SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

European Union Refugee Policy: A Normative Inquiry

Avrupa Birliği Mülteci Politikası: Normatif Bir Sorgulama

Sinan Veziroğlu0000-0002-0258-763X
Mustafa Atatorun(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1465-8391
Pages
508–535
Publication Date
2026-07-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This contradiction calls into question the cosmopolitan foundations of the EU, which emerged as a cosmopolitan structure, and the study discusses ways to overcome this tension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The European Union (EU) refugee policy, brought into prominence by migration inflows in recent years, is examined in this study within the context of the Normative Theory of International Relations (NTIR).
📊
Key Findings & Data:NTIR incorporates both Communitarian (national security) and Cosmopolitan (individual rights) approaches.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This contradiction calls into question the cosmopolitan foundations of the EU, which emerged as a cosmopolitan structure, and the study discusses ways to overcome this tension.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Avrupa Birliği · mülteci politikası · toplulukçuluk

Abstract

The European Union (EU) refugee policy, brought into prominence by migration inflows in recent years, is examined in this study within the context of the Normative Theory of International Relations (NTIR). NTIR incorporates both Communitarian (national security) and Cosmopolitan (individual rights) approaches. The research argues that EU policy experiences an internal tension by accommodating these two conflicting norms. While national interest concerns prioritize communitarian norms, the EU also attempts to preserve its cosmopolitan ideals. This contradiction calls into question the cosmopolitan foundations of the EU, which emerged as a cosmopolitan structure, and the study discusses ways to overcome this tension.

Özet

Son yıllarda yaşanan göç akınlarıyla gündeme gelen Avrupa Birliği (AB) mülteci politikası, bu çalışmada Normatif Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramı (NUİK) bağlamında incelenmektedir. NUİK, Toplulukçu (ulusal güvenlik) ve Kozmopolitan (bireysel haklar) yaklaşımları içerir. Araştırma, AB politikasının bu iki zıt normu barındırması nedeniyle içsel bir gerilim yaşadığını savunmaktadır. Ulusal çıkar kaygıları toplulukçu normlara ağırlık verirken, AB kozmopolitan ideallerini de korumaya çalışmaktadır. Bu çelişki, kozmopolitan bir yapı olarak ortaya çıkan AB’nin kozmopolitan temellerini sorgulatmakta ve çalışma, bu gerilimin aşılma imkanlarını tartışmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Veziroğlu, S., Atatorun, M. (2026). European Union Refugee Policy: A Normative Inquiry. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 508–535. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1824646

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (112)

