SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Effect of Whitening Mouthwashes on the Surface Roughness of Different Surface Treated Hybrid Ceramic Material

Beyazlatıcı Ağız Gargaralarının Farklı Yüzey İşlemi Uygulanmış Hibrit Seramik Materyalin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne Etkisi

Merve ÖZARSLAN
Dilber BİLGİLİ CAN
Pages
112–118
Publication Date
2023-01-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Recorded values were evaluated with Kruskal Wallis Test, Two-Way Analysis of Variance and Tukey HSD Test (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Evaluate the effect of three whitening mouthwashes with different contents on the surface roughness of hybrid ceramic materials with three different surface treatments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The surfaces of the samples (7x5x1 mm) obtained from hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic-VE) were standardized with silicon carbide papers and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=24).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recorded values were evaluated with Kruskal Wallis Test, Two-Way Analysis of Variance and Tukey HSD Test (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hibrit Seramik · yüzey işlemi · yüzey pürüzlülüğü

Abstract

Aim: Evaluate the effect of three whitening mouthwashes with different contents on the surface roughness of hybrid ceramic materials with three different surface treatments. Material and Methods: The surfaces of the samples (7x5x1 mm) obtained from hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic-VE) were standardized with silicon carbide papers and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=24). Group C: no-extra process, Group L: VE technique kit, Group G: glaze was applied. The baseline surface roughness values (Ra) of the samples were measured with a profilometer. All groups were divided into 3 subgroups to be kept in mouthwashes with different contents (hydrogen peroxide (HP), hydrogen peroxide-free and activated carbon-containing) (n=8). After immersed in solutions for 24 hours, the samples' Ra were measured again. Recorded values were evaluated with Kruskal Wallis Test, Two-Way Analysis of Variance and Tukey HSD Test (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, üç farklı yüzey işlemi uygulanmış hibrit seramik materyalin yüzey pürüzlülüğüne farklı içerikteki üç beyazlatıcı gargaranın etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hibrit seramik bloklardan (Vita Enamic-VE) 7x5x1 mm boyutlarında örnekler hazırlandı. Numunelerin yüzeyleri silisyum karbür kağıtlar ile standardize edildi. Örnekler rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı (n=24). Grup C: ekstra işlem yapılmadı, Grup L: VE teknik kit ve Grup G: glaze uygulandı. Örneklerin başlangıç yüzey pürüzlülük değerleri (Ra) profilometre ile ölçülüp kaydedildi. Tüm gruplar farklı içerikteki gargaralarda (hidrojen peroksit, hidrojen peroksit içermeyen ve aktif karbon içeren) bekletilmek üzere 3 alt gruba ayrıldı (n=8). 24 saat solüsyonda bekletilmesini takiben örneklerin Ra değerleri tekrar ölçüldü. Örneklerin başlangıç yüzey pürüzlülük değerleri Kruskal Wallis Testi ile incelendi. 24 saat bekletme sonrası son ölçüm değerlerinin karşılaştırılmasında İki Yönlü Varyans Analizi kullanıldı ve çoklu karşılaştırmalar Tukey HSD Testi ile yapıldı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZARSLAN, M., CAN, D. B. (2023). Effect of Whitening Mouthwashes on the Surface Roughness of Different Surface Treated Hybrid Ceramic Material. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 112–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/877952

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44-56
  2. Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Güth J-F. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;55:1-11
  3. Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J. 2013;7:118
  4. Özarslan MM, Büyükkaplan UŞ, Barutcigil Ç, Arslan M, Türker N, Barutcigil K. Effects of different surface finishing procedures on the change in surface roughness and color of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network material. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(1):16-20
  5. Ruse N, Sadoun M. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014;93(12):1232-4
  6. Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(4):221-7
  7. Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, Sagsoz NP, Yildiz M. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(6):417-22
  8. Greenwall L. Bleaching techniques in restorative dentistry: An illustrated guide: CRC Press; 2001
  9. Brooks JK, Bashirelahi N, Hsia R-c, Reynolds MA. Charcoal-based mouthwashes: a literature review. Br Dent J. 2020;228(4):290-4
  10. SUBAŞI MG, DEMİR N, KARCI M, BOZKURT MG. Farkli geçici materyallerin farkli sivilarda kisa dönem bekletme sonrasi renk ve yüzey pürüzlülük değişiminin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;29(3):448-54
  11. Lee JH, Kim SH, Yoon HI, Yeo ISL, Han JS. Colour stability and surface properties of high‐translucency restorative materials for digital dentistry after simulated oral rinsing. Eur J Oral Sci. 2020;128(2):170-80
  12. Hamza TA, Alameldin AA, Elkouedi AY, Wee AG. Effect of artificial accelerated aging on surface roughness and color stability of different ceramic restorations. Stomatological Disease and Science. 2017;1:8-13
  13. Volpato CÂM, Garbelotto L, Fredel MC, Bondioli F. Application of zirconia in dentistry: biological, mechanical and optical considerations. Advances in ceramics-electric and magnetic ceramics, bioceramics, ceramics and environment. 2011;25
  14. Haywood VB, Heymann H, Kusy R, Whitley J, Andreaus S. Polis