SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2022 / Sayı: 41

River Flow Forecasting Using the Gated Recurrent Unit Model with Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization: The Case Study of Ceyhan Basin

Hibrit Parçacık Sürüsü Optimizasyonu ile Geçitli Tekrarlayan Birim Modeli Kullanılarak Nehir Akım Tahmini: Ceyhan Havzası Örneği

Yunus ÖZTÜRK
Hüseyin Çağan KILINÇ
Ahmet POLAT
Pages
202–210
Publication Date
2022-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the hybrid model confirmed this success according to the RMSE, MAE, MAPE, SD and R2 values, which are among the evaluation criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the most important methods of efficient use of water resources is the effective implementation of watershed-based management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, daily flow data of the Fırnız River and Aksu River, flow measurement stations, which are located on different branches of the Ceyhan Basin, were used with the timespan of 2001-2010.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the hybrid model confirmed this success according to the RMSE, MAE, MAPE, SD and R2 values, which are among the evaluation criteria.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2001-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:parçacık sürüsü algoritması · nehir akımı · kapılı tekrarlayan birim

Abstract

One of the most important methods of efficient use of water resources is the effective implementation of watershed-based management. The sustainability of water resources reveals the importance of stream flow estimations. In this study, a hybrid model was proposed to river flow estimation. Deep learning methods named, gated recurrent unit (GRU) and particle swarm algorithm (PSO), are hybridized. In the study, daily flow data of the Fırnız River and Aksu River, flow measurement stations, which are located on different branches of the Ceyhan Basin, were used with the timespan of 2001-2010. Benchmark model (GRU) was compared with hybrid model (PSO-GRU) and linear regression (LR) which is one of the classical methods. Once the results were compared, it was observed that the hybrid model was more successful than the comparison and linear regression models. In addition, the hybrid model confirmed this success according to the RMSE, MAE, MAPE, SD and R2 values, which are among the evaluation criteria.

Özet

Su kaynaklarının verimli bir şekilde kullanılmasının en önemli yöntemlerinden biri havza bazlı yönetimin etkin bir şekilde gerçekleştirilmesidir. Su kaynaklarının sürdürülebilir olması, nehir akım tahminlerinin önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmada, nehir akım tahminine yardımcı olabilecek hibrit model kullanılmıştır. Derin öğrenme modellerinden olan kapılı tekrarlayan birim ve (GRU) ve parçacık sürüsü algoritması (PSO) hibritlenmiştir. Çalışmada Ceyhan Havzasının farklı kolları üzerinde yer alan Fırnız Deresi ve Aksu Çayı akım gözlem istasyonlara ait 2001-2010 yıllarına ait günlük akış verileri kullanılmıştır. İstasyon verileri kıyaslama modeli (GRU) hibrit model (PSO-GRU) ve klasik yöntemlerden olan lineer regresyon (LR) ile kıyaslanmıştır. Sonuçlar karşılaştırıldığında hibrit modelin kıyaslama ve lineer regresyon modellerine göre daha başarılı sonuçlar verdiği gözlemlenmiştir. Ayrıca değerlendirme kriterlerinden olan RMSE, MAE, MAPE, SD ve R2 değerlerine göre de hibrit model bu başarıyı doğrulamıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, Y., KILINÇ, H. Ç., POLAT, A. (2022). River Flow Forecasting Using the Gated Recurrent Unit Model with Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization: The Case Study of Ceyhan Basin. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Sayı: 41, 202–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/875508

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Zhou, S.; Song, C.; Zhang, J.; Chang, W.; Hou, W.; Yang, L. A Hybrid Prediction Framework for Water Quality with Integrated W-ARIMA-GRU and LightGBM Methods. Water 2022, 14, 1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091322
  2. Akdeğirmen, Ö. (2019). SCS Curve Number ve Soil Moisture Accounting Yöntemleriyle HEC-HMS Havza Modellemesi: Alaşehir Havzası Örneği. Yüksek lisans Tezi. İzmir, Türkiye: İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji Üniversitesi.
  3. Xu, Z., Zhou, J., Mo, L., Jia, B., Yang, Y., Fang, W., Qin, Z. (2021). A Novel Runoff Forecasting Model Based on the Decomposition-IntegrationPrediction Framework. Water, 13, 3390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ w13233390 Bittelli, M., Tomei, F., Pistocchi, A., Flury, M., Boll, J., Brooks, E.S., Antolini, G. (2010). Development and testing of a physically based, three-dimensional model of surface and subsurface hydrology. Adv. Water Resour. 33, 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.10.013
  4. Kilinc, H.C.; Haznedar, B. (2022). Hybrid Model for Streamflow Forecasting in the Basin of Euphrates. Water, 14, 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010080
  5. Chen, L.; Sun, N.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Q. (2018). Flood Forecasting Based on an Improved Extreme Learning Machine Model Combined with the Backtracking Search Optimization Algorithm. Water, 10, 1362. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101362
  6. Sun, N., Zhang, S., Peng, T., Zhang, N., Zhou, J., Zhang, H. (2022). Multi-Variables-Driven Model Based on Random Forest and Gaussian Process Regression for Monthly Streamflow Forecasting. Water, 14, 1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ w14111828 Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., Chau, K. W. (2018). Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Review. Water, 10, 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111536
  7. B. Bunday, Basic Optimization Methods, London: Edward Arnold Ltd, 1984.
  8. Çelik, Y., Yıldız, İ., Karadeniz, A. T. (2019). Son Üç Yılda Geliştirilen Metasezgisel Algoritmalar Hakkında Kısa Bir İnceleme, Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 463-477. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.638431
  9. Samanataray, S., Sahoo, A. (2021). A Comparative Study on Prediction of Monthly Streamflow Using Hybrid ANFIS-PSO Approaches. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(10), 4032–4043. https://doi:10.1007/s12205-021-2223-y
  10. Chaudhury, S., Samantaray, S., Sahoo, A., Bhagat, B., Biswakalyani, C., Satapathy, D.P. (2022). Hybrid ANFIS-PSO Model For Monthly Precipitation Forecasting. In: Bhateja, V., Tang, J., Satapathy, S.C., Peer, P., Das, R. (eds) Evolution in Computational Intelligenc