  1. Adelman, H. (1988). Refuge or asylum: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Refugee Studies, 1(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/1.1.7
  2. Alexander, L., & Moore, M. (2007). Deontological ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/ethics-deontological/
  3. Alexandrescu, M. (2016). Introduction: Migration securitization towards refuge securitization - The state security against the global human rights? İçinde M. Alexandrescu (Ed.), The refugee crisis in the European Union: Between the fundamental human rights and the efforts towards securitization (ss. 11–22). CA Publishing.
  4. Aliu, A., & Aliu, D. (2022). The EU's hospitality and welcome culture: Conceiving the “no human being is illegal” principle in the EU fundamental freedoms and migration governance. Human Rights Review, 23(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10/gtmtfv
  5. Appiah, K. A. (2007). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers (1st ed.). Norton. Asylum Information Database. (2020). Country report: Greece. European Council on Refugees and Exiles. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/report-download_aida_gr_2019update.pdf
  6. Atatorun, M. (2023). Uluslararası ilişkilerde etik normlar: Geniş bir kuramsal haritalandırma. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(20), 105–124. https://doi.org/10/gssdxw
  7. Bank, R. (2014). Forced migration in Europe. İçinde E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, G. Loescher, K. Long, & N. Sigona (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies (1st ed., ss. 690–702). Oxford University Press.
  8. Bauloz, C., Ineli-Ciger, M., Singer, S., & Stoyanova, V. (2015). Introduction. İçinde C. Bauloz, M. Ineli-Ciger, S. Singer, & V. Stoyanova (Ed.), Seeking asylum in the European Union: Selected protection issues raised by the second phase of the common European asylum system (ss. 1-23). Brill Nijhoff.
  9. Bell, D. A. (2005). A communitarian critique of liberalism. Analyse & Kritik, 27(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2005-0201
  10. Bendel, P. (2021). Fresh start or false start? The new pact on migration and asylum. İçinde S. Carrera & A. Geddes (Ed.), The EU pact on migration and asylum in light of the United Nations Global Compact on Refugees (ss. 251–261). European University Institute.
  11. Benhabib, S., & Nathwani, N. (2021). The ethics of international refugee protection. İçinde C. Costello, M. Foster, & J. McAdam (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of international refugee law (ss. 114–133). Oxford University Press. Boswell, C. (2016). The ethics of refugee policy. Routledge.
  12. Bozkurt, K. (2018). Avrupa Birliği politikaları ve düzenlemeleri kapsamında göç hukuku. Legal.
  13. Byrne, R., Noll, G., & Vedsted-Hansen, J. (Eds.). (2002). New asylum countries? Migration control and refugee protection in an enlarged European Union. Kluwer Law International.
  14. Caney, S. (1992). Liberalism and communitarianism: A misconceived debate. Political Studies, 40(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10/dnrq6v
  15. Carr, E. H. (1946). The twenty years' crisis, 1919-1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. Macmillan.
  16. Cochran, M. (1999). Normative theory in international relations: A pragmatic approach. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Convention determining the state responsible for examining applications for asylum lodged in one of the Member States of the European Communities, 15 June 1990, Official Journal of the European Communities, C 254, 1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:41997A0819(01)
  18. Council of the European Union. (2004). Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted. Official Journal of the European Union, L 304, 12–23. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2004/83/oj
  19. De Bruycker, P. (2022). The new pact on migration and asylum: What it is not and what it could have been. İçinde D. Thym (Ed.), Reforming the common European asylum system: Opportunities, pitfalls, and downsides of the Commission proposals for a new pact on migration and asylum (ss. 33–42). Nomos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748931164-33
  20. Delanty, G. (2000). Citizenship in a global age: Society, culture, politics. Open University Press.
  21. Delanty, G. (2009). The significance of global ethics for critical social theory. İçinde S. Ó Tuama (Ed.), Critical turns in critical theory: New directions in social and political thought (ss. 81–96). Tauris Academic Studies.
  22. Deleixhe, M. (2024). The European Union's refugee policies: Cosmopolitan and/or democratic? İçinde M. Göbel & A. Niederberger (Ed.), Cosmopolitan norms and European values: Ethical perspectives on Europe's refugee policy (1st ed., ss. 200–223). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003245278
  23. Dickson, R. M. (2022). Migration law, policy and human rights: The impact of crisis in Europe. Routledge. Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals. (2008). Official Journal of the European Union, L 348, 98–107. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:348:0098:0107:en:PDF
  24. Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast). (2011). Official Journal of the European Union, L 337, 9–26. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/95/oj/eng
