Journals / Alınteri Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Schulmann's Critique on Political Science and Hybrid Regimes

Şulman'ın Siyaset Bilimi Eleştirisi ve Hibrit Rejimler

Pages
113–131
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Issues such as the functioning of decision-making processes in hybrid regimes, how the power has changed hands, and the tendency of autocratization and democratization have been examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The semi-autocratic and semi-democratic political regimes that started to emerge after the Cold War were called ‘hybrid regimes’.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the beginning, hybrid regimes were seen as a stage before the transition to full democracy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Issues such as the functioning of decision-making processes in hybrid regimes, how the power has changed hands, and the tendency of autocratization and democratization have been examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hibrit rejimler · Karar alma · Rusya

Abstract

The semi-autocratic and semi-democratic political regimes that started to emerge after the Cold War were called ‘hybrid regimes’. In the beginning, hybrid regimes were seen as a stage before the transition to full democracy. Although some hybrid regimes have democratized over the years, some have not changed at all, and even some of them have become more autocratic. Therefore, theories about hybrid regimes have started to evolve. In this article, Russian political scientist Ekaterina Mikhailovna Schulmann's views on political science criticism and hybrid regimes are discussed. Schulmann is shown among the most influential political scientists and most influential women in Russia. Schulmann’s ideas and observations on hybrid regimes are valuable as they offer an insider and original view. In fact, western theorists built the main lines in the formation of the concept. However, her approach went beyond being a local adaptation of the ideas of western theorists. Expanding the theoretical framework of the concept, Shulman developed the theory and established a balanced link between theory and truth. The article includes Schulmann's critique of political science. Her ideas about hybrid regimes are discussed. Issues such as the functioning of decision-making processes in hybrid regimes, how the power has changed hands, and the tendency of autocratization and democratization have been examined.

Özet

Tüm dünyada Soğuk Savaş sonrası ortaya çıkmaya başlayan yarı otokratik yarı demokratik siyasal rejimler ‘hibrit rejimler’ olarak adlandırılmıştır. Başlangıçta hibrit rejimler tam demokrasiye geçiş öncesindeki bir aşama olarak görülmüştür. Ancak yıllar içerisinde bazı hibrit rejimler demokratikleşmesine rağmen bazıları değişim göstermemiş, bir kısmı ise daha da otokratikleşmiştir. Bu nedenle hibrit rejimlerle ilgili teoriler de gelişmeye başlamıştır. Bu makalede Rus siyaset bilimci Yekaterina Mihaylovna Şulman’ın siyaset bilimi eleştirisi ve hibrit rejimlerle ilgili görüşleri ele alınmıştır. Rusya’nın en etkili siyaset bilimcileri ve en etkili kadınları arasında gösterilen Şulman’ın hibrit rejimler ile ilgili fikir ve tespitleri içeriden ve özgün bir bakış sunduğu için değerlidir. Nitekim hibrit rejim kavramının oluşumunda ana omurgayı batılı teorisyenler inşa etmiştir. Ancak Şulman’ın yaklaşımı batılı teorisyenlerin fikirlerinin yerel bir uyarlaması olmaktan öteye gitmiştir. Kavramanın kuramsal çerçevesini genişleten Şulman, teoriyi geliştirmiş, kuram ve hakikat arasında dengeli bir bağ kurmuştur. Makalede Şulman’ın siyaset bilimine eleştirisine yer verildikten sonra, hibrit rejimler ile ilgili fikirleri ele alınmış, hibrit rejimlerde karar alma süreçlerinin işleyişi, iktidarın ne şekilde el değiştirdiği, otokratikleşme ve demokratikleşme eğilimi gibi konular irdelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMİR, E. (2022). Schulmann's Critique on Political Science and Hybrid Regimes. Alınteri Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 113–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/867054

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Yayımlanmış Eserler Acemoğlu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). Ulusların düşüşü: Güç, zenginlik ve yoksulluğun kökenleri. Doğan Egmont Yayıncılık ve Yapımcılık. Batırov, T. (2022). Politolog yekaterina şulman uyehala iz rossii. Erişim Tarihi: 05.05.2022, https://www.forbes.ru/society/462287-politolog-ekaterina-sul-man-uehala-iz-rossii
  2. Bayulgen, O. (2003). Polarizing effects of globalization: Political regimes that attract oil investments (Doktora tezi, The University of Texas at Austin). Bogaards, M. (2009). How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization, 16(2), 399-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340902777800
  3. Bonet, L., & Zamorano, M. M. (2021). Cultural policies in illiberal democracies: A conceptual framework based on the Polish and Hungarian Governing experiences. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(1), 559-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1806829
  4. Clark, G., & Gray, R. (2014). Geography is not destiny: Geography, institutions and literacy in England, 1837-1863. Oxford Economic Papers, 66(4), 1042-1069. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpu020
  5. De Walle, N. V., & Butler, K. S. (1999). Political parties and party systems in Africa's illiberal democracies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 13(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557579908400269
  6. Diamond, L. J. (1996). Is the third wave over? Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 20-37.
  7. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. John Wiley & Sons. Ekman, J. (2009). Political participation and regime stability: A framework for analyzing hybrid regimes. International Political Science Review, 30(1), 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512108097054
  8. Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo Cult Science. Engineering and Science, 37(7), 10-13.
  9. Friedman, J. (1974). Marxism, structuralism and vulgar materialism. Man, New Series, 9(3), 444-469.
  10. Furman, D. (2007). The origins and elements of imitation democracies. Eurozine, 1-20.
  11. Furman, D. (2008). Imitation democracies: the post-Soviet penumbra. New Left Review, 54, 28-47.
  12. Galimova, N., & Kostina, Y. (2018). Politolog yekaterina şulman poluçila predlojeniye voyti v SPÇ. Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2022, https://www.rbc.ru/politics/29/11/2018/5bffff0e9a7947363e3247f5
  13. Gandhi, J. (2008). Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Geddes, B. (1999). Authoritarian breakdown: Empirical test of a game theoretic argument. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Gervason