SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Ensuring IoT Privacy using Padding Strategies against Machine Learning Approaches

Ahmet Emre ERGÜN
Özgü CAN
Pages
193–197
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this purpose, the current studies are examined by considering the attacker and the defender models

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The widespread usage of Internet of Things (IoT) devices is increasing by the recent advances in embedded systems, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and wireless communications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An observer can monitor traffic to infer sensitive data by using machine learning techniques to analyze the generated encrypted traffic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this purpose, the current studies are examined by considering the attacker and the defender models
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Deep Learning · Internet of Things · Machine Learning

Abstract

The widespread usage of Internet of Things (IoT) devices is increasing by the recent advances in embedded systems, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and wireless communications. Besides, a huge amount of data is transmitted between IoT devices over insecure networks. The transferred data can be sensitive and confidential. On the other hand, these transmitted data may not appear to be sensitive or confidential data. However, machine learning techniques are used on these non-confidential data (such as packet length) to obtain data such as the type of the IoT device. An observer can monitor traffic to infer sensitive data by using machine learning techniques to analyze the generated encrypted traffic. For this purpose, padding can be added to the packets to ensure traffic privacy. This paper presents privacy problems that are caused by the traffic generated during the communication of IoT devices. Also, security and privacy measures that should be taken against the related privacy problems are explained. For this purpose, the current studies are examined by considering the attacker and the defender models

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, A. E., CAN, Ö. (2022). Ensuring IoT Privacy using Padding Strategies against Machine Learning Approaches. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 193–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/875772

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Chegini, H., Naha, R. K., Mahanti, A., & Thulasiraman, P. (2021). Process automation in an IoT–fog–cloud ecosystem: A survey and taxonomy. IoT, 2(1), 92-118.
  2. Benson, K. E., Wang, G., Venkatasubramanian, N., & Kim, Y. J. (2018, April). Ride: A resilient IoT data exchange middleware leveraging SDN and edge cloud resources. In 2018 IEEE/ACM Third International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI) (pp. 72-83).
  3. IEEE. Sinha, B. B., & Dhanalakshmi, R. (2022). Recent advancements and challenges of Internet of Things in smart agriculture: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 126, 169-184
  4. Saravanan, G., Parkhe, S. S., Thakar, C. M., Kulkarni, V. V., Mishra, H. G., & Gulothungan, G. (2022). Implementation of IoT in production and manufacturing: An Industry 4.0 approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 51, 2427-2430.
  5. Perez-Camacho, B. N., Rodriguez Gomez, G., Gonzalez-Calleros, J. M., & Martinez-López, F. J. (2022). Methodology for Designing an Electricity Demand System in the Context of IoT Household. Applied Sciences, 12(7), 3387. Alam, T., & Benaida, M. (2018). CICS: cloud–internet communication security framework for the internet of smart devices. Tanweer Alam. Mohamed Benaida." CICS: Cloud–Internet Communication Security Framework for the Internet of Smart Devices.", International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 12(6). Hassan, W. H. (2019). Current research on Internet of Things (IoT) security: A survey. Computer networks, 148, 283-294.
  6. Pinheiro, A. J., Bezerra, J. D. M., Burgardt, C. A., & Campelo, D. R. (2019). Identifying IoT devices and events based on packet length from encrypted traffic. Computer Communications, 144, 8-17.
  7. Acar, A., Fereidooni, H., Abera, T., Sikder, A. K., Miettinen, M., Aksu, H.,. & Uluagac, S. (2020, July). Peek-a-boo: I see your smart home activities, even encrypted!. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (pp. 207-218).
  8. Copos, B., Levitt, K., Bishop, M., & Rowe, J. (2016, May). Is anybody home? inferring activity from smart home network traffic. In 2016 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) (pp. 245-251).
  9. IEEE. Zantalis, F., Koulouras, G., Karabetsos, S., & Kandris, D. (2019). A review of machine learning and IoT in smart transportation. Future Internet, 11(4), 94. Gupta, B. B., Chaudhary, P., Chang, X., & Nedjah, N. (2022). Smart defense against distributed Denial of service attack in IoT networks using supervised