SavedAdd your journal

Journals / JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Positive Factors Affecting Tourism and The Impact of Individualistic and Social Benefits on the Development of Tourism Activities: The Case of Turkey’s Giresun Province

Bireysel ve Toplumsal Faydanın Turizmi Etkileyen Olumlu Faktörler ve Turizm Faaliyetlerinin Gelişimi Üzerinde Etkisi: Giresun İli Örneği

Kurtuluş Yılmaz GENÇ
Gökhan KARADİREK
Pages
17–27
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that individual and social benefits affect the perceived positive effects of tourism and the development of tourism activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to reveal the effect of individual and social benefits on the positive perception of factors affecting tourism and attitude towards the development of tourism activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data of the research was obtained from the field research conducted in Giresun province borders between October 8 and November 14, 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that individual and social benefits affect the perceived positive effects of tourism and the development of tourism activities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Turizmi Etkileyen Faktörler · Bireysel ve Toplumsal Fayda · Turizm faaliyetlerinin Gelişimi

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the effect of individual and social benefits on the positive perception of factors affecting tourism and attitude towards the development of tourism activities. The data of the research was obtained from the field research conducted in Giresun province borders between October 8 and November 14, 2019. A total of 37 questions, 30 of which were five-point Likert ratings and 7 were demographic, were asked to answer the participants. The statistics program, IBM SPSS 25, was used to test the hypotheses. The results of this research show that; there is a significant and positive relationship among themselves (economic, social and cultural, environmental) at the level of (p<0,01) among them, personal and social benefit, development of tourism activities, positive factors affecting tourism. It is concluded that individual and social benefits affect the perceived positive effects of tourism and the development of tourism activities. In addition, perceived positive tourism factors affect the development of tourism activities.

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı, turizmi etkileyen faktörlerin olumlu algılanması ve turizm faaliyetlerinin gelişmesine yönelik tutum üzerinde bireysel ve toplumsal faydanın etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Araştırmanın verileri, 8 Ekim-14 Kasım 2019 tarihleri arasında, Giresun il sınırlarında gerçekleştirilen saha araştırmasından elde edilmiştir. Katılımcıların yanıtlaması için 30’u beşli likert derecelendirme ve 7’si demografik olmak üzere toplam 37 soru yöneltilmiştir. Hipotezlerin test edilmesinde istatistik programı, IBM SPSS 25 kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırmanın sonuçları göstermiştir ki; bireysel ve toplumsal fayda, turizmin faaliyetlerinin gelişmesi, turizmi etkileyen olumlu faktörlerin (ekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel, çevresel) arasında (p<0,01) düzeyinde, anlamlı ve pozitif ilişki vardır. Bireysel ve toplumsal faydanın, algılanan olumlu turizm faktörleri ve turizm faaliyetlerinin gelişmesi üzerinde etkisinin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, algılanan olumlu turizm faktörleri, turizm faaliyetlerinin gelişmesini etkilemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇ, K. Y., KARADİREK, G. (2022). Positive Factors Affecting Tourism and The Impact of Individualistic and Social Benefits on the Development of Tourism Activities: The Case of Turkey’s Giresun Province. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 17–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/869012

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akgün, A. (2016). Giresun ilinin turizm potansiyelinin belirlenmesi, yerel Halk ve sektör temsilcilerinin algısı üzerine bir araştırma. Masters Dissertation. Nevşehir: Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi.
  2. Andereck, K., Valentine, K., Knopf, R. and Vogt, C. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(4), 1056–1076.
  3. Ap, J. (1992). Resıdents' perceptıons on tourism impacts. Annals of Tounsm Research, 19, 665-690.
  4. Ap, J. and Crompton, J. (1998). Developing and testing a tourism impact scale. Journal of Travel Research, 37, 120-130.
  5. Başer, V. (2019). Yaylalardaki arazi kullanım değişiminin coğrafi bilgi sistemi ile analizi: Giresun örneği. BEÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 167-175.
  6. Brankov, J., Glavonjić, T., Pešić, A., Petrović, M. and Tretiakova, T. (2019). Residents’ perceptions of tourism impact on community in national parks in Serbia. European Countryside, 11(1), 124-142.
  7. Brida, J., Disegna, M. and Osti, L. (2014). Residents’ perceptions of tourism impacts and attitudes towards tourism policies. Tourısmos: An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, 9(1), 37-71.
  8. Brunt, P. and Courtney, P. (1999). Host perceptions of sociocultural impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(3), 493-515.
  9. Cannonier, C., & Burke, M. (2019). The economic growth impact of tourism in Small Island Developing States—evidence from the Caribbean. Tourism Economics, 25(1), 85-108.
  10. Cooke, K. (1982). Guidelines for socially appropriate tourism development in British Columbia. Journal of Travel Research, 21(1), 22–28.
  11. Gilbert, D. and Clark, M. (1997). An exploratory examination of urban tourism impact, with reference to residents attitudes in the cities of Canterbury and Guildford. Cities, 14(6), 343-352. Giresun İli 2015
  12. Yılı Çevre Durum Raporu. (2016). Giresun: T.C. Giresun Valiliği Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü. Gürbüz, S. and Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri felsefe-yöntem-analiz, Ankara: Seçkin Akademik ve Mesleki Yayınlar. Haralambopoulos, N. and Pizam, A. (1996). Perceived impacts of tourism: the case of Samos. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(3), 503-526.
  13. Henche, B., Salvaj, E., & Cuesta-Valiño, P. (2020). A Sustainable Management Model for Cultural Creative Tourism Ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(22), 1-21.
  14. Huang, Y. H. and Stewart, W. (1996). Rural tourism development: shifting basis of community solidarity. Journal of Travel Research, 36(4), 26-31.
  15. Jurowski, C., Uysal, M. and Williams, D. (1997).