  25. Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast). (2013). Official Journal of the European Union, L 180, 60–95. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32013L0032
  26. Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection. (2013). Official Journal of the European Union, L 180, 96–116. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32013L0033
  27. Donaldson, T. (1992). Kant's global rationalism. İçinde T. Nardin & D. R. Mapel (Ed.), Traditions of international ethics (ss. 136–157). Cambridge University Press.
  28. Donnelly, J. (2004). Realism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
  29. Düwell, M. (2024). Refugee and migration policy on the basis of human dignity. İçinde M. Göbel & A. Niederberger (Ed.), Cosmopolitan norms and European values: Ethical perspectives on Europe's refugee policy (1st ed., ss. 139–153). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003245278
  30. Easton-Calabria, E. (2021). The Global Compact on Refugees and the EU's New Pact on Migration and Asylum: The ripples of responsibility-sharing. İçinde S. Carrera & A. Geddes (Ed.), The EU pact on migration and asylum in light of the United Nations Global Compact on Refugees (ss. 125–133). European University Institute.
  31. Etzioni, A. (2014). Communitarianism revisited. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(3), 241–260. https://doi.org/10/gthhdm
  32. European Commission. (2003). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament towards more accessible, equitable and managed asylum systems (COM/2003/0315 final). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52003DC0315
  33. European Commission. (2015a). A European agenda on migration (COM(2015) 240 final). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52015DC0240
  34. European Commission. (2015b). Managing the refugee crisis: Immediate operational, budgetary and legal measures under the European Agenda on Migration (COM(2015) 490 final). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0490
  35. European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a New Pact on Migration and Asylum (COM/2020/609 final). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0609
  36. European Council. (1986). Presidency conclusions: London, 6 December 1986. Council of the European Union. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/20630/1986_december_-_london__eng_.pdf
  37. European Council. (1999). Tampere European Council, 15 and 16 October 1999: Presidency conclusions. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:51999IP0187
  38. European Council. (2005). The Hague programme: Strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union (2005/C 53/01). Official Journal of the European Union, C 53, 1–14. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:053:FULL
  39. European Parliament. (2018, December 11). European Parliament resolution of 11 December 2018 with recommendations to the Commission on Humanitarian Visas (2018/2271(INL)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0494_EN.html
  40. European Union. (2010). Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2860/58644
  41. European Union Agency for Asylum. (2024). Quarterly overview of asylum case law: Issue no. 3, September 2024. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2847/6000980
  42. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2020). Coronavirus pandemic in the EU: Fundamental rights implications, bulletin 1. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2020/covid19-rights-impact-april-1
  43. Eurostat. (t.y.-a). Residence permits: Statistics on first permits issued during the year. 24 Haziran 2026 tarihinde https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Residence_permits_-_statistics_on_first_permits_issued_during_the_year adresinden erişildi.
  44. Eurostat. (t.y.-b). Residence permits: Statistics on stock of permits at the end of the year. 29 Haziran 2026 tarihinde https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Residence_permits_-_statistics_on_stock_of_permits_at_the_end_of_the_year adresinden erişildi.
  45. Eylemer, S., & Söylemez, N. (2020). Policy versus praxis: Has the European Union failed to respond to the refugee crisis? World Affairs, 183(4), 315–342. https://doi.org/10/gstdvg
  46. Falk, R. A. (2005). Dünya düzeni nereye?: Amerikan emperyal jeopolitikası (N. Domaniç & N. Arhan, Çev.). Metis Yayınları.
  47. Freeden, M. (1990). Human rights and welfare: A communitarian view. Ethics, 100(3), 489–502. https://doi.org/10/cmvdv6
  48. Friðriksdóttir, B. (2017). What happened to equality? The construction of the right to equal treatment of third-country nationals in European Union law on labour migration. Brill Nijhoff.
  49. Friedman, J. (1994). The politics of communitarianism. Critical Review, 8(2), 297–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819408443340
  50. Frost, M. (1996). Ethics in international relations: A constitutive theory. Cambridge University Press.
  51. Frost, M. (2003). Thinking ethically about refugees: A case for the transformation of global governance. İçinde E. Newman & J. van Selm (Ed.), Refugees and forced displacement: International security, human vulnerability, and the state (ss. 109–129). United Nations University Press.
  52. Garlick, M. (2014, June 16). Strengthening refugee protection and meeting challenges: The European Union's next steps on asylum. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/strengthening-refugee-protection-and-meeting-challenges-european-unions-next-steps-asylum
