Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Investigation on Different Driving Cycle and Scenarios Considering the Autonomous Electric Vehicles

Pages
364–378
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And the obtained results are evaluated by comparing the traditional calculation results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study presents a series of analyzes considering the traction and steering demands of an autonomous electric vehicle (AEV) as a shuttle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The considered analyzes in here are dealt with as driving cycle (DC) and driving scenarios (DS) to assess the traction and steering performance of the AEV.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And the obtained results are evaluated by comparing the traditional calculation results.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Driving cycle · Driving Scenario · Autonomous Vehicle

Abstract

This study presents a series of analyzes considering the traction and steering demands of an autonomous electric vehicle (AEV) as a shuttle. The considered analyzes in here are dealt with as driving cycle (DC) and driving scenarios (DS) to assess the traction and steering performance of the AEV. The aim of this study is to evaluate the issues such as over engineering for AEV traction and steering motor requirements on a certain route by comparatively analyzing traditional and dynamic calculation under the DC and DS. Therefore, DC and DS in the lit-erature are evaluated in terms of different applications, optimization techniques, generation algorithm, parametric characterization, e-motor type etc. Afterwards, NEDC, US06, WLTC, Double Lane Change (DLC), Constant Radius (CR) and Slowly Increase Steer (SIS) are determined. Then, they are arranged according to the vehicle-specific limits on an electric golf car. The modified DCs and DSs are run on the dynamic model of the vehicle. In the performed analysis, the parame-ters such as reference trajectory tracking, yaw angle, tractive and steering forces, lateral and longitudinal displacement-acceleration, steering and traction motor power–speed-torque are investigated. And the obtained results are evaluated by comparing the traditional calculation results.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, U., KOCABIÇAK, Z. K. (2022). Investigation on Different Driving Cycle and Scenarios Considering the Autonomous Electric Vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 364–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/866187

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ehsani M., Gao Y, Emadi A. Modern Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Fuel Cell Vehicles - Fundamentals, Theory, and Design. CRC Press 2nd ed., Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. 2010
  2. Demir U., Aküner M. C. Design and Analysis of Radiaxial In-duction Motor. Electrical Engineering. 2018; 100(4): 2361-2371
  3. Christensen, T., Sørensen, N.B., Bøg, B. Energy Efficient Con-trol of an Induction Machine for an Electric Vehicle. Master Thesis, Aalborg University, Study Board of Industry and Glob-al Business Development, Denmark. 2012
  4. Demir U., Aküner M. C. Design and Optimization of in-Wheel Asynchronous Motor for Electric Vehicle. Journal of the Facul-ty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University. 2018; 18(2): 1-21
  5. Emirler M. T., Uygan İ. M. C., Güvenç B. A., Güvenç L.Robust PID Steering Control in Parameter Space for Highly Automated Driving. International Journal of Vehicular Technology. 2014; 259465: 1687-5702
  6. Ji J., Khajepour A., Melek W. W., Huang Y. Path Planning and Tracking for Vehicle Collision Avoidance Based on Model Predictive Control With Multiconstraints. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 2017; 66(2): 952-964
  7. Emirler M. T., Wang H., Güvenç B.A. Automated robust path following control based on calculation of lateral deviation and Yaw angle error. ASME 2015 dynamic systems and control conference, Columbus, OH, p.V003T50A009. New York: ASME. 2015
  8. Demir U., Aküner M. C. Using Taguchi method in defining critical rotor pole data of LSPMSM considering the power fac-tor and efficiency. Tehnički vjesnik. 2017; 24(2): 347- 353
  9. Sun X., Shi Z., Lei G., Guo Y., Zhu J. Multi-Objective Design Optimization of an IPMSM Based on Multilevel Strategy. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2020; 68(1): 139-148
  10. Guvenc B. A., Guvenc L. Robust two degree-of-freedom add-on controller design for automatic steering. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. 2002; 10(1): 137-148
  11. Kocakulak T., Solmaz, H. Ön ve son iletimli paralel hibrit araçların bulanık mantık yöntemi ile kontrolü ve diğer güç sistemleri ile karşılaştırılması. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendis-lik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 35(4): 2269-2286
  12. Snider J. M. Automatic Steering Methods for Autono-mous Automobile Path Tracking. Master Thesis, Robotics Insti-tute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2009
  13. Li L., Chaosheng H., Minghui L., Shuming S. Study on the combined design method of transient dr