SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 3

Failure Analysis and Redesign of Tubular Cross Members in a Bus Chassis Prototype

Mehmet Murat Topaç(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7462-1796
İsmail Duran(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0009-0008-1237-8963
Kübra Polat(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0009-0004-7001-6291
Fahrettin Akpak(Katmerciler A.Ş., AR-GE Merkezi)0009-0007-0336-8432
Mohaç Kılıçaslan(Katmerciler A.Ş., Ar-Ge Merkezi)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that, depending on the magnitude of impact forces, not only considerable stress concentrations emerge within the cross-member weld beads but also safety limits could be exceeded from the aspects of maximum permissible stress.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An analysis of the failure which was observed during field endurance tests of a special purpose personnel carrier bus chassis is reported.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis results show that, in cross-member weld beads, by using the new design, it is possible to reduce the stress concentration to 90%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that, depending on the magnitude of impact forces, not only considerable stress concentrations emerge within the cross-member weld beads but also safety limits could be exceeded from the aspects of maximum permissible stress.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chassis frame · Chassis systems engineering · Failure analysis

Abstract

An analysis of the failure which was observed during field endurance tests of a special purpose personnel carrier bus chassis is reported. Failure occurred in the connection region of a tubular type of cross-members and channel section side members. Firstly, in order to determine the cause of the failure, a simplified load model which stands for the case of driving over a bump is built. Afterwards, a comprehensive Finite Element (FE) model of the vehicle which includes the frame, the superstructure and the suspension system elements is created. Symmetrical and asymmetrical vertical wheel loads which simulate various idealised service conditions are applied to the model. The results showed that, depending on the magnitude of impact forces, not only considerable stress concentrations emerge within the cross-member weld beads but also safety limits could be exceeded from the aspects of maximum permissible stress. Moreover, it was observed that the system is more sensitive in terms of torsional loading. Secondly, structural suitability of an alternative rectangular section cross-member which is mounted to side member in a more flexible way, is evaluated by using FE analysis. In addition, effects of various design improvement solutions on stress concentration are discussed. The analysis results show that, in cross-member weld beads, by using the new design, it is possible to reduce the stress concentration to 90%. In field tests in which enhanced cross-member prototypes are used, no damages are reported in either chassis frame or superstructure under the service loads.

🔖

Cite This Article

Topaç, M. M., Duran, İ., Polat, K., Akpak, F., Kılıçaslan, M. (2026). Failure Analysis and Redesign of Tubular Cross Members in a Bus Chassis Prototype. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1977301

