SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

COMPARISON OF PROSTHESIS ADAPTATION, BODY IMAGE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTEES WITH DIFFERENT LEVEL OF FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY

FARKLI FONKSİYONEL MOBİLİTE DÜZEYİNE SAHİP TRANSTİBİAL AMPUTELERDE PROTEZE UYUM, VÜCUT İMAJI VE YAŞAM KALİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Mehmet KURTARAN
Derya ÇELİK
İpek YELDAN
Pages
62–73
Publication Date
2022-12-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the body image perception and quality of life of the K2 group were worsened and had more functional and social limitations compared to the K3 group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to compare the results of prosthesis adaptation, body image, and quality of life according to mobility levels in patients with transtibial amputation. 43 unilateral transtibial amputees aged 40-60 years were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants were divided into two groups according to their functional mobility levels: K2(n=17) and K3(n=26).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the body image perception and quality of life of the K2 group were worsened and had more functional and social limitations compared to the K3 group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ampute · protez uyumu · vücut imajı

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to compare the results of prosthesis adaptation, body image, and quality of life according to mobility levels in patients with transtibial amputation. 43 unilateral transtibial amputees aged 40-60 years were included in the study. The participants were divided into two groups according to their functional mobility levels: K2(n=17) and K3(n=26). Prosthesis adaptation was assessed with the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale (TAPES), body image with the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS), and quality of life with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). It was found that the body image perception and quality of life of the K2 group were worsened and had more functional and social limitations compared to the K3 group (p

Özet

Bu çalışmada transtibial amputasyonlu hastalarda mobilite düzeylerine göre proteze uyum, vücut imajı ve yaşam kalitesi sonuçların karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Çalışmaya 40-60 yaş aralığında unilateral transtibial 43 ampute dahil edildi. Katılımcılar fonksiyonel mobilite seviyelerine göre K2 (n=17) ve K3 (n=26) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. Proteze uyum Trinity Amputasyon ve Protez Deneyim Ölçeği (TAPES) ile, vücut imajı Ampute Vücut İmajı Skalası (AVİS) ile, yaşam kalitesi ise Nottingham Sağlık Profili (NSP) ile değerlendirildi. K2 grubunun K3 grubuna göre vücut imajı algısının ve yaşam kalitesinin daha kötü etkilendiği, daha fazla fonksiyonel ve sosyal kısıtlılık yaşadığı tespit edildi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KURTARAN, M., ÇELİK, D., YELDAN, İ. (2022). COMPARISON OF PROSTHESIS ADAPTATION, BODY IMAGE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTEES WITH DIFFERENT LEVEL OF FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY. Gazi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 62–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/868197

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Molina-Rueda F, Molero-Sánchez A, Carratalá-Tejada M, Cuesta-Gómez A, Miangolarra-Page JC, Alguacil-Diego IM. Limits of stability in patients with vascular (due to diabetes) and nonvascular unilateral transtibial amputation: a cross-sectional study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017; 40(3):227-31. Knežević A, Salamon T, Milankov M, Ninković S, Jeremić Knežević M, Tomašević Todorović S. Assessment of quality of life in patients after lower limb amputation. Med Pregl. 2015; 68(3-4):103-8.
  2. Molina CS, Faulk J. Lower extremity amputation. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL) 2021.
  3. Fortington LV, Rommers GM, Geertzen JH, Postema K, Dijkstra PU. Mobility in elderly people with a lower limb amputation: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012; 13(4):319-25.
  4. Meier RH, Melton D. Ideal functional outcomes for amputation levels. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014; 25(1):199-212.
  5. Asano M, Rushton P, Miller WC, Deathe BA. Predictors of quality of life among individuals who have a lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008; 32(2):231-43.
  6. Baars EC, Schrier E, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB. Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: a systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(39):e12296. Sansam K, Neumann V, O'Connor R, Bhakta B. Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature. J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41(8):593-603. Molero-Sánchez A, Molina-Rueda F, Alguacil-Diego IM, Cano-de la Cuerda R, Miangolarra-Page JC. Comparison of stability limits in men with traumatic transtibial amputation and a nonamputee control group. PM R. 2015; 7(2):123-9.
  7. Pedlow H, Cormier A, Provost M, Bailey S, Balboul G, Coucill A, et al. Patient perspectives on information needs for amputation secondary to vascular surgery: what, when, why, and how much? J Vasc Nurs. 2014; 32(3):88-98.
  8. Holzer LA, Sevelda F, Fraberger G, Bluder O, Kickinger W, Holzer G. Body image and self-esteem in lower-limb amputees. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e92943. Borrenpohl D, Kaluf B, Major MJ. Survey of U.S. practitioners on the validity of the medicare functional classification level system and utility of clinical outcome measures for aiding k-level assignment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97(7):1053-63.
  9. Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES). Rehabil Psychol. 2000; 45(2):130. Topuz S, Ülger Ö, Yakut Y, Gül Şener F. Reliability and const