Journals / Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

The Relationship between Economic Growth and Geographic Concentration in Banking Loans: An Ampirical Analysis Over Turkey ( 1988-2020)

Bankacılık Sektörü Kredilerinde Coğrafi Yoğunlaşma ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz (1988-2020)

Pages
224–240
Publication Date
2023-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to analysis results of the model passed the all diagnostic tests, there are negative relationship between growth and geographic concentration, but is not statistical meaningful.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Geographic concentration in banking loans means that loans are used in some locals or region, in other words loans concentrate on some regions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, in this study, it is considered the relationship between geographic concentration in Turkish banking sector loans and growt with the annually data between 1988-2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to analysis results of the model passed the all diagnostic tests, there are negative relationship between growth and geographic concentration, but is not statistical meaningful.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kredilerde coğrafi yoğunlaşma · büyüme · ARDL metodu

Abstract

Geographic concentration in banking loans means that loans are used in some locals or region, in other words loans concentrate on some regions. Banks’, systemically important, main operations is financial intermediary and so credit operations, these operations are affected and affect macro economy. While “concentration” reflects a portfolio preference, scale and geography is related with production. Therefore, every kind of concentration in banking sector, not only affect banks’ risk and return and also affect financial stability and macro economy and so, “the role of credit in macro economy” is worth to study. Therefore, in this study, it is considered the relationship between geographic concentration in Turkish banking sector loans and growt with the annually data between 1988-2020. It is not seen any study in literature such a kind of study. Because of many crises in Turkey economy in this period, it is added a dummy variable to the model for it. It is preferred Autoregressive Distributed Lag Bound Test (ARDL) as method, because the stationary levels of variables are different according to ADF and NG Perron unit root test results. As geographic concentration indicator, it is used Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. According to analysis results of the model passed the all diagnostic tests, there are negative relationship between growth and geographic concentration, but is not statistical meaningful.

Özet

Banka kredilerinde coğrafi yoğunlaşma, kredilerin belirli bölgelerde kullandırılmasını yani belirli bölgelerde yoğunlaşmasını ifade etmektedir. Sistemik öneme sahip ve ana faaliyeti krediler olan bankaların bu faaliyetleri hem makroekonomiden etkilenir hem de etkiler. Yoğunlaşma bir portfolyo tercihini yansıtırken ölçek ve coğrafya üretimle ilgili bir kavramdır. Dolayısıyla bankacılık sektörü kredilerindeki her türlü yoğunlaşmanın sadece bankaların risk ve karlılığını değil finansal istikrarı ve makroekonomiyi etkileme potansiyeli vardır ve bu nedenle “kredilerin makroekonomideki rolü” incelemeye değerdir. Bu yönde, çalışmada, Türkiye bankacılık sektörü kredilerindeki coğrafi yoğunlaşma ve büyüme ilişkisi 1988-2020 dönemi yıllık verileriyle incelenmiş olup iktisadi yazında böyle bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu uzun dönemde Türkiye ekonomisinde pek çok krizler yaşandığından bunun için modele bir kukla değişken eklenmiştir. ADF ve NG Perron testleri ile yapılan birim kök testi sonucuna göre değişkenlerin durağanlık seviyeleri farklı çıktığından yöntem olarak Otoregresif Dağıtılmış Gecikme(ARDL) yöntemi tercih edilmiştir. Coğrafi yoğunlaşma göstergesi olarak kullanılan Herfindahl-Hirschman endeksi kullanılmıştır. Tüm tanı testlerini geçen modelin analiz sonuçlarına göre, büyüme ile coğrafi yoğunlaşma endeksi arasındaki ilişki negatif yönlüdür, ancak bu sonuç istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARI, S. (2023). The Relationship between Economic Growth and Geographic Concentration in Banking Loans: An Ampirical Analysis Over Turkey ( 1988-2020). Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 224–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/878509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acharya, V. V., Saunders, A., and Hasan, I. (2002). “The Effects of Focus and Diversification on Bank Risk and Return: Evidence from Individual Bank Loan Portfolios”. Web: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1294605 adresinden 20.02.2021’de alınmıştır. Akel, V. and Gazel, S. (2014). Döviz Kurlari İle Bist Sanayi Endeksi Arasindaki Eşbütünleşme İlişkisi: Bir Ardl Sinir Testi Yaklaşimi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (44), 23-41. Argimón, I., ve Rodríguez-Moreno, M. (2021). Business complexity and geographic expansion in banking. Banco De España, No: 2132. Berger, A. N., ve DeYoung, R. (2001). The effects of geographic expansion on bank efficiency. Journal of financial services research, 19(2), 163-184.
  2. Bernanke, B.(1992). Credit in the macroeconomy”. FRBNY Quarterly Review, Spring 1992-1993,50-70.
  3. Claessens, S., ve Laeven, L. (2005). Financial dependence, banking sector competition, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(1), 179-207.
  4. Demsetz, R. S., and Strahan, P. E. (1997). “Diversification, Size, and Risk at Bank Holding Companies”. Journal of money, credit, and banking, 300-313.
  5. Deng, S., ve Elyasiani, E. (2008). Geographic diversification, bank holding company value, and risk. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40(6), 1217-1238.
  6. Diallo, B. (2017). Corporate governance, bank concentration and economic growth. Emerging Markets Review, 32, 28-37.
  7. Diallo, B., ve Koch, W. (2018). Bank concentration and schumpeterian growth: theory and ınternational evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(3), 489-501.
  8. Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association,74,427-431.
  9. Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1057-1072.
  10. Enright, M. J. (1991). Geographic concentration and industrial organization. Harvard University. Ergen, E., ve Yavuz, E. (2017). Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Tourist Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility: ARDL Method. International Journal of Economics and Innovation, 3(1), 35-46.
  11. Esen, E., Yıldırım, S., ve Kostakoğlu, S. F. (2012). Feldstein-Horioka hipotezinin Türkiye ekonomisi için sınanması: ARDL modeli uygulaması. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 7(1), 251-267.
  12. Ferreira, C. (2012).