Journals / Ilahiyat Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Losing Our Space/Madīnah: From the Madīnah of Reality to A Simulation City

Pages
47–78
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present study focuses on how space and the city — and hence reality — have been lost by breaking away from the Islamic ḥaḍārah (tamaddun) by way of the Baudrillardian simulation concept.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Architecture or building a madīnah corresponds not only to constructing what is physical but also to building people and a community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The industrialization that started during the 18th century and gained speed during the 19th century brought with it the concept of urbanization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present study focuses on how space and the city — and hence reality — have been lost by breaking away from the Islamic ḥaḍārah (tamaddun) by way of the Baudrillardian simulation concept.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Space-Humans · Madīnah-Community · Reality-Simulation

Abstract

Architecture or building a madīnah corresponds not only to constructing what is physical but also to building people and a community. Humans construct the madīnah just as the madīnahs build the people. Quarters (maḥallahs) or madīnahs present not only physical structures but also have an administrative, social, and cultural nature. People who have lost their space have also lost themselves. Indeed, civilizations have been built on madīnahs. The industrialization that started during the 18th century and gained speed during the 19th century brought with it the concept of urbanization. Europe lost its concept of the medieval city and built cities parallel to the positivist, secular, and materialistic approaches of its traditions of thinking. The high-tech process that took place during the 1970s following industrialization transformed the material universe and order into a simulative order. The present study focuses on how space and the city — and hence reality — have been lost by breaking away from the Islamic ḥaḍārah (tamaddun) by way of the Baudrillardian simulation concept.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞ, A. (2020). Losing Our Space/Madīnah: From the Madīnah of Reality to A Simulation City. Ilahiyat Studies, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 47–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/884253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Anık, Mehmet. “Aykırı Bir Düşünür Olarak J. Baudrillard ve Gösteriş̧ Amaçlı Tüketim.” Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 9, no. 47 (2016): 441-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2016.1391.
  2. Baudelaire, Charles. Modern Hayatın Ressamı. Translated by Ali Berktay. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2004.
  3. Baudrillard, Jean. The Mirror of Production. Translated by Mark Poster. St. Louis, MO: Telos Press, 1975.
  4. Baudrillard, Jean. For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Translated by Charles Levin. St. Louis, MO: Telos Press, 1981.
  5. Baudrillard, Jean. America. Translated by Chris Turner. London & New York, NY: Verso Publications, 1989.
  6. Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. Translated by Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1994.
  7. Baudrillard, Jean. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena. Translated by James Benedict. London: Verso Publications, 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/432045.
  8. Baudrillard, Jean.The Consumer Society: Myths & Structures. London: SAGE Publications, 1998. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526401502.
  9. Baudrillard, Jean. Cool Anılar I-II: 1980-1990. Translated by Yaşar Avunç. Istanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2002.
  10. Baudrillard, Jean. İmkânsız Takas. Translated by Ayşegül Sönmezay. Istanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2005.
  11. Baudrillard, Jean. Symbolic Exchange and Death. Translated by Iain Hamilton Grant. London: SAGE Publications, 2017.
  12. Baudrillard, Jean and Jean Nouvel. The Singular Objects of Architecture. Translated by Robert Bononno. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.
  13. Bergen, Lütfi. “Medeniyetin Cüzü: Mahalle.” İdeal Kent 2 (2010): 140-168.
  14. Bergen, Lütfi. Evlerimizi Kaybediyoruz: Yerlilik Meselemiz. Ankara: MGV Yayınları, 2016.
  15. Bergen, Lütfi. Kenti Durduran Şehir. Ankara: MGV Yayınları, 2016.
  16. Bergen, Lütfi.Şehir Sünnettir. Ankara: Hitabevi Yayınları, 2016.
  17. Can, Yılmaz. “H.I-III./M.VII-IX. Y.Y. İslâm Şehri.” Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 6 (1992): 109-138.
  18. Cansever, Turgut. “İslam Mimarîsi Üzerine Düşünceler.” Divan: İlmî Araştırmalar 1, no. 1 (1996): 119-146.
  19. Cansever, Turgut. İslâm’da Şehir ve Mimari. 11th ed. Istanbul: Timaş Yayınları, 2016.
  20. Dağ, Ahmet. Ölümcül Şiddet: Baudrillard’ın Düşüncesi. Istanbul: Külliyat Yayınları, 2011.
  21. Dağ, Ahmet. Transhümanizm: İnsanın ve Dünyanın Dönüşümü. Istanbul: Elis Yayınları, 2018.
  22. Datta, Ayona and Abdul Shaban. Mega-Urbanization in the Global South: Fast Cities and New Urban Utopias of the Postcolonial State. London