  53. Gordon, J. (2018). Philosophical foundations of international ethics. İçinde B. J. Steele & E. A. Heinze (Ed.), Routledge handbook of ethics and international relations (ss. 23–29). Routledge.
  54. Göbel, M., & Niederberger, A. (Eds.). (2024). Cosmopolitan norms and European values: Ethical perspectives on Europe's refugee policy (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003245278
  55. Göbel, M. (2024). What are “European values”? Philosophical reflections on an opaque political concept. İçinde M. Göbel & A. Niederberger (Ed.), Cosmopolitan norms and European values: Ethical perspectives on Europe's refugee policy (1st ed., ss. 88–114). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003245278
  56. Günther, K. (1990). Impartial application of moral and legal norms: A contribution to discourse ethics. İçinde D. M. Rasmussen (Ed.), Universalism vs. communitarianism: Contemporary debates in ethics (1st MIT Press ed., ss. 199–206). MIT Press.
  57. Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory (C. Cronin & P. De Greiff, Eds.). MIT Press.
  58. Haddad, E. (2008). The refugee in international society: Between sovereigns. Cambridge University Press. Häkli, J., Kudžmaitė, G., & Kallio, K. P. (2024). Devaluing personhood: The framing of migrants in the EU's New Pact on Migration and Asylum. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12676
  59. Hampshire, S. (1978). Public and private morality. İçinde S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality. Cambridge University Press.
  60. Hayden, P. (2009). Cosmopolitanism past and present. İçinde P. Hayden (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to ethics and international relations (ss. 43–62). Routledge.
  61. Heller, A. (1990). What is and what is not practical reason? İçinde D. M. Rasmussen (Ed.), Universalism vs. communitarianism: Contemporary debates in ethics (1st MIT Press ed., ss. 163–182). MIT Press.
  62. Hix, S., & Noury, A. (2007). Politics, not economic interests: Determinants of migration policies in the European Union. International Migration Review, 41(1), 182–205. https://doi.org/10/dzff98
  63. Hoesch, M. (2024). The European refugee crisis: What is it a crisis of? İçinde M. Göbel & A. Niederberger (Ed.), Cosmopolitan norms and European values: Ethical perspectives on Europe's refugee policy (1st ed., ss. 15–33). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003245278
  64. Huysmans, J. (1995). Migrants as a security problem: Dangers of “securitizing” societal issues. İçinde R. Miles & D. Thränhardt (Ed.), Migration and European integration: The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion (1st ed., ss. 53–72). Pinter.
  65. Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration, and asylum in the EU. Routledge.
  66. Jackson, R. (2005). Classical and modern thought on international relations: From anarchy to cosmopolis. Springer.
  67. Joly, D. (1996). Haven or hell? Asylum policies and refugees in Europe. Macmillan.
  68. Jones, D. (2003). The origins of the global city: Ethics and morality in contemporary cosmopolitanism. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10/cgj7s4
  69. Karatani, R. (2006). A “responsible EU”, multinational migration control and the case of ASEM. İçinde H. Mayer & H. Vogt (Ed.), A responsible Europe? Ethical foundations of EU external affairs (ss. 140–158). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625617
  70. Kaunert, C., & Leonard, S. (2012). The European Union asylum policy after the Treaty of Lisbon and the Stockholm Programme: Towards supranational governance in a common area of protection? Refugee Survey Quarterly, 31(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10/gssdxm
  71. Khatchadourian, H. (1999). Community and communitarianism. Peter Lang.
  72. Langford, L. M. (2013). The other Euro crisis: Rights violations under the common European asylum system and the unraveling of EU solidarity. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 26, 217–264. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hhrj26&div=8&collection=journals
  73. Lavenex, S. (2001). Migration and the EU's new eastern border: Between realism and liberalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10/c2pc9k
  74. Levy, C. (1999). European asylum and refugee policy after the Treaty of Amsterdam: The birth of a new regime? İçinde A. Bloch & C. Levy (Ed.), Refugees, citizenship and social policy in Europe (ss. 12–50). Macmillan.
  75. Linklater, A. (2007). Distant suffering and cosmopolitan obligations. International Politics, 44(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800156
  76. Lu, C. (2000). The one and many faces of cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2), 244–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00101
  77. Maley, W. (2016). What is a refugee? Oxford University Press.
  78. Manners, I. (2008). The normative ethics of the European Union. International Affairs, 84(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10/bfxcvr
  79. Marrus, M. R. (1985). The unwanted: European refugees in the twentieth century. Oxford University Press.
  80. Mouzourakis, M., Pollet, K., & Ott, J.-D. (2020). Housing out of reach? The reception of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe. European Council on Refugees and Exiles. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/aida_housing_out_of_reach-1.pdf
