Journals / Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF THE CLINICAL FRAILTY SCALE IN THE PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WITH ACUTE ABDOMINAL PATHOLOGIES: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

AKUT KARIN PATOLOJİLERİ İLE ACİL SERVİSE BAŞVURAN GERİATRİK HASTALARDA PROGNOZU ÖNGÖRMEDE KLİNİK KIRILGANLIK ÖLÇEĞİ'NİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: PROSPEKTİF ÇALIŞMA

Pages
36–42
Publication Date
2023-01-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In geriatric patients, an increased Clinical Frailty Score may not be sufficient alone in making a surgery decision.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The CFS (Clinical Frailty Score) evaluates specific domains including function, comorbidity, and cognition to generate a frailty score ranging from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of CFS in the prediction of mortality in geriatric patients with acute abdominal pathologies.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients over 65 years who presented to the emergency department with acute abdominal pathologies between October 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In geriatric patients, an increased Clinical Frailty Score may not be sufficient alone in making a surgery decision.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Geriatrik hastalar · Kırılganlık indeksi · Cerrahi

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The CFS (Clinical Frailty Score) evaluates specific domains including function, comorbidity, and cognition to generate a frailty score ranging from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of CFS in the prediction of mortality in geriatric patients with acute abdominal pathologies.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients over 65 years who presented to the emergency department with acute abdominal pathologies between October 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 were included in the study. Clinical Frailty Score was calculated and categorized into groups from 1 to 9. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0.RESULTS: The study included 151 patients, of whom 53% were female. The mean age was 75.57±8.078 years. Twenty-two (14.56%) patients died. Clinical Frailty Score was found to be statistically significantly higher in the non-survivor group (p<0.001). Eighty-three (55%) of the patients underwent surgery. There was no statistically significant relationship between Clinical Frailty Score and mortality in the operated and non-operated groups (p=0.613). We added an age of 75 and over as a criterion (Clinical Frailty Score -age) and compared its predictive ability for mortality with CFS. There was no statistically significant difference between Clinical Frailty Score and Clinical Frailty Score-age in terms of the area under the curve values in the prediction of mortality (the area under the curve Clinical Frailty Score and Clinical Frailty Score-age p=0.597, DeLong quality test).CONCLUSIONS: High Clinical Frailty Score and Clinical Frailty Score-age are generally associated with mortality, but this may occur due to non-operation, the thought that medical treatment will be sufficient, or risk information due to comorbidities. In geriatric patients, an increased Clinical Frailty Score may not be sufficient alone in making a surgery decision.

Özet

AMAÇ: Klinik kırılganlık indeksi, 1 (çok iyi) ile 9 (ölümcül hasta) arasında değişen bir kırılganlık puanı oluşturmak amacı ile işlev, komorbidite ve biliş dahil olmak üzere belirli alanları değerlendirir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, akut abdominal patolojileri olan geriatrik hastalarda mortaliteyi öngörmede klinik kırılganlık indeksinin etkinliğini araştırmaktır.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: 01.10.2020 - 31.03.2021 tarihleri arasında acil servise akut abdomen patolojisi ile başvuran 65 yaş üstü hastalar çalışmaya alındı. Klinik kırılganlık indeksi hesaplanıp kaydedildi ve 1’den 9’a kadar gruplara ayrıldı. İstatistiksel analiz SPSS 22.0 ile gerçekleştirildi.BULGULAR: Çalışmamıza 151 hasta dahil edildi ve hastaların %53’ü kadın hasta idi. Yaş ortalaması 75,57±8,078 olup; 22(14,56%) hasta ex oldu. Hastalarımızın klinik kırılganlık indeksi incelemesinde mortal olan grupta CFS istatistiksel anlamlı olarak daha yüksek düzeyde tespit edildi (p<0,001). Hastalarımızın 83 (%55)’ü opere edildi. Opere olan ve opere olmayan grupta klinik kırılganlık indeksinin mortalite ile ilişkisi bakımından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark gözlenmemiştir (p=0,613). Yaşın 75 ve üzeri olmasını kriter olarak eklediğimizde mortaliteyi predikte etmede klinik kırılganlık indeksi ile mortalite arasında istatistiksel fark olup olmadığı da araştırıldı. Eğri altında kalan alanlar (EAA) karşılaştırıldığında ise, kırılganlık indeksi ile 75 yaş üstü kriteri ile birlikte olan kırılganlık indeksinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark görülmedi. (Eğri altında kalan alan kırılganlık indeksi ve kırılganlık indeksi-yaş p=0.597, de Longe quality test).SONUÇ: Klinik kırılganlık indeksi yüksekliği ve klinik kırılganlık indeksi-yaş, mortalite ile genellikle ilişkilidir fakat opere edilmeme, medikal tedavinin yeterli olacağı düşüncesi ya da komorbiditeler nedeni ile risk bilgilendirilmesi nedenli olarak bu durum ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Geriatrik hastalarda kırılganlık indeksi yüksekliği operasyon kararında tek başına yeterli olmayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇA, H. Ş., ÖZDEMİR, S., ALGIN, A., ALTUNOK, İ., KAR, E. (2023). EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF THE CLINICAL FRAILTY SCALE IN THE PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WITH ACUTE ABDOMINAL PATHOLOGIES: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 36–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/874681

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Katlic M.R., Coleman J (Edited by). In: Rosenthal R., Zenilman M., Katlic M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Geriatric Surgery. 3rd edition, Springer, Cham: Principles of Geriatric Surgery, 2020: 3-23
  2. Jones TS, Dunn CL, Wu DS, Cleveland JC, Kile D, Robinson TN. Relationship between asking an older adult about falls and surgical outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(12):1132-8
  3. Robinson TN, Eiseman B, Wallace J, et al. Redefining geriatric preoperative assessment using frailty, disability and co-morbidity. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):449–55
  4. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Cardiovascular health study collaborative research group. Frailty in older adults: evidence fora phenotype. J GerontolA Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):146–56
  5. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):489-95
  6. Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. A scoping review of the Clinical FrailtyScale. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20:393
  7. Manku K, Bacchetti P, Leung JM. Prognostic significance of postoperative in-hospitalcomplications in elderly patients. I. Long-term survival. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:583–9
  8. Dewan SK, Zheng SB, Xia SJ. Preoperative geriatric assessment: comprehensive, multidisciplinary and proactive. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23(6):487-94
  9. Sprung J, Gajic O, Warner DO. Review article: age related alterations in respiratory function -anesthetic considerations. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:1244–57
  10. Poh AWY, Teo SP. Utility of Frailty Screening Tools in Older Surgical Patients. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020;24(2):75-82
  11. Afilalo J, Lauck S, Kim DH et al. Frailty in older Adults undergoing aortic valve replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:689–700
  12. Rodrigues MK, Marques A, Lobo DML, Umeda KII, Oliveira MF. Pre-frailty increases therisk of adverse events in older patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(4):299–306
  13. Tse G, Gong M, Nunez J, et al. Frailty and Mortality Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Reviewand Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2017;18(12):1097.e10
  14. Hamonangan R, Wijaya IP, Setiati S, Harimurti K. Impact of frailty on the first 30 days of majorcardiac events in elderly patients with coronary artery disease undergoing elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Acta MedicaIndonesiana. 2016;48(2):91-98
  15. Okabe H, Ohsaki T, Ogawa K, et al. Frailty predi