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Beermann HJ. The analysis of commercial vehicle structures. Tidbury GH, editor of English translation. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications; 1989.
  2. Sharman PW. Optimum stiffness-weight design of peripheral and ladder frames. Proc Inst Mech Eng Automob Div. 1967;182(1):61-70. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_AUTO_1967_182_015_02
  3. Rechena D, Infante V, Sousa L, Baptista R. Design and failure modes of a standard railway catenary cantilever support. Eng Fail Anal. 2020;107:104217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104217
  4. Bergmann W. Steifigkeit sperriger Bauteile. Grundlagen der Landtechnik. 1951;1:61-67.
  5. Takahashi K. A torsional strength analysis of truck frames using open section members. SAE Technical Paper. 1971;710595. https://doi.org/10.4271/710595
  6. Kerebih Jembere A, Paramasivam V, Tilahun S, Selvaraj SK. Stress analysis of different cross-section for passenger truck chassis with a material of ASTM A148 Gr 80-50. Mater Today Proc. 2021;46:7304-7316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.985
  7. Exler RL. Frame rigidity - how much and where. SAE Technical Paper. 1964;640017. https://doi.org/10.4271/640017
  8. National Heavy Vehicle Regulator. Vehicle Standards Bulletin 6: national code of practice heavy vehicle modifications. Version 3.1. National Heavy Vehicle Regulator; 2019.
  9. Topaç MM, Günal H, Kuralay NS. Fatigue failure prediction of a rear axle housing prototype by using finite element analysis. Eng Fail Anal. 2009;16(5):1474-1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.09.016
  10. Infante V, Fernandes L, Freitas M, Baptista R. Failure analysis of a nose landing gear fork. Eng Fail Anal. 2017;82:554-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.04.020
  11. Oehlschlaeger H. Einfluß der Knotenauslegung auf Verdrehsteife und -beanspruchungen von verwindungsweichen Nutzfahrzeugrahmen. Automobil Industrie. 1980;(2):69-77.
  12. Beermann HJ. Static analysis of commercial vehicle frames: a hybrid-finite element and analytical-method. Int J Veh Des. 1984;5(1-2):26-52. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.1984.061087
  13. Al-Hakeem AH. Structural analysis of truck chassis frames under longitudinal loads considering bimoment effects [PhD thesis]. Cranfield: Cranfield Institute of Technology, College of Aeronautics; 1991.
  14. Karaoğlu Ç, Kuralay NS. Stress analysis of a truck chassis with riveted joints. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2002;38(12):1115-1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(02)00054-9
  15. Mi C, Gu Z, Yang Q, Nie D. Frame fatigue life assessment of a mining dump truck based on finite element method and multibody dynamic analysis. Eng Fail Anal. 2012;23:18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.01.014
  16. Gu Z, Mi C, Wang Y, Jiang J. A-type frame fatigue life estimation of a mining dump truck based on modal stress recovery method. Eng Fail Anal. 2012;26:89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.07.004
  17. Rao VN, Eischen JW. Failure analysis of mixed mode crack growth in heavy duty truck frame rail. Case Stud Eng Fail Anal. 2016;5-6:67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csefa.2016.03.002
  18. Tomaszewski T. Fatigue life analysis of steel bicycle frame according to ISO 4210. Eng Fail Anal. 2021;122:105195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105195
  19. Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Vincenzi N. Structural analysis of an articulated urban bus chassis via FEM: a methodology applied to a case study. Stroj Vestn J Mech Eng. 2011;57(11):799-809. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2011.077
  20. Yang R, Zhang W, Li S, Xu M, Huang W, Qin Z. Finite element analysis and optimization of hydrogen fuel cell city bus body frame structure. Appl Sci. 2023;13(19):10964. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910964
  21. Gawande SH, Muley AA, Yerrawar RN. Optimization of torsional stiffness for heavy commercial vehicle chassis frame. Automot Innov. 2018;1(4):352-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42154-018-0044-6
  22. Gombor B. Dynamic analysis of a bus body frame: determination of the loads and stresses. Veh Syst Dyn. 2005;43(11):807-822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110500273400
  23. de Aguiar FHV, Gimenez MC, Pazian A, Spinelli DM. Frame structure optimization for bus chassis. SAE Technical Paper. 2002;2002-01-3383. https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-3383
  24. Zanichelli A, Kepka M, Kepka M Jr, Ronchei C, Scorza D, Vantadori S. Fatigue evaluation of bus welded joints under realistic loading: a dual-criterion approach. Prog Eng Sci. 2025;2(3):100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pes.2025.100095
  25. Hari Kishan A, Kondalarao P. Transient structural analysis of electric bus chassis frame. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021;1185(1):012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1185/1/012038
  26. Nandhakumar S, Seenivasan S, Mohammed Saalih A, Saifudheen M. Weight optimization and structural analysis of an electric bus chassis frame. Mater Today Proc. 2021;37:1824-1827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.404
  27. Pravilonis T, Sokolovskij E, Kilikevičius A, Matijošius J, Kilikevičienė K. The usage of alternative materials to optimize bus frame structure. Symmetry. 2020;12(6):1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12061010
  28. Wang Y. Structural optimization of bus chassis frame based on proxy model. J Vibroeng. 2026;28(1):105-123. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2025.25207
  29. US Army Test and Evaluation Command. Endurance testing of tracked and wheeled vehicles. Test Operations Procedure TOP 2-2-506. US Army Test and Evaluation Command; 1981.
  30. Prochenka P, Janiszewski J. Assessment and comparison of the mechanical properties of laser welded joints in Docol 1200M and Strenx S700MC steel alloy grades under impact loads. Probl Mechatron Armament Aviat Saf Eng. 2020;11(1):17-30. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.0282
  31. Guo W, Li L, Crowther D, Dong S, Francis JA, Thompson A. Laser welding of high strength steels (S960 and S700) with medium thickness. J Laser Appl. 2016;28(2):022425. https://doi.org/10.2351/1.4944100
  32. Węgrzyn T, Szymczak T, Szczucka-Lasota B, Łazarz B. MAG welding process with micro-jet cooling as the effective method for manufacturing joints for S700MC steel. Metals. 2021;11(2):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020276
  33. Fanella DA, Amon R, Knobloch B, Mazumder A. Welded connections. In: Steel design for engineers and architects. Boston: Springer; 1992. p. 231-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9729-2_6
  34. Budynas RG, Nisbett JK. Shigley's mechanical engineering design. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
  35. Reimpell J. Fahrwerktechnik. Bd. 2. Würzburg: Vogel-Verlag; 1973.
  36. Blundell M, Harty D. The multibody systems approach to vehicle dynamics. London: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006.
  37. Matschinsky W. Radführungen der Straßenfahrzeuge: Kinematik, Elasto-Kinematik und Konstruktion. 3rd rev. and expanded ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71197-1
  38. von Estorff HE. Technische Daten Fahrzeugfedern. Teil 3: Stabilisatoren. Stahlwerke Brüninghaus GmbH, Forschung und Entwicklung; 1969.
  39. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
  40. Pawlowski J. Vehicle body engineering. Tidbury GH, translator. London: Business Books; 1969.
  41. Brown JC, Robertson AJ, Serpento ST. Motor vehicle structures: concepts and fundamentals. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002.
  42. Heißing B, Ersoy M, Gies S, editors. Fahrwerkhandbuch: Grundlagen, Fahrdynamik, Komponenten, Systeme, Mechatronik, Perspektiven. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-8168-7
  43. Megson THG. Structural and stress analysis. 4th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
  44. Pippert H. Karosserietechnik: Personenwagen, Lastkraftwagen, Omnibusse; Leichtbau, Werkstoffe, Fertigungstechniken, Konstruktion und Berechnung. 3rd rev. ed. Würzburg: Vogel; 1998.
  45. Mundo D, Hadjit R, Donders S, Brughmans M, Mas P, Desmet W. Simplified modelling of joints and beam-like structures for BIW optimization in a concept phase of the vehicle design process. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2009;45(6-7):456-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2008.12.003