SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Ethics Element in Purchasing Sustainable Clothing: A Research On Social Network Users

Sürdürülebilir Giysi Satın Almada Etik Unsurların Değerlendirilmesi: Sosyal Ağ Kullanıcıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Hatice DAĞCI BÜYÜK
Sevtap ÜNAL
Aysel ERCİŞ
Pages
1159–1184
Publication Date
2020-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it has been determined that the tendency materialism, interest in clothing and guilt have a regulatory effect between the attitude towards sustainable clothing and the intention to purchase sustainable clothing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the attitudes and buying intentions of individuals towards sustainable clothing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The consumers’ ethic traits and the impact of the social netwoks they follow have been examined in their attitudes towards sustainable clothing and intention to purchase.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it has been determined that the tendency materialism, interest in clothing and guilt have a regulatory effect between the attitude towards sustainable clothing and the intention to purchase sustainable clothing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sürdürülebilir Tüketim · Giyim ve Tekstil Sektöründe Sürdürülebilir Tüketim · Etik

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the attitudes and buying intentions of individuals towards sustainable clothing. The consumers’ ethic traits and the impact of the social netwoks they follow have been examined in their attitudes towards sustainable clothing and intention to purchase. At the same time the regulatory effect of materialism, clothing involvementand guilt feelings in this relationship have been to be determined. Accor-ding to the research results; among the ethical traits altruism and ethics obligation, positively affect the attitude towrds sustainable clothing. Social networks that consumers follow are impact on both attitude and purchasing intention. In addition, it has been determined that the tendency materialism, interest in clothing and guilt have a regulatory effect between the attitude towards sustainable clothing and the intention to purchase sustainable clothing.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, tüketicilerin sürdürülebilir giysiye yönelik tutum ve satın alma niyetleri araştırılmıştır. Sürdürülebilir giysiye yönelik tutum ve satın alma niyetinde, tüketicilerin etik özellikleri ve takip ettikleri sosyal ağların etkisi incelenmiştir. Aynı zamanda materyalizm, giysiye yönelik ilgilenimin ve suçluluk duygusunun bu ilişkide moderatör (düzenleyici) etkisi tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre; etik özelliklerden altruizm ve etik yükümlüklük sürdürülebilir giysiye yönelik tutumu olum-lu etkilemektedir. Tüketicilerin takip ettikleri sosyal ağlar ise hem tutum hem de satın alma niyeti üzerinde etkilidir. Ayrıca materyalizm eğiliminin, giysiye ilgilenimin ve suçluluk duygusunun sürdürülebilir giysiye yönelik tutum ile sürdürülebilir giysi satın alma niyeti arasında düzenleyici etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜK, H. D., ÜNAL, S., ERCİŞ, A. (2020). Evaluation of Ethics Element in Purchasing Sustainable Clothing: A Research On Social Network Users. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 1159–1184. https://ajindex.com/articles/88422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ajzen, Icek (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decison Proces-ses, 50(2), 179-211.
  2. Ajzen, Icek; Fishbein, Martin (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall. Albayrak, Tahir; Aksoy, Şafak; Caber, Meltem (2012), “The Effect of Environmental Concern and Scepticism on Green Purchase Behaviour”. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(1), 27-39.
  3. Arli, Denni; Leo, Cheryl; Tjiptono, Fandy (2016).“Investigating The İmpact of Guilt and Shame Proneness on Consumer Ethics: A Cross National Study”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40, 2-13.
  4. Bae, Su Yun (2012). Understanding Ethical Consumers: Assessıng The Moderatıng Effects of Price Sensitivity, Materialism, Impulse Buying Tendency. For the Degree of Master of Science. Colarado: Colarado State University. Bakar, Abou; Lee, Richard; Hashim, Noor Hazarina (2013). “Parsing Religiosity, Guilt and Materialism on Consumer Ethics”.Journal of Islamic Marketing, 4(3), 232-244.
  5. Bamberg, Sebastian (2003). “How Does Environmental Concern İnfluence Specific Environmentally Related Behaviors? A New Answer to an Old Question”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21-32.
  6. Barnett, Clive; Cloke, Paul (2010). Globalizing Responsibility: The Political Rationalities Of Ethical Consump-tion. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Barutçu. Süleyman; Toma, Melda (2013). “Sürdürülebilir Sosyal Medya Pazarlaması Ve Sosyal Medya Pazarla-ması Etkinliğinin Ölçümü”, İnternet Uygulamaları ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 4(1), 5-24.
  7. Belk, Russel W. (1985).“Materialism:Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World”, Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 265-279.
  8. Brennan, L.inda; Binney, Wayne (2010). “Fear, Guilt, and Shame Appeals in Social Marketing”. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 140–146.
  9. Cengiz, Hakan (2017). “Effect of The Need for Popularity on Purchase Decision Involvement and Impulse Buying Behavior Concerning Fashion Clothing”. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing 8(2), 113-124
  10. Cervellon, Marie-Cecile;Hjert,Helena;Ricard, Sandina (2010), “GREEN IN FASHION? An exploratory study of national differences in consumers concern for eco-fashion, https://www.compromisorse.com/upload/estudios/000/114/GreenFashion.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 10 Ocak 2018
  11. Chang, Man Kit (1998), “Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action of the Theory of Planned Behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, 17(16), 1825-1833
  12. Cho, Erin; Gupta, Shipra