Journals / Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

The Effects of Polymerization in Different Light Power Modes on the Radiopacity of Composite Resins

Pages
570–581
Publication Date
2022-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highest radiopacity values were produced by the bulk-fill composites in both standard and extra power modes.Conclusion: In this study, all tested composites were found to have sufficient radiopacity for restorations according to the criteria set by the ISO.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of polymerization in different light power modes on the radiopacity of six different composite resins (Filtek Z250, Xtrafil, Tetric N Ceram, SureFil SDR Flow, Nova Compo HF, Grandio Flow).Methods: Plexiglass molds (8 mm diameter, 2 mm thickness) were used for the preparation of the samples.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Totally ten samples were formed for each composite resin (standard mode; n=5 and extra power mode; n=5).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highest radiopacity values were produced by the bulk-fill composites in both standard and extra power modes.Conclusion: In this study, all tested composites were found to have sufficient radiopacity for restorations according to the criteria set by the ISO.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Radiopacity · Bulk fill composite resin · Flowable composite resin

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of polymerization in different light power modes on the radiopacity of six different composite resins (Filtek Z250, Xtrafil, Tetric N Ceram, SureFil SDR Flow, Nova Compo HF, Grandio Flow).Methods: Plexiglass molds (8 mm diameter, 2 mm thickness) were used for the preparation of the samples. Totally ten samples were formed for each composite resin (standard mode; n=5 and extra power mode; n=5). A 2-mm-thickness buccolingual section was obtained from the extracted premolar tooth for enamel and dentin samples. To evaluate the relationship between the density of the samples and tooth structure, an Al step wedge was used as a reference. The mean gray values of each composite resin, enamel, dentin, and Al step wedge were calculated with an image analysis program. Data were analyzed with an independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD test.Results: All tested composites met ISO standards. Even if the radiopacity values of tested composites changed according to the light power mode, this change was found to be statistically significant only in SureFil SDR Flow (p=0.037). The difference between the radiopacity values of tested composites in both standard power and extra power mode was statistically significant (p<0.01). The highest radiopacity values were produced by the bulk-fill composites in both standard and extra power modes.Conclusion: In this study, all tested composites were found to have sufficient radiopacity for restorations according to the criteria set by the ISO.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, Ç., ERZURUMLU, Z. Ü., ODABAŞI, D., CENDER, E. U., ERZURUMLU, K. (2022). The Effects of Polymerization in Different Light Power Modes on the Radiopacity of Composite Resins. Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 570–581. https://ajindex.com/articles/869996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: Incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1501-1505
  2. Abbas G, Fleming GJP, Harrington E, Shortall ACC, Burke FJT. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent. 2003;31(6):437-444
  3. Imperiano MT, Khoury HJ, Pontual MLA, Montes MAJR, da Silveira MMF. The comparative radiopacity of four low viscosity composites. Braz J Oral Sci. 2007;6(20):1278-1282
  4. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(8):516-521
  5. Jandt KD, Al-Jasser AM, Al-Ateeq K, Vowles RW, Allen GC. Mechanical properties and radiopacity of experimental glass-silica-metal hybrid composites. Dent Mater. 2002;18(6):429-435
  6. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(1):227-235
  7. Nascimento AS, Lima DB, Fook MVL, Albuquerque MS, Lima EA, Sabino MA, et al. Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e107
  8. El-Damanhoury H, Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014;39(4):374-382
  9. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42(8):993-1000
  10. Türkoglu O, Bulut AC. Polymerization Light-Curing Units from Past to Present. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2019;29(4):683-690
  11. Halvorson RH, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Energy-dependent polymerization of resin-based composite. Dent Mater J. 2002;18(6):463-469
  12. Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P. Effects of resin composite composition and irradiation distance on the performance of curing lights. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):4465-4477
  13. Ishikiriama SK, Valeretto TM, Franco EB, Mondelli RF. The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(6):603-606
  14. Darmani H, Al-Hiyasat AS. The effects of BIS-GMA and TEG-DMA on female mouse fertility. Dent Mater. 2006;22(4):353-358
  15. Schweikl H, Schmalz G. Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate induces large deletions in the hprt gene of V79 cells. Mutat Res. 1999;438(1):71-78
  16. Visalli G, Baluce B, La