Journals / Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

ÇALIŞANIN İŞ DEVIR HIZI: YÖNETİM İÇİN İYİ VEYA KÖTÜ BİR TUTUM MUDUR?

Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study attempts to clarify conceptual and operational inconsistencies in the literatüre around “Ghiselli's hobo syndrome.” This paper propose that defining characteristics of hobo syndrome should include both the exhibition of frequent job movement behavior and positive attitudes about such behavior

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study attempts to clarify conceptual and operational inconsistencies in the literatüre around “Ghiselli's hobo syndrome.” This paper propose that defining characteristics of hobo syndrome should include both the exhibition of frequent job movement behavior and positive attitudes about such behavior
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study attempts to clarify conceptual and operational inconsistencies in the literatüre around “Ghiselli's hobo syndrome.” This paper propose that defining characteristics of hobo syndrome should include both the exhibition of frequent job movement behavior and positive attitudes about such behavior
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study attempts to clarify conceptual and operational inconsistencies in the literatüre around “Ghiselli's hobo syndrome.” This paper propose that defining characteristics of hobo syndrome should include both the exhibition of frequent job movement behavior and positive attitudes about such behavior
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aylaklık sendromu · Kişi merkezlilik · Latent Class Analizi

Abstract

This study attempts to clarify conceptual and operational inconsistencies in the literatüre around “Ghiselli's hobo syndrome.” This paper propose that defining characteristics of hobo syndrome should include both the exhibition of frequent job movement behavior and positive attitudes about such behavior

Özet

Bu çalışma, literatürde “Ghiselli’nin Aylaklık Sendromu= Ghiselli’s Hobo Syndrome” olarak bilenen kavramsal ve operasyonel tutarsızlıkları açıklamaya yöneliktir. Bu araştırmada , aylaklık sendromunun karekteristik özelliklerini tanımlanmaya çalışılacaktır. Diğer yandan, sık görülen iş değiştirme davranışı ile bu tür davranışın pozitif bir tutum olabileceği de açıklanmaya çalışılacaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

ONAY, M. (2013). ÇALIŞANIN İŞ DEVIR HIZI: YÖNETİM İÇİN İYİ VEYA KÖTÜ BİR TUTUM MUDUR?. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/8758

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Allen, D. G., Weeks, K. P., Moffitt, K. R. (2005). “Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 980−990. Arthur, M. B., Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The boundaryless career. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Boudreau, J. W., Boswell, W. R., Judge, T. A., Bretz, R. D. (2001). “Personality and cognitive ability as predictors of job search among employed managers”, Personnel Psychology, 54: 25−50. Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T. (2006). “The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: Combinations and implications”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69: 4−18. Becton,J.C ve Judge,T.A. (2011). “Is the past prologu efor some more than others? The Hobo Syndrome and Job Complexity”, Journal of Vocational Behavior,79:448-460.
  3. Boswell, W. R., Boudreau, J. W., & Tichy, J. (2005). The relationship between employee job change and job satisfaction: The honeymoon-hangover effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 882−892. DeFillippi, R. J., Arthur, M. B. (1994). “The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15: 307−324. Dickter, D. N., Roznowski, M., Harrison, D. A. (1996). “Temporal tempering: An event history analysis of the process of voluntary turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology,81:705-716.
  4. Dougherty, T. W., Dreher, G. F., Whitely, B. (1993). “The MBA as careerist: An analysis of early career job change”, Journal of Management, 19: 535−548. Feldman, D. C., Ng, T. W. H. (2007). “Careers: Mobility, embeddedness, and success”, Journal of Management, 33: 350−377. Forrier, A., Sels, L., Stynen, D. (2009). “Career mobility at the intersection between agent and structure: A conceptual model”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82:, 739−759. Ghiselli, E. E. (1974). “Some perspectives for industrial psychology”, American Psychologist, 80: 80−87. Gould,A.(1979). “Age,Job Complexity, Satisfaction and Performance”, Journal of Vocational Behavior,14:209-223.
  5. Hall, D. T. (2004). “The protean career: A quarter-century journey”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 1− Judge, T. A., Watanabe, S. (1995). “Is the past prologue? A test of Ghiselli's hobo syndrome”, Journal of Management, 21, 211−229. Judge,T.A., Wantenabe,S. ( ).” A test of Ghiselli’s Hobo Sydrome”http://digitalcommons.ilr.Cornell.edu/cahrswp. Kateberg,R.Jr.,Hom,P.W.,Hulin,C.L.(1979).”Effects of Job Complexity on The Re