Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2023 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 55

Sectoral Non-Performing Loans Cycle in Turkey: An Empirical Analysis

Türkiye’de Sektörel Batık Krediler Döngüsü: Ampirik Bir Analiz

Pages
173–194
Publication Date
2023-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From this point of view, the rate of growth in non-performing loans of banks provides some predictions about the general course of the economy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines how much of the total loans are in follow-up and which sectors have difficulties repaying these loans, using the monthly data from the post-2000 period using the Event Study method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is a significant problem on which sectors these loans are concentrated on and the contribution of these sectors to the country's economy, and their effects on the economy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From this point of view, the rate of growth in non-performing loans of banks provides some predictions about the general course of the economy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Takibe Düşen Krediler · Batık Kredi · Bankacılık Sistemi

Abstract

This study examines how much of the total loans are in follow-up and which sectors have difficulties repaying these loans, using the monthly data from the post-2000 period using the Event Study method. Undoubtedly, banks’ loans to the sectors are the most basic investment element. It is a significant problem on which sectors these loans are concentrated on and the contribution of these sectors to the country's economy, and their effects on the economy. Another critical problem is the recycling problem in the payment of loans extended by banks. This situation, called non-performing loans in short, is of great importance in terms of being the leading indicator of crises. The research findings showed significant increases in almost all selected sectors in the pre-crisis, crisis, and post-crisis periods. From this point of view, the rate of growth in non-performing loans of banks provides some predictions about the general course of the economy.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı toplam kredilerin ne kadarının takibe düştüğü ve hangi sektörlerin bu kredileri geri ödeme konusunda sıkıntı yaşadığı, 2000 sonrası dönem aylık veriler kullanılarak Olay Çalışması yöntemi ile incelemektir. Yatırımların en temel unsuru şüphesiz bankalar tarafından sektörlere kullandırılan kredilerdir. Kullandırılan bu kredilerin hangi sektörler üzerinde yoğunlaştığı ve bu sektörlerin ülke ekonomisine katkıları, ekonomi üzerindeki etkilerinin neler olacağı önemli bir sorun teşkil etmektedir. Bir diğer önemli sorun ise bankalarca kullandırılan kredilerin ödenmesindeki geri dönüşüm sorunudur. Kısaca sorunlu krediler olarak adlandırılan bu durum krizlerin öncü göstergesi olması bakımından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Araştırma bulgularında, hemen hemen seçilen bütün sektörlerde kriz öncesi, kriz dönemi ve kriz sonrası dönemlerde belirgin artışların yaşandığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu açıdan değerlendirildiğinde, bankaların batık kredilerindeki artış oranları ekonominin genel gidişatı ile ilgili bir takım öngörüler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇA, T. (2023). Sectoral Non-Performing Loans Cycle in Turkey: An Empirical Analysis. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 55, 173–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/880157

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Accornero, M. et al. (2017), “Non-performing loans and the supply of bank credit: evidence from Italy”, Occasional Papers Banca d’Italia, No: 374. Akca, T. (2022a), “The effect of sectoral bank loans on economic growth in Turkey”, İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 72(1), 157-173.
  2. Akca, T. (2022b), “Econometric Analysis of the Macroeconomic Effects of Non-Performing Loans in Turkey”, in: S. Sarıbaş (ed.), Duvar Publishing (361 -373), ISBN: 978-625-8109-17-7.
  3. Akter, R. & J.K. Roy (2017), “The Impacts of Non-Performing Loan on Profitability: An Empirical Study on Banking Sector of Dhaka Stock Exchange”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, 9(3), 126-132.
  4. Alnabulsi, K. & E. Kozarevic (2021), “Interdependence Between Non-Performing Loans, Financial Stability and Economic Growth”, 10th International Scientific Symposium Region, Entrepreneurship, Development, June, Osijek. Ashley, J.W. (1962), “Stock Prices and Changes in Earnings and Dividends: Some Empirical Results”, Journal of Political Economy, 70(1), 82-85.
  5. Baker, C. (1956), “Effective Stock Splits”, Harvard Business Review, 34(1), 101-106.
  6. Balgova, M. et al. (2017), Reducing Non-Performing Loans: Stylized Facts and Economic Impact, Independent Researcher, London. Basten, M. & A.S. Serrano (2019), “European banks after the global financial crisis: A new landscape”, Journal of Banking Regulation, 20, 51-73.
  7. Baş, G. & M. Kara (2021), “The effect of macroeconomic factors on non-performing loans: A time series analysis for Turkey”, Journal of Economics Business and Political Researches, 6(16), 335-347.
  8. BDDK (2009), Krizden İstikrara Türkiye Tecrübesi,, 28.02.2021.
  9. Beck, R. et al. (2015), “Key Determinants of Non-Performing Loans: New Evidence from a Global Sample”, OpenEconRev, 26, 525-550.
  10. Budiarto, A. (2021), “The Impact of Non-Performing Loans Towards Financial Performance of BPR in Central Java, the Role of Empathy Credit Risk”, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020-Accounting and Management (ICoSIAMS 2020), Atlantis Press, 251-258.
  11. Campbell J.Y. et al. (1997), The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Second Edition,
  12. Princeton University Press,
  13. New Jersey. Cifter, A. et al. (2009), “Analysis of sectoral credit default cycle dependency with wavelet networks: evidence from Turkey”, Econ.Modell, 26, 1382-1388.
  14. Corrado, C.J. (2011), “Event Studies: A Methodology Review”, Accounting and Finance Review, 51, 207-234.
  15. Çollaku, B. &