  81. Nancheva, N. (2015). The Common European Asylum System and the failure to protect: Bulgaria's Syrian refugee crisis. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 15(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10/gssdxn
  82. Nardin, T. (2008). International ethics. İçinde C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (ss. 594–611). Oxford University Press.
  83. Nardin, T., & Mapel, D. R. (Eds.). (1992). Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge University Press.
  84. Noll, G., & Vedsted-Hansen, J. (1999). Non-communitarians: Refugee and asylum policies. İçinde P. Alston, M. R. Bustelo, & J. Heenan (Ed.), The EU and human rights (ss. 359–410). Oxford University Press.
  85. Nussbaum, M. (1997). Kant and cosmopolitanism. İçinde J. Bohman & M. Lutz-Bachmann (Ed.), Perpetual peace: Essays on Kant's cosmopolitan ideal (ss. 25–58). MIT Press.
  86. Oakeshott, M. (1993). Morality and politics in modern Europe: The Harvard lectures (S. R. Letwin, Ed.). Yale University Press.
  87. O'Neill, O. (2004). Bounds of justice. Cambridge University Press.
  88. Oneal, J. R., & Russett, B. M. (1997). The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly, 41(2), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00042
  89. Pogge, T. (1992). Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethics, 103(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/293470
  90. Russett, B. (2010). Liberalism. İçinde T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Ed.), International relations theories: Discipline and diversity (ss. 95–115). Oxford University Press.
  91. Schuster, L. (2003). The use and abuse of political asylum in Britain and Germany. Frank Cass.
  92. Shapcott, R. (2001). Justice, community, and dialogue in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
  93. Shapcott, R. (2009). Dialogue and international ethics: Religion, cultural diversity and universalism. İçinde P. Hayden (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to ethics and international relations (ss. 443–459). Routledge.
  94. Slomp, G. (2009). The origins of realism revisited. İçinde P. Hayden (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to ethics and international relations (ss. 13–26). Ashgate.
  95. Smart, J. J. C., & Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge University Press.
  96. Soguk, N. (2015). Insurrectional politics: Theories and practices of contemporary insurrections. Globalizations, 12(6), 829–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2015.1100852
  97. Steiner, N. (2003). Arguing about asylum: The complexity of refugee debates in Europe. İçinde N. Steiner, M. Gibney, & G. Loescher (Ed.), Problems of protection: The UNHCR, refugees, and human rights (ss. 179–195). Routledge.
  98. Steiner, Z. (2017). Refugees: The timeless problem. İçinde J. Reinisch & M. Frank (Ed.), Refugees in Europe, 1919-1959: A forty years' crisis? (1st ed., ss. 21–31). Bloomsbury.
  99. Sutch, P. (2018). The slow normalization of normative political theory: Cosmopolitanism and communitarianism then and now. İçinde C. Brown & R. Eckersley (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of international political theory (ss. 34–47). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746928.013.2
  100. Şemşit, S. (2018). Avrupa Birliği politikaları bağlamında uluslararası göç olgusu ve türleri: Kavramsal bakış. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 25(1), 269–289. https://doi.org/10/ggp9b5
  101. Tam, H. (2019). The evolution of communitarian ideas: History, theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26558-8
  102. Thompson, J. (1992). Justice and world order: A philosophical inquiry. Routledge.
  103. Thränhardt, D. (2023). Welcome culture and bureaucratic ambiguity: Germany's complex asylum regime. İçinde C. Finotelli & I. Ponzo (Ed.), Migration control logics and strategies in Europe: A north-south comparison (ss. 267–281). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26002-5
  104. Tiedemann, P. (2021). Are there moral duties toward refugees? Considerations in legal ethics. Laws, 10(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10/gtmtdv
  105. United Nations General Assembly. (1951). Convention relating to the status of refugees. United Nations Treaty Series, 189, 137.
  106. United Nations General Assembly. (1959). World Refugee Year. United Nations Digital Library. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/206912
  107. Vincent, A. (2007). The nature of political theory. Oxford University Press.
  108. Wagenvoorde, R. (2017). How religion and secularism (don't) matter in the refugee crisis. İçinde L. Mavelli & E. K. Wilson (Ed.), The refugee crisis and religion: Secularism, security and hospitality in question (ss. 61–74). Rowman & Littlefield International.
  109. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. Basic Books.
  110. Walzer, M. (1990). The communitarian critique of liberalism. Political Theory, 18(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591790018001002
  111. Wolff, S. (2024). The New Pact on Migration: Embedded illiberalism? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 62(S1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13669
  112. Zolberg, A. R., Suhrke, A., & Aguayo, S. (1989). Escape from violence: Conflict and the refugee crisis in the developing world. Oxford University Press.