SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Istanbul Management Journal / 2022 / Sayı: 93

Variations on Crisis Leadership in Business and Public Administration: A Bibliometric Analysis

Konuralp SEZGİLİ
Pages
39–66
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research offers readers with a road map and implications for future research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Crises are disruptive events that represent a threat to the existence of organizations, making the study of leadership a core component of crisis management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To address this gap, bibliometric methods were applied to assess the academic performance and trends, to disclose the variations in intellectual patterns, and to identify the conceptual roots of both domains.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research offers readers with a road map and implications for future research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Crisis · Crisis leadership · Crisis management

Abstract

Crises are disruptive events that represent a threat to the existence of organizations, making the study of leadership a core component of crisis management. Crisis leadership focuses on preparing organizations for and surviving crises, as well as leading thereafter. This comprehensive framework has led to several disciplines addressing crisis leadership. While there is a substantial body of literature on crisis leadership, there is a lack of bibliometric research that compares and contrasts the conceptual characteristics and intellectual patterns of the two most essential management disciplines, business and public administration. To address this gap, bibliometric methods were applied to assess the academic performance and trends, to disclose the variations in intellectual patterns, and to identify the conceptual roots of both domains. In addition to the descriptive study of performance metrics, the analytical results reveal that conceptual foundations vary considerably and are intellectually reflected by variations. The research offers readers with a road map and implications for future research.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZGİLİ, K. (2022). Variations on Crisis Leadership in Business and Public Administration: A Bibliometric Analysis. Istanbul Management Journal, Sayı: 93, 39–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/877463

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Acedo, F. J., & Casillas, J. C. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review, 14(5), 619-639. google scholar Andersen, J. A. 2010. ‘‘Public Versus Private Managers: How Public and Private Managers Differ in Leadership Behavior.’’ Public Administration Review 70(1): 131-141. google scholar Alam, M. A. (2020). Leading in the shadows: understanding administrative leadership in the context of COVID-19 pandemic management in Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Leadership, 17(1), 95-107. google scholar Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Keller, A. (2010). Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 18(4), 195-207. google scholar Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571. google scholar Ansell, C., S0rensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949-960. google scholar Aria M and Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: An R tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Infometrics 11: 959-975. google scholar Austin, L. L., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2014). Examining signs of recovery: How senior crisis communicators define organizational crisis recovery. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 844-846 google scholar Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leader- ship. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315-338. google scholar Awamleh, R., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. The leadership quarterly, 10(3), 345-373. google scholar Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. google scholar Bartsch, S., Weber, E., Büttgen, M., & Huber, A. (2020). Leadership matters in crisis-induced digital transformation: how to lead service employees effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Service Management, 32(1), 71-85. google scholar Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and p