SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

The effects of constructive and destructive leadership style on organizational climate and employee performance

Yapıcı ve yıkıcı liderlik özelliklerinin örgüt iklimi ve çalışan performansına etkisi

Hamide SELÇUK
Ali EKBER AKGÜN
Pages
61–91
Publication Date
2022-12-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that while destructive leadership affects employee performance and organizational climate negatively, constructive leadership affects them positively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the effects of constructive and destructive leadership styles on organizational climate and employee performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By examining separately whether the organizational climate has a mediating role between constructive leadership and employee performance and destructive leadership and employee performance, this study contributes to the literature on leadership and organizational climate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that while destructive leadership affects employee performance and organizational climate negatively, constructive leadership affects them positively.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yapıcı Liderlik · Yıkıcı Liderlik · Örgüt İklimi

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of constructive and destructive leadership styles on organizational climate and employee performance. By examining separately whether the organizational climate has a mediating role between constructive leadership and employee performance and destructive leadership and employee performance, this study contributes to the literature on leadership and organizational climate. The sample of the study contains 721 employees working in enterprises located in Konya and Istanbul. The study uses the relational screening model and tests hypotheses through the structural equation methodology. The results indicate that while destructive leadership affects employee performance and organizational climate negatively, constructive leadership affects them positively. The organizational climate has a fully mediating role in the relationship between destructive leadership and employee performance. Moreover, the organizational climate has a fully mediating role in the relationship between constructive leadership and employee performance.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı yapıcı ve yıkıcı liderlik tarzlarının örgüt iklimi ve çalışan performansına etkilerini araştırmak, yapıcı ve yıkıcı liderliğin çalışan performansına etkisinde örgüt ikliminin aracılık rolünün olup olmadığını ortaya koyarak liderlik ve örgüt iklimi alan yazınına katkı sağlamaktır. Çalışmanın örneklemini Konya ve İstanbul’da bulunan işletmelerde çalışan toplam 721 iş gören oluşturmaktadır. İlişkisel tarama modelinin kullanıldığı bu araştırmada hipotezler yapısal eşitlik modeli ile test edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda; yıkıcı liderliğin çalışan performansını ve örgüt iklimini negatif etkilediği, yapıcı liderliğin çalışan performansı ve örgüt iklimini pozitif etkilediği ve örgüt ikliminin yıkıcı liderliğin çalışan performansına etkisinde ve yapıcı liderliğin çalışan performansına etkisinde tam aracılık rolü olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELÇUK, H., AKGÜN, A. E. (2022). The effects of constructive and destructive leadership style on organizational climate and employee performance. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 61–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/874242

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aboyassin, N. A., & Abood, N. (2013). The effect of ineffective leadership on individual and organizational performance in Jordanian institutions. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 23(1), 68-84.
  2. Aquino, K. (2000). Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26, 171-193.
  3. Army, U. S. (2012). Army leadership. Department of the Army. Army doctrine publication (ADP) 6, 22. Aktaran, Erickson, A., Shaw, B., Murray, J., & Branch, S. (2015). Destructive leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 4(44), 266-272.
  4. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191. Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chen, Z. X. G., & Debrah, Y. A. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 393-411.
  5. Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human relations, 47(7), 755-778.
  6. Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 14(2), 126-140.
  7. Aubrey, D. W. (2012). The Effect of Toxic Leadership. Army War Coll Carlisle Barracks PA. Press:
  8. USA. Ay, F. A., & Keleş, K. (2017). Etkileşimci ve dönüşümcü liderlik tarzlarının işten ayrılma niyeti ve iş performansı üzerinde etkisi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(4), 193-203.
  9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(1), 8-34.
  10. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Barutçugil, İ. (2015). Performans yönetimi. Kariyer Developer. Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The leadership quarterly, 10(2), 181-217.
  11. Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Simon and Schuster. Başar, U., Sığrı, Ü., & Basım, N. (2016). İş yerinde