson korelasyon katsayısı kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Bipolar hastaların zarardan kaçınma puanları sağlıklı kontrol- lerle kıyaslayınca anlamlı olarak daha yüksek (P= 0,001); ödüle bağlılık (P= 0,001), süreklilik (P = 0,044), iş birliği (P= 0,001), kendini ida- re edebilme (P= 0,001), kendini aşma (P= 0,004) puanları ise anlamlı olarak daha düşük bulunmuştur. Kadın hastaların ödüle bağlılık (P= 0,001), kendini idare edebilme (P= 0,001) ve iş birliği (P= 0,001) pu- anları erkeklere göre daha düşük olarak saptanmıştır. Ek olarak, MKE- 125-İS puanları ile depresyon ve mani puanları, hastalığın süresi veya medeni durum arasında güçlü bir ilişki kurulamamıştır. Sonuç: BDB-1 hastalarının kişilik profilleri kontrollerden farklıdır. Bi- polar gruptaki düşük kendini idare edebilme ve iş birliği puanlarının daha çok olgunlaşmamış kişilik özellikleriyle ilişkili olduğu anlaşılmak- tadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BORDBAR, M. R. F., FARIDHOSSEINI, F., KEZEMIAN, M., LOTFABADI, M. K., KAVIANI, H., SAMARI, A. A. (2014). Temperamentand Character Personality Dimensions inwith Bipolar I Disorder Patients. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 149–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/88650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Al-Halabí S, Herrero R, Sáiz PA ve ark. (2011) A cross-cultural comparison between Spain and the USA: temperament and character distribution by sex and age. Psychiatry Res 186:397-401.
  2. Arnau MM, Mondon S, Santacreu JJ (2008) Using the temperament and character inventory (TCI) to predict outcome after inpatient detoxification during 100 days of outpatient treatment. Alcohol Alcohol 43:583-8.
  3. Bagby RM, Ryder AG (2000) Personality and the affective disorders: past efforts, current models, and future directions. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2:465-72. Basiaux P, le Bon O, Dramaix M ve ark. (2001) Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) personality profile and sub-typing in alcoholic patients: a controlled study. Alcohol Alcohol 36:584-7.
  4. Cloninger CR (2000) A practical way to diagnose personality disorder: A proposal. J Personal Disord 14:99-108.
  5. Cloninger CR (1998) The genetics and psychobiology of the seven factor model of personality. Annual Review of Psychiatry 17:63-92.
  6. Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM ve ark. (1994) The temperament and character inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM (2009) Personality disorders. Kaplan and Sadock Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, BJ Sadock, VA Sadock (Ed). Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, s. 2197-240.
  7. Cloninger CR, Zohar AH (2011) Personality and the perception of health and happiness. J Affect Disord 128:24-32.
  8. Compton WM, Conway KP, Stinson FS ve ark. (2005) Prevalence, correlates, and comorbidity of DSM-IV antisocial personality syndromes and alcohol and specific drug use disorders in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 66:677-85.
  9. Compton WM, Thomas YF, Stinson FS ve ark. (2007) Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV drug abuse and dependence in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:566-76.
  10. Ekinci O, Albayrak Y, Ekinci AE ve ark. (2011) Relationship of trait impulsivity with clinical presentation in euthymic bipolar disorder patients. Psychiatry Research 190:259–64. Endicott J, Spitzer RL (1978) A diagnostic interview: the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35:837-44.
  11. Engström C, Brändström S, Sigvardsson S ve ark. (2004) Bipolar disorder: I. Temperament and character. J Affect