Journals / Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Düzeltme: The Deconstruction of the Contagion Movie: The Meta-Virus or Commercialization of Virus

Düzeltme: Contagion Filminin Yapısökümü: Meta-Virüs ya da Virüsün Ticarileştirilmesi

Pages
167–175
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the findings were evaluated as a whole, it seemed possible to consider Contagion as a movie that commercialized and commodified the virus, did not think about its subject and object and lied to its audience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Contagion, one of the most-watched epidemic films in the Covid-19 period, was released to the market as a wake-up call to the ethical responsibilities of government institutions and international organizations in the face of a possible pandemic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fact that the aspects of the narrative that touch today's reality were frequently mentioned in the media also provided a meaningful basis for thinking about the film.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the findings were evaluated as a whole, it seemed possible to consider Contagion as a movie that commercialized and commodified the virus, did not think about its subject and object and lied to its audience.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Covid-19 · Salgın · Contagion

Abstract

Contagion, one of the most-watched epidemic films in the Covid-19 period, was released to the market as a wake-up call to the ethical responsibilities of government institutions and international organizations in the face of a possible pandemic. The fact that the aspects of the narrative that touch today's reality were frequently mentioned in the media also provided a meaningful basis for thinking about the film. This study outed from the claim that the mentioned trends are an illusion and aimed to present a critical analysis that reveals the inconsistencies in the movie. He did this with a metonymic approach that undermines ideological metaphors, in other words, with references of the deconstructive reading. When the findings were evaluated as a whole, it seemed possible to consider Contagion as a movie that commercialized and commodified the virus, did not think about its subject and object and lied to its audience.

Özet

Covid-19 döneminde en fazla izlenen salgın filmlerinden olan Contagion, devlet kurumlarının ve uluslararası kuruluşların olası bir pandemi karşısında etik sorumluluklarına uyanma çağrısı olarak gösterime girdi. Anlatının günümüz gerçekliğine temas eden yanlarının medyada sıkça dile getirilmiş olması da film üzerine düşünmek için anlamlı bir zemin sundu. Bu çalışma sözü edilen eğilimlerin bir yanılsama olduğu iddiasından yola çıktı ve filmdeki tutarsızlıkları açığa çıkaran eleştirel bir analiz sunmayı amaçladı. Bunu da ideolojik metaforların altını oyan metonimik bir yaklaşımla diğer bir deyişle yapısökümcü okumanın referanslarıyla yaptı. Elde edilen bulgular değerlendirildiğinde, Contagion’ı, virüsü ticarileştirip meta haline getirmiş, kendi konusu, nesnesi üzerine düşünmemiş ve seyircisine yalan söylemiş bir film olarak değerlendirmek mümkün göründü.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKER, H. (2022). Düzeltme: The Deconstruction of the Contagion Movie: The Meta-Virus or Commercialization of Virus. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 167–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/872111

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Brunette, P. (2015). Toward a Deconstructive Theory of Film. Studies in The Literacy Imagination, 19(1), 55-71. [Original print: 1986].
  2. Chagla, Z., Hota, S., Khan, S., & Mertz, D. (2020). Airborne Transmission of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis, No: ciaa1118. Diken, B., ve Laustsen, C. B. (2011). Filmlerle Sosyoloji. İstanbul:
  3. Metis Yayınları.
  4. Eagleton, T. (2014). Edebiyat Kuramı. Tuncay B (çev.). İstanbul:
  5. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  6. Fontana, L.M., Villamagna, A.H., Sikka, M.K., McGregor, J.C. (2021). Understanding Viral Shedding of Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): Review of Current Literature. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 42(6), 659-668.
  7. Gaga, L. (2021). Twitter/13.02.2021. Erişim: [11.12.2021]
  8. Garrett, L. (2011). “Contagion” is part reality, part fantasy, totally possible. September 14, CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2011/09/13/opinion/garrett-Contagion-virus/index.html [02. 12. 2021].
  9. Kelly, H. (2020). People Have Found a Way to Cope with Pandemic Fears: Watching ‘Contagion’. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/03/06/Contagion-streaming/ [02.01.2021].
  10. McIntosh, K. (2021). Covıd-19: Epidemiology, Virology, and Prevention. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/covid-19-epidemiology-virology-and-prevention [06.12.2021].
  11. Meyerowitz, E.A., Richterman, A., Gandhi, R.T., & Sax, P.E. (2021). Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Review of Viral, Host, and Environmental Factors. Ann Intern Med, 174(1), 69-79.
  12. Ryan, M., ve Kellner, D. (2010). Politik Kamera-Çağdaş Hollywood Sinemasının İdeolojisi ve Politikası. Elif Ö (çev.), İstanbul:
  13. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  14. Schweitzer, D. (2018). Outbreak Narratives in Contemporary American Film and Television. Thesis PHd, University of California, Los Angeles. Siegel, D. [Director], Wanger. W, [Productor]. (1956). Invasion of the Body Snatche. [Film]. ABD: Walter Wanger Productions. Siegel, M. (2008). False Alarm/The Truth about the Epidemic of Fear. Dreamscape Media: LLC. Soderbergh, S. [Director], Shamberg, M., Sher, S., & Jacobs, G, [Productors] (2011). [Film]. ABD: Contagion.Warner Bros. Pictures. To, K.K., Tsang, O.T., Leung, W.S., et al. (2020). Temporal Profiles of Viral Load in Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva Samples and Serum Antibody Responses during Infection by SARS-CoV-2: An Observational Cohort Study. Lancet Infect Dis., 20, 565-574.
  15. Walker, C. (1999). Derrida & Deconstruction. Journal of Religion & Psychical Research, 22(1), 22-25.
  16. World Health Organization (2020). Novel coronavirus situation report-2. Janu