Journals / Ilahiyat Studies / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Turkish Political Thought with regard to State Authority and Community Culture: Why can a Community not Seize the State?

Pages
7–26
Publication Date
2016-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, direct words may not accurately represent the implications between the lines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Actual issues that can be treated in relation to orders (ṭarīqahs) and communities (jamāʿahs) resemble a labyrinth in which one can easily become lost.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Such difficulty becomes even more apparent when one treats an issue such as the Gülen Community, which significantly falls within the scope of intelligence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, direct words may not accurately represent the implications between the lines.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:State authority · community · religious order

Abstract

Actual issues that can be treated in relation to orders (ṭarīqahs) and communities (jamāʿahs) resemble a labyrinth in which one can easily become lost. This process is similar to running on a minefield to grasp the true essence and objectively notate the principles of such issues that add some metaphysical spice to life. Indeed, true words are not always sweet and are sometimes bitter. Such difficulty becomes even more apparent when one treats an issue such as the Gülen Community, which significantly falls within the scope of intelligence. The manifestation of everything can equally be interpreted as total concealing. It is easier said than done to disclose why political power and the Gülen Community became foes. Therefore, direct words may not accurately represent the implications between the lines.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKER, F. M. (2016). Turkish Political Thought with regard to State Authority and Community Culture: Why can a Community not Seize the State?. Ilahiyat Studies, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 7–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/884303

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Aksarâyî, Kerîmuddîn Mahmûd [Āqsarāyī, Karīm al-Dīn Maḥmūd]. Müsâmeretü’l-Ahbâr [Musāmarat al-akhbār]. Translated by Mürsel Öztürk. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 2000. Anqarawī, Ismāʿīl Rusūkhī. Sharḥ al-Mathnawī. 6 vols. Istanbul: Maṭbaʿa-i ʿĀmirah,1289. al-ʿĀrifī, Şams al-Dīn Aḥmed al-Aflākī [Shams al-Dīn Aḥmad al-Aflākī al-ʿĀrifī], Manāḳib al-ʿĀrifīn [Manāqib al-ʿārifīn]. 2 vols. Edited by Tahsin Yazıcı. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1976. al-ʿĀrifī, Şams al-Dīn Aḥmed al-Aflākī [Shams al-Dīn Aḥmad al-Aflākī al-ʿĀrifī]. (as Ahmet Eflâkî) Âriflerin Menkıbeleri. 2 vols. Translated by Tahsin Yazıcı. 3rd ed. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, 1995. Aristoteles. Politika [Politics]. Translated by Furkan Akderin. Istanbul: Say, 2013. Âşık Paşa-zâde [ʿĀshiq Pāshā-zāda], Osmanoğullarının Tarihi. Edited by Kemal Yavuz and M. A. Yekta Saraç. Istanbul: K Kitaplığı, 2003. Būrsawī, Ismāʿīl Ḥaqqī. (as İsmail Hakkı Bursevî). Kitâbü’n-Netîce [Kitāb al-natījah]. 2 vols. Edited by Ali Namlı and İmdat Yavaş. Istanbul: İnsan, 1997. Būrsawī, Ismāʿīl Ḥaqqī. Sharḥ al-Mathnawī. 2 vols. Istanbul: Maṭbaʿa-i ʿĀmirah, 1287. Būrsawī, Ismāʿīl Ḥaqqī. Tuhfe-i Aliyye [Tuḥfa-i ʿaliyyah]. Edited by Şeyda Öztürk. In Üç Tuhfe: Seyr-i Sülûk. Istanbul: İnsan, 2000. Cevdet Paşa [Jawdat Pāshā]. Tezâkir-i Cevdet [Tadhākir-i Jawdat]. 4 vols. Edited by Cavid Baysun. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1986. al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn Ṭarkhān. Kitāb taḥṣīl al-saʿādah. Beirut: Dār al-Andalus, 1981. al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn Ṭarkhān. Fuṣūl al-madanī. Edited by Douglas Morton Dunlop. Camb-ridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961. al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn Ṭarkhān. Kitāb ārāʾ ahl al-madīnah al-fāḍilah. Edited by Albīr Naṣrī Nādir. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1986. Gelibolulu Muṣṭafá ʿĀlī. Manāqib-i hunarwarān. Edited by Ibn al-Amīn Maḥmūd Kamāl [İnal]. Istanbul: Türk Tarih Encümeni, 1926. Gelibolulu Muṣṭafá ʿĀlī. Mevâ’idu’n-Nefâis fî-Ḳavâ‘ıdi’l-Mecâlis [Mawāʿid al-nafāʾis fī qawāʿid al-majālis]. Edited by Mehmet Şeker. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1997. Gelibolulu Muṣṭafá ʿĀlī. Naṣīḥatu s-selāṭīn [Naṣīḥat al-salāṭīn]. In Muṣṭafā Ālī’s Counsel for Sultans of 1581: Edition,
  2. Translation, Notes. Edi-ted by Andreas Tietze. Wien: Verlag der Österreichische Akademie der Wissenchaften, 1979. al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Maʿārij al-quds fī madārij maʿrifat al-nafs. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1988. İbn Haldun [Abū Zayd Walī al-Dīn ʿ